U.S. imposes visa restrictions on foreign cyber scammers 

Posted in Commentary with tags on July 27, 2026 by itnerd

The U.S. State Department announced a new visa restriction policy targeting foreign individuals responsible for or complicit in cybercrime and cyber-enabled crimes.

The restrictions may also apply to the immediate family members of those involved and are intended to disrupt overseas criminal networks.

The policy follows President Trump’s March executive order on combating cybercrime and fraud. According to the State Department, cyber scam operations cost Americans an estimated $10 billion in 2024.

John Carberry, Solution Sleuth, Xcape, Inc. had this comment:

   “Deploying diplomatic tools like targeted visa denials raises the personal stakes for transnational cybercrime syndicates, even if it seems odd that a dedicated policy was necessary to keep known criminals out of the country in the first place. By extending travel restrictions to immediate family members under Executive Order 14390, the State Department squeezes the mobility and secondary benefits of operators working from non-extradition jurisdictions. While federal sanctions target overseas infrastructure over time, enterprise security leaders cannot rely on immigration enforcement for threat mitigation. Executives must prioritize immediate technical controls, including strict identity verification, automated transaction monitoring, and robust inbound communication filtering to defeat cyber-enabled fraud at the edge.

   “Critical Takeaways

  • Enforce borderless technical controls: Treat visa restrictions as a secondary diplomatic lever while maintaining strict identity verification, transaction monitoring, and inbound message filtering.
  • Target criminal ecosystems: Recognize that expanding sanctions to immediate family members disrupts the lifestyle mobility that keeps transnational cyber syndicates motivated.
  • Do not rely on state policy for defense: Focus enterprise security budgets on stopping fraud at the network edge rather than expecting federal travel bans to reduce attack volume.

   “While denying visas to transnational scammers is a welcome step, it is remarkable that keeping international criminals out required a new policy in the first place.”

Jacob Krell, Senior Director: Secure AI Solutions & Cybersecurity, Suzu Labs had this to say:

   “The State Department’s new visa restrictions on cybercriminals target people who chose their operating model specifically to avoid US jurisdiction. Scam compound operators in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Laos aren’t applying for US visas. They built fortified facilities in countries with weak governance because distance from Western oversight is the product feature.

   “This is industrialized crime running on franchise economics, shared financial infrastructure, trafficking pipelines, specialized service divisions. Rubio cited $10 billion in US losses for 2024. Regional losses hit $88-114 billion in 2025, tripled from 2023. You don’t get to that number with individual bad actors. You get there with an industry.

   “DOJ’s June seizure of Huione Group assets showed what effective disruption looks like at this scale, going after shared financial architecture that multiple franchises depend on. Visa restrictions are an individual-accountability tool applied to a problem that has outgrown individual accountability. The industry keeps running regardless of which operators can board a flight to JFK.”

This is an important step forward for sure. I for one would love to see it go further. Like arrest people that are involved in cybercrime and arrest their relatives in exchange for the criminals turning themselves in. That way either people don’t get involved in cybercrime, turn in the perpetrators, or distance themselves accordingly letting the authorities know about it. And other countries should follow suit.

Hackers hijack hotel Wi-Fi to steal Microsoft 365 credentials

Posted in Commentary with tags on July 27, 2026 by itnerd

Hackers are compromising DNS settings on hotel and conference center Wi-Fi gateways to redirect guests to fake Microsoft 365 login pages and steal account credentials, according to ReliaQuest.

Once attackers gain administrative access to a gateway, they modify its DNS settings to redirect users attempting to access legitimate Microsoft 365 services to phishing pages designed to capture credentials.

The campaign has been active since at least June and has targeted organizations across the financial services, professional services, legal, healthcare, energy and retail sectors. Researchers identified compromised Wi-Fi gateways in multiple U.S. cities, as well as in India and Saudi Arabia.

Seemant Sehgal, Founder & CEO, BreachLock has this comment:

   “Gaining admin access to a hospitality gateway and rewriting its DNS configuration is not something I’d consider a sophisticated operation. The failure point here is that these gateways were reachable with credentials that could be compromised in the first place, and whatever monitoring existed on them was not watching for configuration changes. Every person who authenticated to Microsoft 365 over that network handed over credentials they will now use on a corporate device, inside a corporate environment, and the organizations they work for have no visibility into that event at all.”

Denis Calderone, CTO, Suzu Labs provided this comment:

   “This is becoming more and more common. This is basically the same playbook as what APT28 did with 18,000 home routers in the FrostArmada campaign back in April. In this case the attacker is targeting legitimate hotel Wi-Fi gateways. The initial access is likely through exposed admin interfaces and the attack is simple enough; they are just reconfiguring DNS settings so all clients connected to the AP get fraudulent DNS responses of their choosing. When a guest’s laptop asks where login.microsoftonline.com is, the gateway sends them to the attacker’s server instead. It’s simple, effective and is sweeping in its scope.

   “The attackers are using two techniques for compromising user accounts. The first is simple enough, it just involves presenting an attacker-controlled fraudulent Microsoft logon page. The other technique is even more concerning. The second technique involves device-code authentication abuse, where the user is redirected to what looks like a normal Microsoft authorization approval prompt, and if the user approves it, it actually authorizes a session the attacker initiated. Microsoft issues a valid OAuth token to the attacker’s client, and that token is already MFA-satisfied. No credentials stolen, no tokens intercepted, MFA completely bypassed. Device-code authentication was designed for input-constrained devices like smart TVs and conference room displays, but it’s enabled by default in Entra ID and many enterprises have never turned it off because they don’t know it’s there. This should be disabled via Conditional Access for all users except the handful of service accounts or device groups that genuinely need it.

   “For the DNS side, the goal is to force managed devices to control their own DNS resolution and ignore whatever the local network hands them via DHCP. The generic advice is encrypted DNS in strict mode, and that’s correct, but how you implement it matters because strict DNS pinning to a public resolver will break most hotel captive portals and can also break on-premises Active Directory domain resolution if you’re running a hybrid environment. If you’re a Cloudflare shop, the WARP agent handles this the cleanest. It has built-in captive portal detection that temporarily allows local unencrypted DNS just long enough for the user to accept the hotel terms, then locks everything down through Cloudflare’s encrypted tunnel.

   “If you’re running Cisco, the Umbrella roaming client does the same thing, binding to the network stack and tunneling DNS to Cisco’s resolvers regardless of what DHCP says. If you’re a Microsoft house, you can push encrypted DNS settings natively through Intune. The setting you want is called ‘Strive’ mode, which attempts encrypted DNS first but temporarily falls back to plaintext when it can’t connect, like when you’re stuck behind a hotel login page. The stricter ‘Require’ mode gives you better protection but will completely break internet access on any network that blocks outbound encrypted DNS until you authenticate, which is most hotels. And if you already have an always-on VPN deployed, make sure captive portal remediation is configured, because without it your users can’t authenticate to the hotel portal to get online in the first place, and the workaround is usually disabling the VPN entirely, which defeats the purpose.

   “Also disable WPAD via Group Policy. ReliaQuest saw the attackers attempt WPAD abuse in roughly a third of cases, serving a malicious proxy config that would route all Windows application traffic through the attacker’s proxy. WPAD is on by default in Windows and almost nobody needs it.”

Damon Small, Board of Directors, Xcape, Inc. followed with this comment:

   “Compromising hotel network gateways to hijack DNS traffic exposes traveling executives to silent account takeover without touching corporate email perimeters. When adversaries gain administrative control over hospitality Wi-Fi access points, they modify local DNS settings to route Microsoft 365 login attempts to credential harvesting portals. Security leaders must operate on a fundamental principle: never trust any network that you yourself do not control. Because remote employees frequently connect through untrusted public infrastructure, organizations must provide tamper-resistant access methods, such as an always-on full-tunnel Virtual Private Network (VPN), to encapsulate all DNS and application traffic. Enforcing encrypted tunnels alongside phishing-resistant multi-factor authentication ensures corporate identities remain secure even when local network environments are fully compromised.

   “Critical Takeaways

  • Assume local networks are hostile: Treat every hotel, conference center, and public network as untrusted, operating under the assumption that local DNS resolution may be compromised.
  • Mandate tamper-resistant access: Enforce always-on full-tunnel VPN policies on all corporate endpoints to route all DNS and web traffic through secure corporate resolvers.
  • Enforce phishing-resistant authentication: Deploy FIDO2 tokens or passkeys and disable vulnerable authentication flows to prevent token theft even if a user reaches a forged portal.

   “An always-on full-tunnel VPN turns an untrusted hotel network back into what it was meant to be: simple commodity bandwidth.”

John Strand, Owner, Black Hills Information Security, Inc. has this comment:

   “This attack reminds me of the Wall of Sheep that’s been a fixture at security conferences for years. The lesson has always been the same. If you don’t trust the network, then don’t trust the network. On a public WiFi connection, you have no control over the DNS settings, the proxy configuration, or what traffic is being monitored or manipulated. That’s why anyone accessing sensitive corporate resources should be connecting through a trusted corporate VPN or, in many cases, avoiding public WiFi altogether by using a cellular hotspot. Security professionals have been warning people not to trust public wireless networks for well over 15 years. This attack doesn’t introduce a new lesson. It reinforces one we’ve known all along.”

Larry Pesce, VP of Services, Finite State adds this:

   “What surprises me most isn’t the technique, it’s the timeline. Security researchers have been demonstrating and warning about exactly this class of attack for the better part of a decade. Compromise the gateway, own DNS, and you own where every guest thinks they’re going. What’s new here isn’t the method, it’s that we finally have large scale, in-the-wild evidence that real threat actors are operationalizing it. The gap between ‘we know this is possible’ and ‘we can prove it’s happening’ just closed, and that should worry anyone who travels for work.

   “For years the standard response to this kind of research was ‘sure, but who’s actually doing it?’ These findings are the answer. DNS on a network you don’t control is trust by default, and these attackers are simply cashing in on that trust.

   “The attribution here is worth understanding, but so is the caveat. ReliaQuest connects this to tradecraft overlapping with APT28, the Russian military intelligence group also known as Fancy Bear or Forest Blizzard, and specifically to a prior router-based operation they call FrostArmada. But they are careful, and rightly so. They are pointing at technique similarity, not shared infrastructure or code reuse, so this is a low to medium confidence link, not a fingerprint. That distinction matters, because it’s easy for headlines to turn ‘looks like’ into ‘is.’

   “If this is APT28 or something in that orbit, the interesting shift is who they went after. Groups like this have historically been surgical, redirecting only traffic that matched specific keywords or targets. What researchers describe here is the opposite: non-selective redirection that scooped up anyone who connected. The sector spread backs that up. Financial services, legal, healthcare, energy, professional services, retail, across US cities, India, and Saudi Arabia. That isn’t a laser pointed at one industry. That’s a net.

   “And that’s the part I want people to sit with. Even if a nation-state actor is ultimately hunting a handful of high-value people, they don’t know who’s going to sit down at that hotel lobby Wi-Fi. So they take everyone. Your credentials might not be the prize, but they are an asset. A mailbox at an unrelated company is a launch pad for business email compromise. A retail employee’s login is a foothold, a pivot, a way to look legitimate on the way to the real target. In espionage terms, access is access, and low value access still has value.

   “A takeaway isn’t ‘I’m not important enough to be a target.’ On a shared, compromised network, importance is decided after the fact. You give up the credential first, and someone else decides later how to monetize or weaponize it. That’s exactly why the hygiene matters for everyone, not just the executives and the obvious high-risk roles. The person who assumes they’re not worth targeting is often the easiest way in.

   “The core lesson is that connecting to a network is not the same as trusting it. Whoever controls the gateway controls name resolution, and if that gateway is compromised, your device will happily follow it straight to a fake Microsoft 365 login page.

   “Here’s the part people get wrong: WPA2 and WPA3 do not save you here. Wi-Fi security encrypts the link between your laptop and the access point. It says nothing about whether the gateway sitting behind that access point is honest. A hotel network can be fully WPA3 protected and still be poisoning your DNS. Link-layer encryption is not the same as a trustworthy network.

   “Assume any network you don’t own is hostile. Use a VPN or encrypted DNS, such as DNS over HTTPS or DNS over TLS pointed at a resolver you trust, so a compromised gateway can’t silently redirect you. Take TLS certificate warnings seriously instead of clicking through them. And move to phishing resistant authentication like passkeys or FIDO2 security keys, because even a perfect looking fake login page can’t replay a hardware-backed credential. If Microsoft 365 suddenly asks you to log in again on hotel Wi-Fi, that’s your cue to stop and get suspicious.”

This is a simple travel maxim. If you can’t see the router, or you can see it but you cannot control it, you can’t trust it. The easy fix is to use a VPN. It doesn’t matter which one. And it doesn’t matter if this is a corporate account or a personal one. Any WiFi that you can’t see or you can’t control is untrustworthy by default.

Canadian Wants Limits On How Long Rogers, TELUS, and Bell Can Put You On Hold… But That Won’t Solve The Issue

Posted in Commentary with tags , , on July 27, 2026 by itnerd

I hear all the time from the clients that I have that Rogers is the worst when it comes to customer service. A 2.5 hour wait time to get to customer service isn’t unusual. And disconnections are not uncommon which forces you to phone back in and try to get help. The thing is that Bell and TELUS isn’t any different when it comes to that respect. And Frank Brown has a plan to change that.

His fix is to force a 10-minute maximum hold time for every telecom operating in Canada. This would also be backed by financial penalties by the Federal Government for companies that miss it. Now if that sounds familiar, Spain has rules like that now. If you want to sign the petition, click here.

My take goes something like this. This only partially solves the problem. This only became a problem when Rogers, Telus and Bell were allowed to outsource jobs to countries like the Philippines, Morocco, and Egypt to name a few. Bringing those jobs back to Canadians who need jobs, and backing that with financial penalties would go a long way to solving this issue as well. What is needed is two things. One is Rogers, TELUS and Bell showing leadership and not only implanting a 10 minute or less hold time and bringing jobs back to Canada. Now that is wishful thinking as those three companies have failed to show any sort of meaningful leadership over the years. That brings to the Federal Government smacking them silly until they comply with both. Because if the Federal Government really wants to show leadership in this area, now would be the time to do so.

So, how about it Federal Government. Will you hold Rogers, TELUS and Bell accountable? Seriously, will you?

Epson EcoTank: The ultimate back-to-school companion every family needs 

Posted in Commentary with tags on July 27, 2026 by itnerd

The start of a new school year brings plenty of excitement. It also brings a steady stream of forms, assignments, work sheets and unexpected requests. As families prepare for the year ahead, Epson’s EcoTank printers are reliable home essentials that are as important as backpacks, pencil cases and a good pair of runners. From forgotten worksheets to study packages and last-minute projects, Epson is there when life inevitably throws you a pop quiz.

ET-2980 Wireless All-in-One Colour Supertank Printer (MSRP: $399.99 CAD)

For many parents, back-to-school season is all about finding ways to simplify busy routines. The Epson EcoTank ET-2980 is designed for the everyday printing needs that come with the school year and daily life, from science fair projects and study guides to family schedules and shipping labels.  Epson’s EcoFit bottles allow families to print worry free in colour, without the headache of changing cartridges. With enough ink included to last up to three years1, it helps reduce the last-minute stress of running out of ink, which aways seems to happen at the worst possible moment.

Where to Buy:

ET-4950 Wireless All-in-One Colour Supertank Printer(MSRP: $599.99 CAD)

As school and work increasingly overlap at home, many families need a printer that can handle more than the occasional homework assignment. The Epson EcoTank ET-4950 is designed for higher-volume printing needs, with features such as automatic double-sided printing, copying and scanning to support both students and professionals. Its wireless mobile printing capabilities2 also offer added flexibility for busy households where work and learning can happen from virtually anywhere.

Where to Buy:

GitHub and PyPI both just closed the gap attackers rely on for supply chain attack

Posted in Commentary with tags , on July 27, 2026 by itnerd

GitHub and PyPI both introduced new policies this week aimed at slowing down how fast malicious code can spread through the software supply chain. GitHub’s Dependabot will now wait at least three days before opening a pull request for a new package release, and PyPI is blocking new file uploads to any release older than 14 days, both closing the same window attackers have relied on: the gap between a malicious release going out and anyone noticing.

SecurityWeek has more:

To prevent the fast delivery of malicious code through the immediate fetching of brand-new releases, GitHub has introduced a Dependabot cooldown, where the automation tool waits for at least three days after a release has been published before opening a pull request.

“Waiting a few days before adopting a new release gives maintainers, security researchers, and automated scanners time to spot a malicious version and get it pulled before it ever reaches your pull requests,” GitHub explains.

The three-day cooldown only applies to non-security version bumps, and the behavior can be modified through the configuration option in the dependabot.yml.

“Three days as the default balances two goals: it pushes you past the window where most of these attacks live, and it doesn’t hold your dependencies back longer than necessary,” GitHub notes.

PyPI, on the other hand, is preventing the poisoning of releases older than 14 days by blocking the upload of new files to them.

“This restriction was put in place to prevent old and long-stable releases from being poisoned in case publishing tokens or workflows of PyPI projects were compromised. As far as we are aware, this has not yet been abused, but there is no technical reason beyond that attackers weren’t aware it was possible,” PyPI says.

The behavior will be enforced once ‘Upload 2.0 API’ and ‘Staged Previews’ have been standardized by PEP 694 and will affect only a small fraction of projects that still publish new files to older releases.

Maggie McDaniel, Global Head of Intelligence, iCOUNTER had this to say:

“This is exactly the kind of outcome effective public-private intelligence sharing is supposed to produce. Security researchers and the community kept surfacing the same pattern, a maintainer account gets compromised, a malicious release goes out, and automated tooling propagates it into thousands of projects before anyone has a chance to catch it, and instead of that staying a research finding, it became a platform-level policy change. A three-day cooldown on Dependabot and a 14-day lock on new uploads to existing PyPI releases won’t stop every attack, but they close the exact window that made this class of attack so effective: the gap between publication and detection. What I’d want to know now is whether other package ecosystems are watching this and building the same kind of delay into their own automation, because the ecosystems that don’t will be the ones attackers target next.”

This is a positive move. But it needs to be backed by knowing what goes into your applications without fail. Otherwise we will have a different version of the same problem.

Check Point zero-day highlights identity control shortfalls

Posted in Commentary with tags on July 27, 2026 by itnerd

With Check Point warning that attackers are actively exploiting the critical SmartConsole authentication bypass flaw (CVE-2026-16232) to obtain full administrative privileges, this is another reminder that security infrastructure itself has become a prime target. 

The vulnerability has already been exploited in the wild, prompting emergency patch guidance and inclusion in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog which can be found here..

Bojan Simic, CEO and co-founder, HYPR had this to say:

“Authentication bypass flaws like this happen when systems treat the token as the proof of identity instead of verifying what actually produced it. If an attacker can trick the application into issuing a token without a legitimate authentication event, that token becomes nothing more than a bearer credential. Whoever possesses it gets access, regardless of how it was obtained.

Passkeys fundamentally change that model. The private key never leaves the user’s device, so there is no shared secret, password hash, or reusable credential traveling across the network for an attacker to steal, replay, or manipulate into creating a valid session. By eliminating passwords and other static credentials, phishing-resistant authentication dramatically reduces the attack surface these flaws depend on.

However, authentication can’t stop at verifying the device. Organizations also need to verify the person behind it, particularly when granting privileged access or stepping up an administrative session. Device-bound cryptography establishes trust in the device; identity verification at high-risk moments establishes trust in the human. You need both to close the gap between someone possessing the right device and someone actually authorized to use it.”

It’s once again time to patch all the things. But this time the urgency is clear. Though it would make life a whole lot easer if flaws like this didn’t exist.

75 million Revolut records allegedly for sale on cybercrime forum

Posted in Commentary with tags on July 27, 2026 by itnerd

A threat actor has just listed a database allegedly containing 75 million records of Revolut customers on a cybercrime forum. The threat actor posted over 100 sample records. 

Cybernews researchers have investigated the dataset. Here’s what was included:

  • Partial credit card data: last 4 card digits, card type, expiration dates, and card statuses (active, blocked, frozen, etc).
  • User credentials: bcrypt or argon2id hashes, timestamps when the credentials were rotated.
  • User personal data: emails, full names, phone numbers, resident countries, addresses, currency, registration IP address, and other account identifiers
  • Other sensitive data: including device models, operational systems, and timestamps.

Cybernews has reached out to Revolut for comment. The company’s spokesperson said they are aware of the claims. However, they “see no indications of any breach.”

Cybernews researchers could not verify the claimed number of records and remain skeptical about the claimed scope of the dataset. If the dataset really contains 75 million records, the $500 price tag advertised on the illicit marketplace is unusually low for a leak of that size.

If the claims prove to be legitimate, the exposed information could pose serious risks. “Affected individuals may be at risk of social engineering attacks and identity profiling. Attackers may also attempt to gather full payment method information,” Cybernews researchers warned.

For more information, here’s the full report: https://cybernews.com/security/revolut-data-breach-75-million-records/

Inside DEF CON: New documentary offers first look behind closed doors in 13 years

Posted in Commentary with tags on July 27, 2026 by itnerd

For the first time since 2013, a documentary crew got access inside DEF CON, the world’s largest and most secretive hacker conference held annually in Las Vegas. The film features exclusive interviews with senior DEF CON figures, Black Badge winners, and even DARPA officials. The documentary will premiere on Cybernews’ YouTube channel on August 3rd.

This film explores how the past decade has changed not only public perception of hacker culture, but the community itself. As the line between hacking and defence has blurred, DEF CON now attracts everyone from teenagers to cybersecurity professionals to government agencies. 

Using personal archives from the community’s original creators and exclusive behind-the-scenes access, the documentary looks back at DEF CON’s early days and shows how far the community has come.

A promise to tell the truth

DEF CON has strict filming rules, and most previous coverage has rarely gone beyond vlogger-style footage. The Cybernews crew got exclusive sit-down interviews and tells the story of how the conference has changed from a small gathering into an event that now includes even government-organized competitions, including efforts to hack Air Force satellites.

‘Hacker’ through the eyes of the community

The community has long been followed by the myth that hackers are criminals. According to Moss, that perception dates back to the early 1990s, when reporters were trying to explain a new type of crime involving computers.

More than a decade of change: from parties to the US Air Force

Looking at DEF CON’s history, what used to be an old-school, underground hacker gathering with pranks and partying has evolved into something far broader. Today, it attracts professional coders, young people building careers in cybersecurity, and government officials. DARPA has held competitions at the conference, including the Cyber Grand Challenge and the more recent AI Cyber Challenge. 

When the US Air Force wanted more people to develop the skills needed to evaluate satellite security, it created the Hack-a-Sat competition at DEF CON and, in its final year, launched a satellite just for competing teams to attack.

The documentary will be publicly available on Cybernews’ YouTube channel starting August 3.

A-list directors, actors, and celebrities exposed in major film festival data breach

Posted in Commentary with tags on July 26, 2026 by itnerd

Cybersecurity researcher Jeremiah Fowler recently discovered and reported to ExpressVPN about multiple unsecured databases containing records linked to the Tribeca Film Festival. The exposed data included, but was not limited to:

  • 666,369 total records across three unsecured databases labeled “development,” “staging,” and “production,” spanning records from 2019 to 2026.
  • A production backup file with 295,916 records containing sensitive PII — email addresses, phone numbers, IP addresses, and hashed passwords — tied to users, film contacts, and more.
  • Confidential documents, press kits, and marketing materials, some explicitly marked as confidential, potentially exposing A-list talent and industry professionals associated with the festival.

Jeremiah’s full findings and key takeaways are published on this blog: https://www.expressvpn.com/blog/tribeca-film-festival-data-exposed/

AI agent claims to have found 19 Redis zero-days and built a working exploit in 27 minutes 

Posted in Commentary with tags on July 24, 2026 by itnerd

Researcher Chaofan Shou claims that Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3 agents autonomously found 19 Redis zero-day vulnerabilities in about 90 minutes, then built a working remote-code-execution exploit for one of them in 27 minutes. 

That’s charming. Actually it isn’t. I’ll get to that in a moment. Now I am going to get to some commentary by Arti Raman, CEO & Founder, Portal26

“Whether the specific numbers in this claim hold up under scrutiny or not almost doesn’t matter. What matters is that the capability being described, AI agents autonomously chaining vulnerability discovery into a working exploit in under half an hour, is no longer hypothetical. The question every enterprise running AI agents internally should be asking isn’t ‘could this happen to us,’ it’s ‘would we even know if it did.’ Most organizations have no visibility into what their own AI agents are actually doing with the access and tooling they’ve been given, which means an agent operating outside its intended scope wouldn’t look like an attack, it would just look like normal activity in a system nobody’s watching closely enough. You cannot govern what you cannot see, and right now most enterprises can’t see their AI agents at all.”

Roman Sannikov, Global Research Coordinator, iCOUNTER follows with this:

“The verified part of this story is notable enough on its own: two new Redis vulnerability classes, both patched, both capable of chaining memory corruption into full remote code execution. The unverified part, that a set of AI agents found 19 of these in 90 minutes and built a working exploit in 27, is the part worth treating carefully. Redis confirmed the flaws and the fixes. Nobody has independently verified the count, the timing, or how much of this actually happened without a human steering it.

That said, I wouldn’t dismiss it. We’ve been tracking a real trend of AI compressing the gap between a patch landing and a working exploit existing, and if even a fraction of this claim holds up, it’s consistent with that trend, not a departure from it. The takeaway defenders should draw from this isn’t ‘AI found 19 zero-days in 90 minutes,’ it’s that tools capable of something close to that now exist and are being tested in public. Whether this specific run is accurate or exaggerated, the capability itself isn’t hypothetical anymore, and threat intelligence teams should treat

At this point, I would assume that your opposition is using AI to attack you. Therefore you need to make sure that your defenses take that into account or you will be pwned.

UPDATE: Jacob Krell, Sr. Director: Secure AI Solutions & Cybersecurity, Suzu Labs (https://www.linkedin.com/in/jacob-krell) had this to say

“Intel’s Prescott chip hit 3.8 GHz in 2004 and Intel killed it because raw clock speed had become the wrong metric. K3’s 2.8 trillion parameter headline is the AI equivalent.

“The race now is efficiency, which K3’s own architecture proves with a sparse Mixture-of-Experts activating only 50 billion parameters per token at 2.5x K2’s scaling efficiency. Moonshot can give the weights away because you need 64 accelerators to serve them, and the moat is the deployment stack, not the weights themselves. The AI race will likely go to whoever puts GPT-4-class capability on consumer GPUs, not whoever adds another trillion parameters to their leading frontier model.”

Interestingly, Jacob explored this broader trend before this week’s news in a recent blog, arguing that AI’s next leap wouldn’t be smarter models – it would be AI becoming efficient enough to solve practical problems at scale. The Redis findings are an early proof point of that thesis. 

You can read it here. https://suzulabs.com/suzu-labs-blog/the-ai-industrys-prescott-moment