BREAKING: Iristel “Guarantees” netTALK Customers Will Get Their Phone Numbers Back [UPDATED]
Another plot twist to the netTALK vs Iristel dispute comes in the form of this release from Iristel which I have reprinted in full below:
MARKHAM, Ont. January 19, 2016 – Iristel President and CEO Samer Bishay continues working with the regulator, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, to determine a solution with regard to the phone numbers of netTalk customers in Canada.
“We want to do what’s right for the Canadian consumer,” Mr. Bishay says, adding he hopes the numbers will be back to consumers within days, not weeks. “When netTalk was disconnected by another Canadian carrier in 2014 for non-payment – and Iristel stepped in to help netTalk customers – that disconnect lasted 10 days. We do not want it to last that long. But the CRTC must ensure, for the consumers’ sake that once the numbers are returned they do not run into this trouble again with netTalk refusing to pay for service.”
Iristel makes this guarantee: ALL CONSUMERS WILL GET THEIR PHONE NUMBERS BACK and be able to port them with a reputable Canadian service provider once a CRTC-sanctioned solution is achieved. In other words, if you sign up with a different Canadian service provider now, you’ll receive a new telephone number which you will be able to switch back to your long-held number currently held in reserve. We apologize for the inconvenience.
We know this has been difficult for everyone, but please bear in mind that Florida-based reseller netTalk has refused to pay Iristel for almost two years while using our CRTC-licenced telecommunications infrastructure for its customers. And netTalk did this despite collecting money from Canadian consumers.
Under CRTC rules, as carrier of record, Iristel cannot reach out and contact netTalk customers directly, unless they contact Iristel. This has added to the confusion because netTalk has repeatedly messaged its customers with distortions and untruths about this current situation.
“I’ve been asked many times if I was leery about netTalk two years ago when we stepped in to help with their non-payment disconnect by another carrier back then,” Mr. Bishay says. “And my answer is that I wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt and help their Canadian customers. Hindsight is 20-20 and had I known then what I know now, we would not have stepped in.”
Iristel cannot continue to allow netTalk to collect money from Canadian consumers and not pay its suppliers. And without a CRTC-sanctioned solution, netTalk could try to continue to abuse Canadian consumers and other suppliers. netTalk has run up fees of nearly $2 million to Iristel and such business practices must stop.
We are truly sorry for this inconvenience to netTalk customers and assure them that Iristel is not trying to put them in the middle. However, they have already paid netTalk for telephone service, yet netTalk has not paid the proper Canadian companies for customers to stay connected. netTalk’s behavior when it comes to paying its vendors was discussed publicly by employees in the past on forums:http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r29027673-General-NetTALK-Forum.
This meshes with what I got from my exclusive interview with Maged Bishara who is the Vice President of Operations at Iristel. I’ll be watching to make sure that this “guarantee” gets delivered.
UPDATE: Theo Markou reached out to me via Twitter to say that his Uncle has been able to transfer his netTALK phone number to another VoIP provider. But it sounded like a painful process:
https://twitter.com/mediacapitalist/status/689621635788337152
https://twitter.com/mediacapitalist/status/689622320265203712
If you’ve tried to port your netTALK phone number to another VoIP provider, please let me know how it goes.
January 19, 2016 at 5:15 pm
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/10-k-net-talkcom-inc-2015-04-15
http://www.corporatefinancialweeklydigest.com/2014/11/articles/litigation/investor-claims-nettalk-executives-took-control-of-board/
It may light up that Samer Bishay is not so innocent after all…
The Company = NetTalk
“On October 10, 2014, the Company received a termination letter from its primary vendor, Iristel (owned by, and with its CEO being, the previous President of netTALK), which provides telecommunications service and phone numbers (“DID”), with respect to two contracts between Iristel and the Company, one dealing with carriage and one dealing with DIDs. Upon being informed of the termination, the Company ported its carriage to a new carrier, and informed Iristel that, pursuant to its rights under the DID contract, it would port the DIDs promptly to a new provider. On October 17, 2014, Samer Bishay, previous President of the Company and CEO of Iristel, purporting to act on behalf of both the Company and Iristel, without conflict waivers of any sort, attempted to agree to rescind the termination of the DID contract, which neither Iristel nor the Company had the power to do. The Company attempted to shift the DIDs to new carriers, but Iristel, through Samer Bishay, the previous President of the Company, refused to allow these customers to be moved to new DID vendors”
Well I don’t believe anything from Iristel and Nettalk anymore and neither they have really involved the CRTC until I hear an official CRTC press release.
January 19, 2016 at 5:29 pm
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/10-k-net-talkcom-inc-2015-04-15
http://www.corporatefinancialweeklydigest.com/2014/11/articles/litigation/investor-claims-nettalk-executives-took-control-of-board/
January 19, 2016 at 9:46 pm
I have arranged for Rogers phone service. As of today, they have been unable to port my numbers as they said they cannot port numbers unless they are active. I called Iristel who refuse to even talk to me although they are responding to some of my emails. I will try again to see if they will release my numbers if I explain I am not using Net Talk