This week, Instagram users woke up to something that is already being called The Great Purge of 2026, as the platform reportedly removed millions of fake user accounts, affecting many platform users’ follower numbers, including famous influencers and celebrities.
However, this isn’t an isolated event. Major social media platforms are constantly struggling to maintain the authenticity of their user bases. To put this in perspective, recent research from Surfshark shows that the most popular social media platforms collectively remove about 6.3 billion fake accounts and 11.1 billion pieces of spam content every year.
Tomas Stamulis, Chief Security Officer at Surfshark, shared his insights into the situation:
“While I’m convinced that the vast majority of fake accounts removed in Instagram’s latest purge were bots, I’m also sure that many legitimate users were caught in the crossfire. With the rapid evolution of AI, creating and managing bots that mimic human behavior has become incredibly simple. Instagram, being a highly visual platform, is particularly susceptible to this, as AI can easily fake engagement without the need for the complex, context-aware interactions you might see on platforms like LinkedIn.”
Stamulis notes that a purge of this scale wouldn’t be possible without the help of artificial intelligence and notes that while AI can really help with a bot problem, some legitimate accounts might be misidentified as bots in the process.
“No AI system is without its flaws, and a purge of this scale inevitably means that legitimate users get flagged as bots. A fundamental drawback of any AI system lies in its reliance on the data it was trained on. If the training data is biased or certain legitimate behaviors are underrepresented, the AI can misinterpret the actions of real users as inauthentic. For instance, if an individual consistently follows a large number of new accounts in a short period due to a niche interest or an event, the AI might interpret this as bot-like behavior, when in reality, it’s an authentic user action. These ‘false positives’ can lead not only to temporary inconvenience but also to lost revenue for businesses or damaged reputations for creators.”
If your legitimate Instagram account was impacted by the recent Instagram bot purge, a cybersecurity expert shared a few tips:
“First, immediately document everything by taking screenshots of your profile, follower count, and any notifications or error messages, as this evidence is crucial for your appeal. While going through Instagram’s official appeal process, avoid third-party services, as these can also be flagged as bot behavior. Be clear, concise, and human in your language, explaining your situation.”




Guest Post: Pressing political topics reduce people’s vigilance against bots
Posted in Commentary with tags Surfshark on May 19, 2026 by itnerdMore than 700 participants took part in a week-long experiment conducted by Surfshark and MSc students from Malmö University. Of them, 53% correctly identified more bots than they wrongly flagged humans as bots on the simulated social platforms. However, nearly half (47%) failed the task. A cybersecurity expert warns that the number of people unable to tell bots from real humans on social media will continue to grow rapidly.
“The ‘Bot or Not’ game and experiment help us keep connecting the dots and better understand the influence bad bots have on us, real social media users. Earlier this year, we found that major platforms remove over 6.3 billion fake accounts every year — roughly 47 times the annual number of babies born worldwide (around 135 million). Bots are being generated by the billions, and our latest experiment shows that half of the participants can no longer tell them apart from real people. This trend will accelerate, as the technology lets bots blend in seamlessly with real human profiles,” says Justas Pukys, Senior Product Manager at Surfshark.
When our emotions take over, bots thrive
The results of the recent social media bot experiment were eye-opening. The data suggests that engaging with sensitive political or social topics may reduce people’s ability to spot bots and make them more likely to falsely accuse real people.
The moment the “Bot or Not” simulation shifted to a more emotional tone, our participants’ bot-detection skills dropped. When the debate turned political and focused on immigration, participants’ bot-detection rate dropped to 54%, meaning that nearly half the social media bots slipped right past the players. Participants’ accuracy rate also declined to 63%, showing a spike in internet paranoia when participants accused humans of being bots.
The women’s rights topic presented the biggest bot-spotting challenges. The bot-detection rate crashed to 49%, meaning users missed more bots than they found. Worse, their accuracy rate fell to 61%, showing players most often accused real human content of being bot-generated.
“In comparison, while engaging in the data centers, a more technical debate for many, users performed the largest bot-detection rate of 71% (finding the majority of the bots), and a high (76%) accuracy rate. This suggests that when not directly emotionally triggered, we could detect more AI bots and are less likely to falsely accuse real humans,” explains Luís Costa, Research Lead at Surfshark.
The “Bot or Not” game is now online for everyone to play and take part.
Can we distinguish who is who on social platforms in the future?
“The experiment’s results are novel and significant. They suggest we can’t simply ‘read’ our way out of ‘botted’ social media. Bot-detection skills appear to be shaped by age, preferred platforms, and time spent on them. But the most striking finding was that our biggest blind spot is emotion: when debates get heated, it hijacks our digital radar.
To fight back against automated deception, we don’t need better textual analysis. We need a cooler head and a deeper awareness of our own vulnerabilities,” claims Luís Costa.
Justas Pukys, a cybersecurity expert at Surfshark, shares practical recommendations.
“Don’t forget to double-check the information you find on social media. Also, don’t take everything random users post at face value. Be careful when accepting and interacting with private messages that offer you prizes, invite you to click on strange links, or try to grab your attention with lines like ‘Your family member has been in an accident!’,” he advises.
The expert also highlights the importance of digital security hygiene, such as using anti-scam tools daily. They will help you analyze the content of emails, text messages, and websites and assess whether it has been generated by bots or other attackers.
This “Bot or Not” experiment inspired the launch of Surfshark’s Cybersecurity Advocacy Fund, which provides up to €100,000 in annual financial support distributed among students, researchers, and creative cybersecurity awareness initiatives worldwide. The upcoming application process will open in September 2026 — more information will follow.
METHODOLOGY
This bot-detection study analyzed data from 710 participants who played the interactive simulation “Bot or Not.” This machine and gameplay were created by Interaction Design students from Malmö University for the UNFOLD exhibition — a design competition for universities around the world during Milan Design Week, the world’s largest trade fair. Throughout the week-long public exhibition, visitors were invited to take part in the experiment.
Please find the full research methodology here.
Leave a comment »