Here’s another tidbit from the document that I posted yesterday. Bell is claiming that it’s throttling of Internet connections aids innovation:
“Several parties have claimed that traffic management will hinder innovation. The Commission should see these claims for what they really are: the use of policy rhetoric devoid of substance in order to promote vested business interests. Indeed, the opposite of these claims is clearly the case; necessity is the mother of invention. Without any regard to network capacity, P2P file sharing application designers could develop applications designed to use all of the bandwidth that is available.”
Are these guys living in the Twilight Zone? What could ever possess them to say that? Hopefully the CRTC should see these claims for what they really are: the use of policy rhetoric devoid of substance in order to promote the vested business interests of Bell.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
This entry was posted on July 14, 2008 at 3:56 pm and is filed under Commentary with tags Bell, CRTC, Net Neutrality. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Bell Canada Says Throttling Aids Innovation…. WTF?
Here’s another tidbit from the document that I posted yesterday. Bell is claiming that it’s throttling of Internet connections aids innovation:
“Several parties have claimed that traffic management will hinder innovation. The Commission should see these claims for what they really are: the use of policy rhetoric devoid of substance in order to promote vested business interests. Indeed, the opposite of these claims is clearly the case; necessity is the mother of invention. Without any regard to network capacity, P2P file sharing application designers could develop applications designed to use all of the bandwidth that is available.”
Are these guys living in the Twilight Zone? What could ever possess them to say that? Hopefully the CRTC should see these claims for what they really are: the use of policy rhetoric devoid of substance in order to promote the vested business interests of Bell.
Share this:
Like this:
Related
This entry was posted on July 14, 2008 at 3:56 pm and is filed under Commentary with tags Bell, CRTC, Net Neutrality. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.