Archive for US

SIM Cards Still Secure Despite Hack Says Gemalto

Posted in Commentary with tags , , , on February 23, 2015 by itnerd

Last week I brought you a story on UK and US intelligence types hacking into a company called Gemalto who makes among other things, SIM cards for mobile phone carriers, and gaining the ability to eavesdrop on millions of smartphone users because of the hack. Today, Gemalto came out with a statement that basically says that the SIM cards that they produce are still secure despite this hack:

Gemalto, the world leader in digital security, is devoting the necessary resources to investigate and understand the scope of such sophisticated techniques. Initial conclusions already indicate that Gemalto SIM products (as well as banking cards, passports and other products and platforms) are secure and the Company doesn’t expect to endure a significant financial prejudice.

The company does plan to hold a press conference to provide more details on this in Paris at 10:30 am on the 25th of February. We’ll see at that point how the company explains the fact that their SIM cards are secure despite this hack. Personally, I am dubious. But I’m willing to let them lay out their evidence to back up their case.

Hackers Hit Health Insurer…. “Tens Of Millions” Of Records Stolen…. China Possibly Involved

Posted in Commentary with tags , , on February 6, 2015 by itnerd

If you’get your health insurance from Anthem who is one of the largest health insurers in the US, then you likely have something to worry about. According to The Wall Street Journal, they got hit by hackers on an epic scale:

Investigators are still determining the extent of the incursion, which was discovered last week, and Anthem said it is likely that “tens of millions” of records were stolen. The health insurer said the breach exposed names, birthdays, addresses and Social Security numbers but doesn’t appear to involve medical information or financial details such as credit-card or bank-account numbers, nor are there signs the data are being sold on the black market.

Anthem, which offers Blue Cross Blue Shield plans in California, New York and other states, said it doesn’t know precisely how many people may be affected. So far, it appears that the attack detected last week is the only breach of Anthem’s systems, and it isn’t yet clear how the hackers were able to obtain the identification information needed to access the database said Thomas Miller, the insurer’s chief information officer.

That’s just delightful. Affected customers will be contacted by Anthem. But what’s got my attention is this Bloomberg story that points the finger at China:

Technical details of the attack include “fingerprints” of a nation-state, according to two people familiar with the investigation, who said China is the early suspect.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is leading the investigation, according to Anthem, which has hired FireEye Inc., a Milpitas, California-based security company, to assist.

China has said in the past that it doesn’t conduct espionage through hacking. The Chinese embassy in Washington didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

I personally would like to see proof of that as it’s really easy to point a finger at someone and say “they did it.” But let’s say that China is behind this. I’d like to know what the US government is doing to protect its citizens from state sponsored hacks like this? Assuming that they are doing anything at all of course.

Central Command Twitter Account Gets Pwned By Hackers Sympathetic To ISIS

Posted in Commentary with tags , on January 12, 2015 by itnerd

U.S. Central Command is the branch of the U.S. Military that runs operations in Middle East, North Africa, and Central Asia, most notably Afghanistan and Iraq. Seeing as the US has been in that area for an extended period of time, I’m pretty sure that that they’ve made a few enemies. So perhaps one of them decided to try and exact some revenge by hacking or “Pwning” the Twitter account of Central Command. Here’s what CNBC had to say:

The Twitter account for U.S. Central Command was hacked on Monday, with pro-ISIS messages plastering the account’s profile. 

The first message was posted at 12:29 p.m. ET, with the words “AMERICAN SOLDIERS, WE ARE COMING, WATCH YOUR BACK. ISIS.” and the hashtag “#CyberCaliphate.” 

The profile’s image was replaced with a photo that includes the text “i love you isis.” Just before 1 p.m. ET profile and banner images were reverted to their default.

Well that’s embarrassing. The FBI is investigating. But all this is is embarrassing. It’s not as if the people behind this pulled a Sony Pictures type of hack. So really, other than some embarrassing moments, there’s really nothing to see here. Though I would suggest that Central Command change the password of their social medial accounts before they get “Pwned” again.

Hey IT Nerd! Do US Charges Against Chinese Hackers Mean Anything?

Posted in Commentary with tags , , on May 20, 2014 by itnerd

Another question from a reader popped into my inbox today:

Good afternoon. Yesterday, the US Government laid charges against a number of Chinese officials for cybercrimes against six US companies. My question is, does that really matter as I don’t see China handing these people over to stand trial?

Thanks for the question. Before I answer your question, let me do a quick recap. Yesterday the US Department of Justice laid charges against five people who they accused of hacking six US companies and then turning over whatever they electronically stole to Chinese based companies. In effect, these five people are accused of cyber espionage for commercial gain. Now, I’m all for going after those who hack other people or companies and I am all for them being punished to the fullest extent of the law. However, that’s likely not going to happen in this case. There’s zero chance that China will hand over these people. Which means they will never face justice. Plus this is likely to increase tensions between the US and China. Thus other than give the appearance that the US is going after cybercrime, I fail to see the point of this exercise. Perhaps there’s something going on behind the scenes that is connected to this that will clarify things, assuming we find out about it. But as it stands now, the logic of laying these charges escapes me.

Perhaps some of the readers of this blog has some further insight on this? If so, please leave a comment and share your wisdom.