Elon Musk appears to have climbed down from fighting the fact his AI chatbot Grok was creating all sorts of content that should never, ever be allowed to create. To recap, after this was discovered, and the predictable backlash happened, Elon tried to paywall this. The result was unsurprisingly more backlash. Now he’s finally just killed the ability for Grok to make this sort of content at all:
Elon Musk’s Grok artificial intelligence chatbot will no longer edit “images of real people in revealing clothing” on the X platform, the company confirmed Wednesday evening, following global outrage after Grok was found to be complying with user requests to digitally undress images of adults and in some cases children.
“We have implemented technological measures to prevent the Grok account from allowing the editing of images of real people in revealing clothing such as bikinis. This restriction applies to all users, including paid subscribers,” X wrote via its Safety team account.
This may have had something to do with the fact that a whole lot of governments around the world were investigating Elon over this. After all, this sort of thing is illegal. And rightly so. But Elon doesn’t see it that way that only this man who clearly has issues, lots of issues, understands.
Anyway this isn’t over. Why? Well, there’s this:
It’s still extremely easy to undress women and edit them into sexualized poses using the X and Grok mobile apps or websites, however, even without making a subscription payment that would connect your account to an easily identifiable source. In her testing, my fellow UK-based colleague Jess Weatherbed found that she was not blocked from using Grok’s image editing feature to create sexualized deepfakes of herself.
After uploading a fully clothed photograph to X and Grok, prompting the chatbot to “put her in a bikini” or “remove her clothes” produced only blurred, censored results. The bot did comply with every other request, however, including prompts to “show me her cleavage,” “make her breasts bigger,” and “put her in a crop top and low-rise shorts” — the last of which placed her in a bikini. The bot also generated images of her “leaning down” with a sexualized pose and facial expression, and in extremely revealing lingerie.
Clearly ether he’s not taking this seriously, or whatever minions he has behind this are inept. While both could be true at the same time, I am going to go with he’s not taking this seriously. That’s pretty dumb from a guy who bills himself as the smartest guy in the room. And it’s likely going to cost him. Various governments are fed up with his antics and are likely to lower the boom on him to drive home the point that his behaviour is not acceptable by any standard. And I am her for when that happens.
Why Aren’t Apple And Google Acting To Remove Grok And X From Their App Stores?
Posted in Commentary with tags Apple, Google, Grok AI, Twitter on January 28, 2026 by itnerdI have to wonder where are the backbones of Tim Cook and Sundar Pichai are. I say that because it has been weeks since the whole Grok allowing users to create objectionable content thing blew up. To recap:
To the last point, the EU is one of a number of governments who are up in arms about this. And rightfully so. Elon Musk has simply gone too far and he needs to be punished for his actions. And the best way to punish him is to pull his apps from the Apple App Store and from the Google Play Store. But that hasn’t happened and you have to wonder why. Is it because Apple and Google don’t want to pick a fight with Elon? Is it because Tim Cook and Sundar Pichai are cowards? Is it about the money that these companies make from their cut of the subscriptions to Grok and X? Who knows?
But I do know this. Section 1.1.4 of Apple’s review rules prohibit the sort of thing that Grok and X are doing at the moment. Ditto for Google Play. Given that, why aren’t these companies enforcing their own rules?
The fact is it’s beyond time for Apple and Google to stand up, grow a pair, and throw Elon’s apps off their respective app stores. Along with any other app that does this sort of thing. Because by not doing so, they are burning the trust that they have with consumers that their apps stores are safe places to get apps from down to the ground. Along with that, it also sends the message that rules are rules, except when they are not.
Apple and Google, you both need to do better. Now.
Leave a comment »