Archive for November 2, 2017

EXCLUSIVE: Apple Maps Lane Guidance Appears To Be Rolling Out In Canada

Posted in Commentary with tags on November 2, 2017 by itnerd

It appears that Canadians who have been waiting for Apple Maps to have lane guidance won’t have to wait anymore as it appears the feature is now rolling out in Canada. I captured these images of the feature in action on highway 403 west of Toronto via Apple CarPlay:

IMG_0934

IMG_0936.PNG

You see the above graphics about 1KM away from the exit or junction in question. On top of the visual cues, Siri will tell you to “take the two left lanes” or “take the right lane” about 150 meters out from an exit. This addition brings Apple Maps in line with Google Maps which has had this feature forever. Now I am continuing to test this feature as I have a couple of clients around the Greater Toronto Area to see, so if I notice anything else, I will update this post. Also, if you are in other parts of Canada and you see this feature, please leave a comment with a note as to where you are seeing this feature.

UPDATE: In testing I discovered that if you have two or more exits and you have to get off at the second exit, Apple Maps will choose the proper lane to get you off at the second exit without having to switch lanes. I also noted that the routing from place to place has changed for the better. The routes that Apple Maps generates seem to do a better job of avoiding traffic. Finally, lane guidance seems to only work on highways which is to be expected.

 

Hundreds Of Trump Web Domains Are Communicating With Russia And Are Sharing “Weird” Files

Posted in Commentary with tags on November 2, 2017 by itnerd

What is it with Donald Trump and Russians? I say that because the latest Russian connection has something in the region of 250 web domains that are owned by the Trump Organization have hidden connections that route through Russia for reasons that nobody understands. Here’s what Engadget had to say on this:

A new report from researchers at Unhack The Vote alleges that Donald Trump’s various web properties could hold a clue as to the President’s communication ties with Russia, and the evidence is quite substantial.

The report, which cites over 250 different subdomains belonging to the Trump organization, reveals that the web properties have hidden connections to servers that route through Russia — more specifically, through St. Petersburg. What’s most interesting is that these subdomains are named and cataloged in such a way as to avoid the chances that any random web user might accidentally stumble upon them.

If that’s not weird enough, it gets weirder:

On top of the strange communication with Russian servers, the researchers discovered what appears to be records of some extremely shady files. Filenames like “l0v3LYg1rLS0nlY4y0U.html1.zip” — which, if you’re not well versed in 1999 internet neckbeard leetspeak, means “lovely girls only 4 you” — or “gR33TpUsSY4Tth1SwE3k.html1.zip” (Great pussy for T this weekend), appear multiple times in the servers’ records. The full report is obviously well worth a read.

This is all very strange.

So the question is this…. Have these domains been pwned by hackers? If so, why hasn’t the Trump Organization’s IT department shut this down? Or is something else going on that Special Counsel Robert Muller might want to have a look at because it might tie into his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election? Either way, someone needs to answer some questions on this because on the surface, this clearly raises some red flags.

Review: Samsung 850 EVO Pro 2.5″ SSD

Posted in Products with tags on November 2, 2017 by itnerd

As part of fixing this problem with my wife’s MacBook Pro, which led me to fixing an even more serious problem, I replaced the Samsung 850 EVO drive that I popped into it with a Samsung 850 EVO Pro that I had lying around. Now, when you toss the word “pro” into a product name, it implies that it should be better, faster, and stronger. So, is it all of that? Let’s start with the main differences between the two drives:

  • The 850 EVO Pro has faster sequential read speeds of 550 MB/s vs 540 MB/s for the 850 EVO.
  • The 850 EVO Pro consumes slightly less power when reading or writing. In this case, 3.3W reading and 3.4W writing for the 850 EVO Pro versus 3.7W reading and  4.7W writing for the 850 EVO.
  • The 850 EVO Pro is rated to last 2 million hours versus 1.5 million hours for the 850 EVO.
  • The 850 EVO Pro has a 10 year warranty versus the 5 year warranty that the 850 EVO has.

So in short, the 850 EVO Pro will consume less power, is a bit more durable, and reads data a hair faster. To test the latter, I I gave my wife her MacBook Pro back after I dropped the 850 EVO Pro in and asked her if she could tell the difference. She couldn’t. But I did note some minor speed gains here and there when I tested it before handing her MacBook Pro back to her. But the differences aren’t substantial enough that the average user would notice at all.

So given that in the Samsung 850 EVO Pro is somewhere between an 18% – 23% price premium over the 850 EVO of a similar size, is there a reason to buy this drive? Well, if you need an SSD with a much longer warranty, lower power consumption and increased durability, then there is a reason to get the 850 EVO Pro. Those are the things that will appeal to people who beat up their hardware or want to get every bit of battery life out their laptop that they can. Or they simply want peace of mind which is a valuable thing to have. If however you are looking for a massive speed boost, look at the much cheaper 850 EVO as it is almost as fast as the 850 EVO Pro, has a still serviceable 5 year warranty, and you can pocket the cost difference for a night out with your significant other. In fact, for most people out there, I would recommend the latter path.

Review: Orico USB 3.0 Type C 2.5″ HDD Enclosure (2598C3)

Posted in Products with tags on November 2, 2017 by itnerd

After swapping my wife’s SSD for a faster one to solve an issue with macOS High Sierra, and in the process running into a serious issue that I had to deal with, After I dealt with that crisis, I needed to do something with her old SSD. So I decided to turn it into an external hard drive. To get there, I used the Orico USB 3.0 Type C 2.5″ HDD Enclosure. It promised a tool free install. And they were right on that front. Here’s all I had to do:

IMG_0929

Press the button on the right hand side of the enclosure:

IMG_0930

This allows you to swing open a door that allows you access to the innards of the enclosure:

IMG_0931

Slide the drive into the enclosure until the drive clicks into the place. It only goes in one way so you can’t screw it up. Then you close the door and you’re done. Declare victory and have a beer because this only took 3 minutes. Yes, I timed it. Here’s the result:

IMG_0932

It’s a metal enclosure that feels like it’s a quality product. I’m pretty sure that this will survive whatever you can throw at it. Now this enclosure comes out the box with a USB 3.0 to USB-C cable as the enclosure has a USB-C port. So while this is perfect for use with my MacBook Pro or my wife’s MacBook Pro which are both USB 3.0, you’ll need to acquire a USB-C to USB-C cable to use it with a newer MacBook Pro with USB-C. That’s a bit of a #fail. But at $25 CDN at my local computer store, it’s cheap enough that I can overlook it. If you need to repurpose a 2.5″ drive, this enclosure is a great way to go.

“Underallocation Detected On Main Device” On macOS High Sierra…. What Is This Error?

Posted in Tips with tags on November 2, 2017 by itnerd

The main reason I ended up replacing my the SSD in my wife’s MacBook Pro, which then led me to replace the battery as it was swelling and potentially dangerous was that after she upgraded to macOS High Sierra, she got this error message when disk utility was run on her MacBook Pro:

22063C77-AD56-474D-A2E5-F6CAB3CA2E3F.jpg

The error in question is “Underallocation Detected on Main device.” Now doing a Google search didn’t turn up any results in terms of what that error means. Though I did find a few reports of people having the same error. But if I had to take a guess, I would guess that when the High Sierra installer made the conversion from the old HFS+ filesystem to the new APFS filesystem, something went wrong and it didn’t properly allocate the space on the SSD. Now I may be wrong about that so if someone knows for sure what this error is, please reach out to me and let me know.

In the meantime, I needed to fix this. Since Disk Utility which is part of macOS High Sierra couldn’t fix this, and to my knowledge there are no other APFS compatible disk utilities out there at the moment, my plan of action was to:

  • Take a Samsung 850 EVO Pro 512GB SSD that I had lying around, place it inside this drive dock and connect it to the MacBook Pro via USB 3
  • Format the 850 EVO Pro for APFS without encryption
  • Use Carbon Copy Cloner to clone the drive inside the MacBook Pro to that drive,
  • Shut down the MacBook Pro upon completion of the cloning process and then swap the drive.
  • Fire it up to test that things worked fine hardware wise.
  • Run Disk Utility to confirm that the issues that sparked this were gone.
  • Check to see if TRIM was enabled for the drive (It was. But if it wasn’t I could use these instructions to enable it)
  • Reactivate Microsoft Office, rename the new SSD to “Macintosh HD” from “Untitled” and fix the Carbon Copy Cloner backup tasks that were still referencing the old drive.
  • Encrypt the drive

Now all of the above went to plan with the exception of the swelling battery. Had that not happened, it would have taken 2.5 hours to do everything but the encryption (which took about 14 hours to do by the way). But this is a pretty extreme way to solve this problem which I cannot imagine that the average user would do or could do. Plus, the only reason that I discovered this was that I ran Disk Utility a few days after the install to ensure that everything was fine, which in this case it wasn’t. Thus I have to wonder what would have happened if this was left unchecked. So I am wondering via this blog post if there was a different path I could have taken to address this? If anyone has any ideas, please leave a comment and let me know.