Archive for Bell

« Older Entries

Bell Ignored Ransom Demand Prior To Data Breach

Posted in Commentary with tags , on May 19, 2017 by itnerd

Earlier this week I told you about Bell having customer data leak and the possibility that more leaks would be coming. It now seems that the reason for the leak was the fact that Bell ignored a ransom demand from the hacker behind this. Here’s what The Financial Post had to say:

“A demand for payment was made by the hacker, but it was not paid,” Bell spokesman Marc Choma said via email on Tuesday. “We did not reply to their demand.”

You can completely understand why Bell didn’t pay. It would have opened the floodgates for extortion. But you still have to wonder how this happened in the first place? Bell isn’t exactly offering up those details. But the Canadian Privacy Commissioner is investigating and if they discover that Bell dropped the ball, we’ll be told pretty darn quick.

Advertisements

Leave a comment »

BREAKING: Bell Customer Info Leaked… More Leaks May Be Coming

Posted in Commentary with tags on May 15, 2017 by itnerd

CBC is breaking a story where 1.9 million Bell customer email addresses and some other info have been leaked by a hacker and more may be coming:

It is not clear when the breach occurred, how the data was accessed, or how long the attacker had access to Bell’s systems.

A person or group alleging to be behind the attack wrote in a post online that they were “releasing a significant portion of Bell.ca’s data due to the fact that they have failed to cooperate with us.”

“This shows how Bell doesn’t care for its customers safety and they could have avoided this public announcement,” the post continues. “Bell, if you don’t cooperate more will leak :)”

Bell has apologized for the leak, and affected customers have been contacted, but questions remain. How did this happen? And what will Bell do to ensure that this never happens again? How about the fact that it looks like this hacker was communicating with Bell? What was that all about? There’s serious questions here that Bell needs addressing. I want to see a response from Bell that is fulsome and complete when it comes to this. But knowing Bell, that likely won’t happen. Though, they are free to surprise me.

1 Comment »

Globe & Mail Discusses Bell & Rogers Rollouts Of Gigabit Internet

Posted in Commentary with tags , on March 31, 2017 by itnerd

There’s an interesting article in The Globe & Mail today that talks about the rollout of Gigabit Internet in Canada and the costs and challenges associated with that rollout for Bell and Rogers. Here’s a snippet of what I am talking about:

“Rogers has completed its upgrade to the next generation of cable technology (known as DOCSIS 3.1) and said Thursday that between itself and BCE, the city of Toronto is now covered by gigabit Internet services.”

“It costs cable companies such as Rogers and Videotron Ltd., which is BCE’s biggest competitor in Quebec, about $250 to $300 a home to upgrade their networks and provide gigabit speeds, according to an estimate by Desjardins Securities Inc. analyst Maher Yaghi. In contrast, he estimates it costs BCE from $1,000 to $1,500 a home to make its fibre-to-the-home upgrades.

However, in both Toronto and Montreal, BCE is making use of aerial options – such as hydro poles – to string its cables, which is cheaper than building underground. Barclay’s Capital analyst Phillip Huang estimates it costs about $400 to $700 to connect homes using aerial infrastructure. He said that while 60 per cent of the build in Toronto had to be done through buried infrastructure, it will only be about 10 per cent in Montreal.”

This explains to some degree why Rogers and Bell have been engaged in battle to grab as many users as possible. They have to recoup the costs of this rollout somehow. I suspect that this will escalate over the next few months. That means that users will win because prices for Gigabit Internet will drop because of the competition between the two. If you’re in the market for Gigabit Internet, see if both Bell and Rogers can service your area with that service. If they can, I can say from personal experience that you’ll have leverage over both to get the best deal that you can. Especially if you bundle your services.

Leave a comment »

Bell, Rogers & Vidéotron Targeting Android TV Box Sellers…. Why This Is A #Fail

Posted in Commentary with tags , , on December 20, 2016 by itnerd

The CBC reported yesterday that Bell, Rogers and Vidéotron are using the court system to go after those in Canada who sell Android TV boxes which give you “free TV”. All you need to do is to supply high speed Internet and you’re good to go. Now you can completely understand why those three companies want to take out people who sell boxes like these. They see it as copyright infringement and they feel that they have to go after them. There’s a second reason though. They’re also afraid that people who have these boxes will cut the cord which will cut off some lucrative revenue from those customers. The cynic in me says that it’s more the second reason than the first. Regardless, there’s a problem with what they’re doing. It’s not going to work.

The fact that Canadians are gravitating towards these boxes is a sign as obvious as the Bat Signal that Bell, Rogers & Vidéotron are not meeting the needs of Canadians with what they offer for TV services. I’ve always said that if you offer consumers a decent product for a fair price, they will have zero incentive to pirate anything. Unfortunately none of these companies do that. As a result you have this situation. If Bell, Rogers & Vidéotron really wanted to address this, they could simply provide more choice at lower prices. If they did, the Android box market would be dead tomorrow.

But clearly these three companies don’t see things that way and it’s going to cost them in the end because as fast as they try to take one of these sellers out, two more will pop in their place. Plus there’s also the option of customers building their own Android TV boxes which frankly isn’t that hard. So what are they going to do then? Hunt down every subscriber and sue them? That wouldn’t be really productive or cost effective. Not to mention that the optics of that would really suck.

The cable TV companies have to simply admit that this horse has already left the barn. Thus they should address the real issue which is their pricing and the lack of choice. If they did that, I believe that they would find it to be more effective in encouraging consumers not to cut the cord.

So how about it Bell, Rogers and Vidéotron?

2 Comments »

Bell To Buy MTS

Posted in Commentary with tags , on May 2, 2016 by itnerd

The news is out that Bell is going to buy MTS which is Manitoba Telecom for just under $4 billion. The reason why this will suck is that it will likely reduce competition in the Canadian telco space. To head that off, Bell is also going to see some subscribers and dealers in a separate transaction to Telus. The deal is said to be friendly for what it’s worth.

My take on this goes something like this. Those in Manitoba can fully expect their rates for telco services to go up as they’ll be less competition to  keep rates at a reasonable level. But of course that assumes that this deal will clear all the usual hurdles from people such as the CRTC and the Competition Bureau of Canada. I fully expect that it will which means that this deal will really suck for those in Manitoba.

Leave a comment »

CraveTV Now Live To All Canadians

Posted in Commentary with tags on January 14, 2016 by itnerd

Okay…. Bell was 14 days late in terms of launching CraveTV to all Canadians (as they promised January 1st as I noted here). But Bell has announced that it’s here and anyone can get it. After a one-month free trial, CraveTV will cost you $7.99 a month. Seeing as they have an exclusive licensing deal with HBO, that may make it worth it for someone to sign up.

So, are you going to sign up? Post a comment and share your thoughts.

Leave a comment »

Bell Pulling A Bait And Switch When It comes To CraveTV Launch Date?

Posted in Commentary with tags on December 30, 2015 by itnerd

If you were looking forward to CraveTV launching to all Canadians on January 1st, you’re going to be a bit disappointed. Many outlets including yours truly reported the January 1st launch date that would open up the streaming service to those who aren’t Bell customers. Now it seems that MobileSyrup has caught onto a “bait and switch” of some sort by Bell who owns CraveTV where the launch date has quietly changed:

So as we do when we revisit a story, we went back to the original article, clicked on the original source (I know, hard-hitting journalism here, right?) and found that the original press release is no longer valid. Instead, the company retconned the original (Berenstain Bears, much?) to make it appear as if that January 1st date was never offered in the first place. Now, the press release, still dated July 13th, says it “will become available direct to consumers in January, 2016.”

Well, the folks at MobileSyrup might want to check out CNW as that’s where I got the original press release from which still says January 1st as I linked to that press release when the announcement was made. So, what gives Bell? Do you not have enough integrity to admit that you can’t launch on January 1st? Thus you try to rewrite history hoping that nobody notices? That’s pretty low if that’s the case.

I can’t wait to see how they explain this one. Assuming that they ever do explain it. Which knowing Bell, they won’t.

1 Comment »

« Older Entries