A few days ago, DeepSeek was setting the world on fire because the AI that it put on the table offered strong LLM performance at a much lower cost to train. That made heads explode. But heads are exploding again with news that cybersecurity researchers from Wiz have found a ClickHouse database owned by Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek containing over a million lines of chat history and sensitive information. The database was publicly accessible and allowed the researchers full control over database operations. That too made heads explode. And this is on top of attacks DeepSeek.
Gunter Ollmann, CTO, Cobalt had this to say:
“The DeepSeek exposure highlights a critical and recurring issue—organizations, especially those innovating rapidly in AI, often prioritize speed over security. Wiz’s discovery reinforces the importance of proactive security testing, particularly as attack surfaces expand with cloud-based infrastructure and publicly accessible APIs. Given DeepSeek’s recent global recognition and growth in the AI space, the breach could have had a huge impact, significantly affecting businesses and individuals relying on their services, with potential ripple effects across industries.
This case underscores why organizations must continuously evaluate the robustness of their defensive controls —not just to meet compliance, but to protect sensitive data and improve their risk posture. Offensive security, including penetration testing and attack surface monitoring, is essential in identifying these open doors before adversaries do. AI-driven platforms like DeepSeek must integrate security testing into their development lifecycle, ensuring rigorous assessments of infrastructure, access controls, and data handling policies.
AI may be “new” but the basics of security processes and controls still apply.
As AI companies become integral to critical infrastructure, security can’t be an afterthought. The industry needs to adopt a proactive mindset—regular pentesting, red teaming, and continuous attack surface monitoring—to safeguard both intellectual property and customer trust.”
The more I hear about DeepSeek, the more I think that this is an AI that should be avoided. They don’t seem to have their act together, and that’s on top of them being based in China which by itself should set off alarm bells.


macOS Sequoia 15.3 Fixes An Annoyance That I Tripped Over… Are Other Issues Fixed As Well?
Posted in Commentary on January 31, 2025 by itnerdmacOS Sequoia has been a bit of a mess in terms of the quality of the software since it was released. I say that because there were a number of issues and oddities that quite honestly, shouldn’t had made it to the streets. In fact, I have been actively telling my clients not to upgrade their Macs until a lot of these issues get sorted. With the release of 15.3 earlier this week, things might be improving.
Back in mid December when macOS 15.2 hit the streets, there was something odd that I tripped over. When a Mac such as my Mac mini was plugged into a TV via HDMI, it would show the icon in the menu bar that the screen was being mirrored. This would not happen if you had the same computer plugged into a monitor. I later discovered that it was apparently a change that Apple made. At the time I said this:
I honestly wish Apple found some more elegant method of doing this. I say that because I am sure that the AppleCare helpline is being hit with calls regarding this, which is something that could have been avoided by a better UI design. But what do I know? After all Apple knows best right?
I guess Apple must have figured out that this wasn’t a good change to make because in macOS Sequoia 15.3, it no longer shows that a Mac plugged into a TV over HDMI is being mirrored. I can only think of two reasons why this was fixed:
Either way, I am glad that Apple addressed this as this is one thing that is off my list of annoyances with Sequoia. Now in case you were wondering, here’s some other issues and oddities that I have been tracking since Sequoia came out:
That I can confirm is accurate via the WayBack Machine as the text on that page was completely different in late 2024. On the surface, it seems that Apple has made another design decision that was poorly communicated. Why Apple insists on doing these design changes and not telling anyone, I do not know. But it looks like we’re done with this issue as Apple clearly is done with this issue.
Now if Apple has fixed the Time Machine issues, I would start to feel comfortable enough with recommending it to my clients. That’s because many of my clients who aren’t businesses or enterprises use Time Machine to back up. Thus the fact that it doesn’t work reliably is a hard no for many of my clients. Stay tuned to see if that has been fixed, or if we’re going to be waiting until Apple decides that is something worthy of getting a fix from them instead of focusing totally on that dumpster fire known as Apple Intelligence.
UPDATE: It doesn’t fix the ongoing issues with Time Machine. Sigh.
Leave a comment »