Archive for January 19, 2017

Macchina M2 Is About To Launch On Kickstarter

Posted in Commentary with tags on January 19, 2017 by itnerd

Macchina M2 is a key to unlock the control center of your car. Once you are in, Macchina can then be used to make changes and tweaks to your car. You can do anything from simple projects like stopping that annoying ding to more complex upgrades like unlocking more horsepower or improving fuel economy. Macchina arrives to you as a blank key – you have to cut it yourself. Learning how to cut that key (reverse engineering, writing code, and plain-old tinkering) is the fun and challenging part, but don’t worry you can do it, because a community of car nerds already exists. The community supports each other and you by sharing what they have learned and discovered together.

1.png

M2 can take your car to the next level. Let it help you with performance tuning, diagnostics, customization, security, telematics, and most importantly prototyping! The only limit is your imagination and what this community of M2 fans can build!

This project is about to launch on Kickstarter. Click here for more info.

Apple Sued Because It Won’t Stop You From Texting And Driving

Posted in Commentary with tags on January 19, 2017 by itnerd

There’s a class action lawsuit in California that is targeting Apple because according to those who filed the lawsuit, they didn’t implement a lockout system to prevent texting while driving. It sounds like one of those lawsuits where someone is suing the deepest pockets that they can find, but I don’t think that’s the case. In short, I think the plaintiffs do have a point. Let me explain why that’s my view on this.

Even if I plug my iPhone into my car to use Apple CarPlay, it does not lock out the iPhone. That means for example that if I wanted to send a text using my hands rather than Siri, I could. The same is true if I wanted to interact with any application on my iPhone while driving. Contrast that with Android Auto where it limits what you can do. You can’t touch your phone when it’s connected to Android Auto. You can double press the multi-task switcher button and switch to another app, but the home button and back buttons won’t get you out of Android Auto. This is to stop people playing with their phones. When interacting with Android Auto, for example selecting a music track, the UI will not let you drill down anymore than 6 steps. One of the core principals for Android Auto is ease of use and Google is putting a hard limit on how long you can scroll, click and interact with before you can’t go any further.

Now where things get interesting is the fact that the lawsuit claims that Apple was granted a patent that describes a lock-out mechanism in 2014. So clearly, they saw this as an issue. I will also note that one real world example of a company who has implemented something like this is Mississauga based SOTI who via their enterprise mobility management software can do something similar to what the Apple patent describes. Thus the question is, why didn’t Apple implement this sort of functionality in iOS?  If they did, perhaps we would not be talking about this lawsuit right now.

Now there are some who are going to argue that it’s not up to tech companies to make up for the failings of humans, and that humans need to take ownership of their actions. I agree with that. However, I believe that if there’s a piece of technology can make things better and safer for humans, we should implement it if we can. Both having individual humans take responsibility for their actions and having tech that keeps us from doing dumb things should go hand in hand in my opinion.

As for Apple, perhaps they want to take a look at this as an opportunity for improvement that we’d all benefit from. So how about it Apple?

“The Man” Is Looking At Your Social Media Posts

Posted in Commentary with tags , on January 19, 2017 by itnerd

I want to bring you two stories from the CBC to highlight the fact that when you post to social media, nothing that you post is private. Ever.

Let’s start with this story where the Canada Revenue Agency is apparently monitoring social media to figure out if Canadian Taxpayers are cheating on their taxes. Presumably by people tweeting out pictures of their new car or boat that was bought with money that they owe to the taxman. Here’s what the Canada Revenue Agency has to say on this:

“The CRA does practice risk-based compliance, so for taxpayers identified as high risk, any relevant, publicly available information relating to the specific risk-based factors for the taxpayer may be consulted as part of our fact-gathering processes,” said spokesperson David Walters.

Among those considered high risk are wealthy Canadians with offshore bank accounts, said Jean-François Ruel, director of CRA’s Strategy and Integration Branch.

“If we go with high-risk, high-wealth individuals that do offshore [banking], then we would look at all information that is public for compliance action.”

But here’s the problem according to someone who spends all day every day looking at this stuff:

However, David Christopher, of the advocacy group Open Media, said his organization opposes government agencies monitoring what Canadians are saying on social media.

“When Canadians post something on Facebook, they believe that they are sharing that with their friends and with their family. They don’t believe that they are sharing that with some government bureaucrat in Ottawa,” he said.

“Unfortunately, Facebook’s privacy settings are notoriously complex and many people might think that they are posting something to their friends and it ends up getting shared with the whole world.”

My thoughts on this are that while this is problematic, it doesn’t cross the line into a place where it is offensive for reasons I will get to in a minute. But having said that, let’s take this discussion to the next level. This CBC story details a London Ontario based company who created software that violated Twitters terms of service to mine data on behalf of law enforcement:

A London, Ont., data mining company has been banned from Twitter and is being reviewed by Facebook for selling surveillance software to North American police services to monitor people at Black Lives Matter events and other public protests.

Media Sonar lost its Twitter privileges in October after it was revealed that the firm was in violation of the social media giant’s privacy policies.

“If Media Sonar creates other API keys [to connect with Twitter], we will terminate those as well and take further action as appropriate,” wrote Twitter spokesperson Nu Wexler. 

Public documents obtained through access to information requests show the company billed itself to police forces as the “only vendor that allows public safety agencies to view social accounts covertly.”

It also provided at least one police force in California with a list of keywords and hashtags, including #blacklivesmatter and #Weorganize, to help with “proactive policing.” 

Now this clearly crosses the line and is clearly offensive. Unlike the Canada Revenue Agency who walked up to the line because they were going after people that they would be investigating anyway through other means, Media Sonar went after anyone and turned that info over to the cops if they said the wrong thing on Twitter. Thus anyone could get roped up in this company’s dragnet. That’s a #EpicFail because while you shouldn’t expect to have privacy in a public forum like social media, you shouldn’t expect to be spied on either if you’ve done nothing wrong. Hopefully this award winning company loses some of those awards and gets the message that this is a far from acceptable as you can get.

It should also send a clear message to users of Facebook, Twitter, and other social media platforms. You are being watched. It may not be right, but it is the case. Govern yourself accordingly.