Archive for August 18, 2026

Claude AI Was Down… A Lot

Posted in Commentary with tags on August 18, 2026 by itnerd

It has been reported that yesterday, Claude experienced a major outage, with users reporting login problems and degraded performance across several Anthropic services. The incident began on August 16, 2026, at around 21:58 UTC, and is affecting Claude.ai, Claude Code, and Claude Cowork.

According to Anthropic’s status page, the company first said it was investigating an issue preventing some users from authenticating to Claude.ai, Claude Code, and Claude Cowork.

A few minutes later, Anthropic reported a broader service disruption involving degraded performance on Claude.ai and platform.claude.com

The full story can be found here: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/artificial-intelligence/anthropic-confirms-claude-is-down-in-major-outage-affecting-multiple-services/

Commenting on this, Jamie Beckland, CPO at APIContext, said: 

“Outages like this are a reminder that AI services are quickly becoming critical infrastructure. When Claude goes down, the impact isn’t limited to a chatbot — it can interrupt developers using Claude Code, employees relying on Cowork, and applications built around Anthropic’s API platform. Over the past several months, our monitoring shows that Anthropic’s issues have become more frequent.

Every complex distributed application will experience outages. That’s why Claude customers need to know when the service is failing, understand which workflows are affected, and fall back gracefully rather than discovering the problem from their users. As companies embed AI deeper into production workflows, m

Claude seems to be down a lot based on their status page. If organizations rely on AI, then they need uptime guaranteed. Otherwise they are wasting their time.

Smart Brands Prepare for Black Friday in August Before Ad Costs Climb 18% and Competition Jumps 40%

Posted in Commentary with tags on August 18, 2026 by itnerd

New Billo data shows Meta ad competition rising about 40% and the cost to reach 1,000 impressions climbing roughly 18% between August and the November Black Friday peak. Brands that wait until fall to plan their campaigns enter an auction that is already crowded and expensive, with the outcome largely shaped by creative built weeks earlier. Black Friday and Cyber Monday together make up the single largest ecommerce advertising event of the year, and the brands that prepare earliest tend to capture a disproportionate share of that spending.

Billo, which connects brands with creators to produce social video ads for platforms including TikTok, Meta and YouTube, has tracked the same pattern in its own client data. Donatas Smailys, co-founder and CEO of Billo, said brands that enter Black Friday without tested creative end up paying more for weaker results, regardless of how much they spend.

Why August Is the Right Time to Start

September and October are when brands learn which ads actually convert, and that testing takes weeks. August gives brands exactly enough time to brief creators, film several options, and get results back before Black Friday begins.

Brands that follow this approach typically produce three to five short variants per product, each testing a different angle: a different opening line, a different creator, or a different pain point. The variants that perform best organically become the ads brands scale with paid budget once Q4 begins.

Methodology

Figures are based on Billo client Meta ad data, tracked monthly from June through December 2025. Comparisons reflect August 2025 against the November 2025 peak, and where noted, December. Cost per 1,000 impressions reached is a derived figure, calculated as total spend divided by total impressions, multiplied by 1,000; it is not a reported column in the underlying data.

Cybernews Launches the AI Trustworthiness Ranking, Assessing 500 AI Companies

Posted in Commentary with tags on August 18, 2026 by itnerd

Cybernews has launched the AI Trustworthiness Ranking, a new project assessing 500 AI companies from 36 countries based on publicly available information related to security, data privacy, organizational transparency, and public perception. Each company receives a Trustworthiness Score from 0 to 100, calculated from the four weighted pillars.

Companies scoring 75+ are designated AI Trustworthiness Leaders of 2026. The ranking covers 21 AI categories, ranging from AI assistants and productivity tools to coding, music, and creative platforms. The Ranking will be updated yearly.

The AI Trustworthiness Ranking aims to help people understand which AI companies they can trust. With hundreds of AI tools available, it can be difficult to know how responsibly the companies behind them operate or what happens to users’ data once they start using their products. 

The Ranking is guided by an Advisory Board of experts in AI, cybersecurity, and technology, who provide external expertise and perspectives on the project.

Google’s Gemini tops the list

According to the Ranking, the ten most trustworthy AI companies are Google (Gemini), Krisp, Fireflies.ai, Adobe, Magnific, Writesonic, Veryfi, Salesforce, Grammarly, and Lovable.

Companies in the Office & Productivity category achieved the highest average Trustworthiness score at 78 out of 100, while Music & Audio ranked lowest, with an average score of 54.

Of the four pillars assessed, security received the lowest average score at just 32 out of 100, while organizational transparency was the strongest-performing pillar, with an average score of 90 out of 100. 

Nearly two-thirds of AI companies lack clear disclosures on AI training

For the Data Privacy pillar, Cybernews analyzed the privacy policies of all 500 companies to assess how clearly they explain how they collect, share, use, and retain user data.

The analysis found that 63% of companies do not clearly disclose whether they use user data to train their AI models. Of these, 42% do not address AI training on user data in their privacy policies at all, while 21% provide only vague information.

Data retention disclosures showed a similar pattern. 65% of companies do not clearly disclose how long they retain user data. 9% don’t mention anything about retention or deletion, while 56% only mention it vaguely, without any precise retention periods.

Explore the full AI Trustworthiness Ranking and individual company scores here: https://cybernews.com/ai-knowledge-base/ai-trustworthiness-ranking-2026/

Space raises $2.4M led by a16z Speedrun to build the AI-native filesystem for humans and agents

Posted in Commentary with tags on August 18, 2026 by itnerd

Cloud storage was supposed to make computers feel limitless. Yet workflows remain constrained by the disk inside each device. The cloud gave data another place to live, but not a better way to reach it. 

People are still forced to upload, download, sync, duplicate, and search for files before work can begin. Agents face an even larger bottleneck: data must often be copied, ingested, indexed, or uploaded into a separate tool before an agentic workflow can be unlocked.

Space was built around a different idea: every application, person, and agent should be able to work from the same live filesystem, with data available the moment it is needed. If compute can become effectively unlimited in the cloud, storage should work the same way.

Today, Space announced a $2.4 million pre-seed round led by a16z Speedrun, with participation from Golden Ventures, Northside Ventures, and a dozen angel investors with backgrounds across prosumer and enterprise software such as Parsec, Sentry, Stan, Superwhisper, and Modem.

Space is building an AI-native distributed filesystem that collapses the cloud and local drive into one shared data layer. It allows applications, teammates, and agents to access the same live files as if they were stored locally, without full-file downloads, duplicated copies, or application-specific integrations.

The cloud solved storage. AI makes access the new bottleneck.

The industry has spent decades optimizing where data is stored, but the harder problem is making it instantly accessible to the people and agents that need it.

As companies manage increasingly large design files, codebases, datasets, media libraries, and machine-generated outputs across clouds, drives, and devices, traditional storage still requires data to be moved or copied before work can begin. Humans wait for transfers. Agents wait for ingestion pipelines, connectors, and duplicated context. Both are forced to organize their workflows around where data is stored, slowing progress, limiting collaboration, and increasing security risks.

Space is building a new access layer directly above the operating system, where every application, person, and agent can reach the same live data through the filesystem itself.

Space’s bet is simple: the next storage layer that unlocks the future should make files instantly usable where work already happens, within the native apps and agentic systems teams already use.

What Space is building: One filesystem for every application, person, and agent

Built directly above the operating system, Space makes cloud-hosted files behave like local ones. Files appear in Finder and open in existing native applications without a download or permanent local copy. When an application or agent requests data, Space streams only the exact byte ranges required, in real time, to complete the task.

That changes what cloud storage can feel like. A video editor can open a project larger than the computer in front of them without waiting. An architect can work on a building model whose assets stream only as the application needs them. A developer can work across an entire repository without storing it on a laptop. An agent can traverse an entire organization’s context through a shared filesystem and read only the portions of each file relevant to its task.

This is what sets Space apart from Dropbox, Box, and Google Drive. Those tools are built primarily around syncing entire files onto local devices or bringing workflows into web applications. Space lives at the file system layer, low enough that applications like Premiere, DaVinci, Blender, CAD tools, code editors, and AI agents and agentic applications can all work from the file system without a separate integration for every tool.

Most agentic tools today make users upload an entire file to a chatbot even when the task needs only one page, one frame, or one byte range. That is slow, expensive, and wasteful. Space gives teams and AI-native companies a filesystem their agents can navigate directly.

Space is currently in private beta, with roughly 100 users and teams onboarded, backed by an organic audience of more than 80,000 across platforms.

The Origin – Built from a company-wide problem

Space was founded by Matthew Ao, Arihant Bapna, and Jason Zhao after the same constraint followed them from individual work into operating a company. Zhao first encountered the problem after accumulating dozens of terabytes of footage across drives as he documented his life on YouTube over the last decade. At the trio’s previous company, it became an organization-wide bottleneck: the team moved terabytes of footage each month while scaling an aggressive organic growth strategy, losing hours to uploads and downloads, quality to compression, and entire workflows when someone left a drive at home. 

In November 2025, the founding team built the first Space prototype. Months later, working out of Founders Inc. in San Francisco while raising their pre-seed round, demand grew faster than they could keep up, so they went all in toward a single bold vision: an AI-native filesystem that gives every computer infinite space and ultimately, an infinite computer unconstrained by the storage and compute of the physical machine.

What’s next

Space is beginning with teams whose workflows already exceed the limits of local disks across the video, marketing, and AEC industries. These industries are also at the forefront of adopting agentic workflows, where humans and agents must work across the same large volumes of live, unstructured data.

From there, Space will expand into AI-native companies and the world’s most data-intensive workflows, including media and entertainment, AI training-data infrastructure, computer vision, enterprise data systems, and world-model pipelines.

The filesystem is Space’s starting point. The longer-term vision is what the team calls the Space Computer, or the infinite computer: a world where the physical machine becomes a window into effectively unlimited storage and compute.