Yesterday the CRTC announced that it was getting Canadian telcos to implement STIR/SHAKEN technology to stop scam calls. You know, the calls for duct cleaning services, or the ones where scammers pose as government agencies who threaten you with all sorts of bad things if you don’t pay up. Here’s how the CRTC explains STIR/SHAKEN technology:
STIR/SHAKEN will enable service providers to certify whether a caller’s identity can be trusted by authenticating and verifying the caller ID information for Internet Protocol-based voice calls. This new framework will empower Canadians to determine which calls are authenticated, reducing the frequency and impact of caller ID spoofing.
In case you are not familiar with caller ID spoofing, which is faking the number that someone is calling from, this Wikipedia article can help with that.
Now it sounds good on the surface. You’ll be able to tell at a glance if the call is coming from a legitimate source, or is a scam call. So in theory by the time this fully rolls out in September 2020, Canadians should be safe from the scumbag scammers of the world.
Well, not so fast. There’s two reasons why this may be a short lived victory:
- It’s entirely possible that these scammers will simply change their tactics. Right now many overseas call centers utilize VoIP calling, but route all of that activity through a private branch exchange (PBX) based in the United States or Canada. That means it appears as a phone call originating in the U.S. or Canada. While STIR/SHAKEN would mean that scam calls originating from suspect PBX operators would start to get marked as spam, they could just set up shop with another PBX and be back in business. In other words, it would be like play whack a mole.
- STIR/SHAKEN is currently only supported in the U.S. and Canada. Other countries would have to sign on for STIR/SHAKEN to be really effective. And as far as I am aware, that hasn’t happened with any other country on the planet. So seeing as the majority of scam calls come from countries like India, this may not make that much of a difference. And as an aside one has to question if the government of India has the will to actually implement STIR/SHAKEN seeing as scammers in that country are basically bringing in large amounts of money into their economy. Though they are doing it in less than legal ways.
So STIR/SHAKEN is a good step in terms of cutting down on scam calls. But it’s only a step. More has to be done to keep people safe from the scumbags who are behind these calls and I hope that the CRTC and others are working on that.
CRTC To Rogers: We Want More Detail On How You’re Going To Deal With The July Outage…. A Lot More Detail
Posted in Commentary with tags CRTC, Rogers on August 18, 2022 by itnerdYou might recall that after the nationwide outage in July, Rogers was told by the CRTC to serve up an explanation as to what happened and what they’re going to make sure it doesn’t happen again. Which Rogers did do. Though some details were redacted which makes it look like Rogers has something to hide. Regardless, that document wasn’t good enough for the CRTC based on this:
This letter is in relation to the national service outage experienced by Rogers Communications Canada Inc. (Rogers) that began on 8 July 2022 and is in reply to Rogers’ response dated 22 July 2022 to the Commission’s request for information (the Response). The Response provided valued information for the Commission to understand the cause of the outage, impact of the outage and immediate steps to mitigate the impact.
Since the Response, Rogers has made public statements about measures to reduce the likelihood of similar events as well as address consumers’ concerns. To better understand the impact of the event, mitigating measures as well as these recent announcements, further information is required for the Commission to assess this situation.
Given the seriousness of this event, and while the Commission considers the complaints and calls for a public inquiry before it, Rogers is to provide, by 15 August 2022, comprehensive answers, including rationale and any supporting information, to the questions included in the attachment.
This letter and any subsequent correspondence will be placed on the public record. Should Rogers designate any information in its response as confidential pursuant to section 39 of the Telecom Act, an abridged version of the response must be provided for the public record. Note that, in accordance with its normal practices, the Commission may disclose or require the disclosure of information designated as confidential if its disclosure is in the public interest, i.e., where any specific direct harm likely to result from disclosure does not outweigh the public interest in disclosure.
First off, you’ll note that the request for Rogers to provide this information by August 15th. But Rogers has asked for more time. Specifically August 22nd.
Regardless, this is what the CRTC is looking for answers on:
Read from a cynical point of view, it sounds like the CRTC believes that Rogers is just putting stuff out there that they have no intention of doing in hopes of making the blowback from their outage go away, and the CRTC wants proof that they will actually follow through. It also sounds like the CRTC is for once doing its job. Which means that when Rogers puts out their response next week, it will not only be worth reading, but it will likely be a means to hold the troubled telco’s feet to the fire.
2 Comments »