In light of Earth Month, 2025, TELUS is launching two initiatives offering customers the opportunity to join them in reforestation efforts this year. Following two back-to-back record-breaking wildfire years in Canada, reforestation is particularly crucial to climate resilience. According to recent studies, replanted areas that have suffered from wildfires can experience regrowth up to 25% faster than areas that were not replanted.
Buy One, Plant One
From April 17 until May 15, for every new, or certified pre-owned Android device purchased by a new or returning customer, TELUS will plant a tree in a wildfire-affected region of Canada. Additionally, when trading in any preloved device, TELUS will plant a bonus tree. This promotion is eligible in select TELUS and Koodo stores, online or via customer service representatives.
TELUS Tree Totes:
On April 22, TELUS is launching limited-edition Tree Totes at TELUS stores nationwide. These 100% recycled cotton tote bags will be available for $3 CAD, and for every bag purchased, TELUS will plant a tree in wildfire-affected areas in Canada.
To date, TELUS has planted 19 million trees, covering an area equivalent to the size of Vancouver. We’ve also diverted 15 million devices from landfills, including 4 million mobile devices that were upcycled and recycled since 2010. These initiatives build on TELUS’ long-standing commitment to sustainability as a global leader in this space, investing in innovative technology and sustainable business practices to help address the impacts of climate change.
Synology partially drops support for third-party drives in their new NAS offerings
Posted in Commentary with tags Synology on April 17, 2025 by itnerdI’ve been planning on replacing my QNAP NAS with one from Synology for a few months now. And I also have been recommending them to clients for years now. But I am rethinking both of those based on this story from Tom’s Hardware:
Synology’s new Plus Series NAS systems, designed for small and medium enterprises and advanced home users, can no longer use non-Synology or non-certified hard drives and get the full feature set of their device. Instead, Synology customers will have to use the company’s self-branded hard drives. While you can still use non-supported drives for storage, Hardwareluxx [machine translated] reports that you’ll lose several critical functions, including estimated hard drive health reports, volume-wide deduplication, lifespan analyses, and automatic firmware updates. The company also restricts storage pools and provides limited or zero support for third-party drives.
For reference, precious few companies make hard drives, and Synology is not one of them. As such, a self-branded hard drive is merely a drive from a major vendor, like Seagate, Toshiba, or Western Digital, that gets a new sticker slapped on it alongside a potential custom firmware that serves as a sort of DRM, unlocking the correct functionality from the host device (in this case, a NAS).
The 2024 Synology models and older are not affected by this change. Still, those upgrading to or purchasing the latest Plus Series device, set to be released this year, will have to buy their drives directly from Synology or its certified suppliers to maximize their system. Because of this, you won’t be able to pick from the best hard drives if you get Synology’s latest Plus Series NAS Systems.
Is this about providing the best user experience? Or is this really about taking more money out of users pockets? I can argue this both ways as hard drives compatibility with NAS products can be really fiddly and troublesome at times. So going this route, this solves this problem as Synology has total control. Then there’s the fact that when it comes to issues with NAS products, consumers blame the NAS and not the hard drive company. By going this route, that problem is removed.
But at the same time I have to wonder if this is a way for Synology to line its pockets with cash. I say that because companies like QNAP aren’t going this route. So one has to wonder how much of a problem this really is. I’ve never had an issue with any NAS that I’ve built for myself or for a customer. But I am a small sample size relative to the broader market. Thus it will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Leave a comment »