Recast, in partnership with Nerdio and VMblog, today released the findings of the 2026 State of VDI Survey in a new report, “VDI Isn’t Done. It’s Being Reworked.” The results show that VDI remains part of the workspace mix, but many IT teams are changing how they operate, secure, and support these environments. Notably, administrators lack confidence in their ability to patch VDI environments in a timely manner, making them prone to risk.
VDI is not being abandoned, but it is being actively retooled
Contrary to industry lore, VDI isn’t dead. However, it is evolving. Only 2% of respondents planned to exit an existing deployment entirely in the next 12 to 18 months, while 49% of current users reported a significant change to their VDI, Cloud PC, or published application environment over the last two years. Plans were mixed across keeping, expanding, replacing, reducing, evaluating, or starting deployments, which points to active modernization rather than a broad move away from VDI.
VDI teams lack confidence that their environments are being patched on time
The survey highlights a patch confidence gap between operations and security. Among current users, only 34% were very or extremely confident that required operating system and third-party application updates were being applied on time. Security concerns extended beyond access, with 47% citing audit logging and traceability, 41% citing data leakage controls, and 31% citing patch or vulnerability exposure windows. Although confidence is not proof of failure, it is an important operating signal. Secure access matters, but teams also need timely updates, clear reporting, and proof that controls are working.
The real cost of VDI is the burden of everyday operational work
Performance variability was the top operational pain point at 41%, but 53% of current users cited at least one lifecycle-related issue, including image management and update effort, application delivery or updates, or user profiles and personalization. Additionally, 32% of current users cited high ongoing cost, and 61% of those asked about barriers to change cited budget constraints. Together, the findings suggest that much of the cost and friction in VDI comes from the everyday work of keeping environments current, usable, and supportable.
The report is based on a significant number of responses from IT professionals with awareness of VDI, Cloud PCs, and published applications. Percentages are rounded, and some questions were multi-select.
Related
This entry was posted on June 30, 2026 at 9:35 am and is filed under Commentary with tags Recast. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
New data on future of VDI and workspace delivery put out by Recast Software
Recast, in partnership with Nerdio and VMblog, today released the findings of the 2026 State of VDI Survey in a new report, “VDI Isn’t Done. It’s Being Reworked.” The results show that VDI remains part of the workspace mix, but many IT teams are changing how they operate, secure, and support these environments. Notably, administrators lack confidence in their ability to patch VDI environments in a timely manner, making them prone to risk.
VDI is not being abandoned, but it is being actively retooled
Contrary to industry lore, VDI isn’t dead. However, it is evolving. Only 2% of respondents planned to exit an existing deployment entirely in the next 12 to 18 months, while 49% of current users reported a significant change to their VDI, Cloud PC, or published application environment over the last two years. Plans were mixed across keeping, expanding, replacing, reducing, evaluating, or starting deployments, which points to active modernization rather than a broad move away from VDI.
VDI teams lack confidence that their environments are being patched on time
The survey highlights a patch confidence gap between operations and security. Among current users, only 34% were very or extremely confident that required operating system and third-party application updates were being applied on time. Security concerns extended beyond access, with 47% citing audit logging and traceability, 41% citing data leakage controls, and 31% citing patch or vulnerability exposure windows. Although confidence is not proof of failure, it is an important operating signal. Secure access matters, but teams also need timely updates, clear reporting, and proof that controls are working.
The real cost of VDI is the burden of everyday operational work
Performance variability was the top operational pain point at 41%, but 53% of current users cited at least one lifecycle-related issue, including image management and update effort, application delivery or updates, or user profiles and personalization. Additionally, 32% of current users cited high ongoing cost, and 61% of those asked about barriers to change cited budget constraints. Together, the findings suggest that much of the cost and friction in VDI comes from the everyday work of keeping environments current, usable, and supportable.
The report is based on a significant number of responses from IT professionals with awareness of VDI, Cloud PCs, and published applications. Percentages are rounded, and some questions were multi-select.
Share this:
Like this:
Related
This entry was posted on June 30, 2026 at 9:35 am and is filed under Commentary with tags Recast. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.