I am not a journaling type of person. Likely because I have not seen the need for doing that. But I may change my mind on that after reviewing Rosebud which is billed as an AI based “interactive journal and self-care companion”. I’ve been using it for the last couple of weeks to journal my daily experiences and thoughts.

For the most part I have been using the Morning Intention and Evening Reflection to get my thoughts, feelings and experiences into the app. You can also see from the screen shot above a prompt for “What small focus can bring you joy today?” Regardless of the section that you enter your thoughts in, you’re prompted with questions like “What’s your top priority today?” and “What was the highlight of your day?” That helped me get my thoughts into the app easier. The app will prompt you to go deeper to provide it more detail. And when you’re done, the AI will presents its thoughts and insights. This is where I found Rosebud to be really helpful. The AI looked at my first week and found the following insights from their AI:

And on top of that, it give me a look at my wins for the week.

Some of this stuff, specifically that I might benefit from exploring what specifically about my work feels misaligned with my working style, is new to me. It gave me something to think about as maybe my working style isn’t working in my favour.
Now let’s go down the rabbit hole on their AI and your data. Because if you’re typing your thoughts, feelings and experiences into an app, you have to know what is going to happen with all of that. The company’s Privacy Policy does note that it has agreements OpenAI, Anthropic, and Groq to not store your data, and to not pass along personally identifiable information. That’s good. On top of that, have BAAs and Zero Data Retention (ZDR) agreements in place which forces those companies to handle data in compliance with HIPAA standards. Which is also good. The rest of the doesn’t have anything that jumps out at me as being bad or concerning, other than the fact that the company has not conducted third party security risk assessments which I found in section 5 under “Security Audits”. If I could give Rosebud a piece of advice from someone who does IT security among other things for a living, you might want to get third parties looking at your setup and report on what they find and how you remedy any concerns that they find as that will give your users that extra piece of mind. Finally, you can lock down Rosebud using Face ID if you have an iPhone. Meaning that if someone somehow gets physical access to your unlocked iPhone, your private thoughts will stay safe.
Rosebud is free to download. But if you really want the full experience that I had, you can sign up for $12.99 USD a month or $107.99 USD a year. I have to admit that this was an app that was worth it for me to use. And I will continue to use it to see what sort of additional insights about myself that I can gain from from it. If you’re looking for the same thing, I say give it a try.
Digital IDs: 50 countries ranked by digital ID requirements and privacy risks
Posted in Commentary with tags Comparitech on November 19, 2025 by itnerdMore and more, Digital IDs are hailed by governments as a convenient way to prevent identity theft, access key services (e.g., health and social welfare benefits), and create efficient systems. And, as the UK government is hoping to demonstrate, they may also help combat illegal immigration by making digital IDs a mandatory requirement for those seeking work.
Comparitech researchers have released an in-depth study comparing digital ID requirements and privacy risks across 50 countries, finding that already 37 countries have implemented digital ID schemes. Additionally, 9 more are in the process of creating them.
Additionally, this research comes along the same time that Apple has launched digital IDs for United States passport holders.
Rebecca Moody, Head of Data Research at Comparitech, provided the following commentary:
“It goes without saying that digital IDs have their advantages, from providing easy access to online services and streamlining government processes to always having access to your ID wherever you go (so long as you’ve got your phone).
But where digital IDs become a huge cause for concern from a privacy perspective is when they’re introduced as a mandatory requirement (or citizens find it difficult to perform certain tasks without one), they’re used to surveil citizens’ movements and activities, and/or they’re introduced under the guise of providing one solution but soon become needed to access other key services.
For example, Apple’s digital IDs for US passports will no doubt be a hugely convenient service for US citizens and domestic travelers as they’ll eliminate the need to carry a physical passport. And, as it stands, Apple says users’ use of the digital ID won’t be tracked. But, over time, it may be implemented in other sectors and for other services, which may increase the risk of surveillance and what is known as “function creep.” This is also the case with the UK’s proposed BritCard, which will only apply to those seeking work (at first), but will likely expand to include other government services in time.
Ultimately, digital IDs are often introduced as a convenient tool that might not seem to encroach on a user’s privacy too much. But, as more users adopt the ID and more services are added to it, it can quickly become an invasive method of government control. And, once they become mandatory (like the UK’s BritCard), there’s no going back.”
You can read the research here: https://www.comparitech.com/blog/vpn-privacy/digital-ids-study/
Leave a comment »