A DHS NTAS Bulletin is out that everyone should read given the escalated situation between the US and Iran:
The ongoing Iran conflict is causing a heightened threat environment in the United States. Low-level cyber attacks against US networks by pro-Iranian hacktivists are likely, and cyber actors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against US networks. Iran also has a long-standing commitment to target US Government officials it views as responsible for the death of an Iranian military commander killed in January 2020. The likelihood of violent extremists in the Homeland independently mobilizing to violence in response to the conflict would likely increase if Iranian leadership issued a religious ruling calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the Homeland. Multiple recent Homeland terrorist attacks have been motivated by anti-Semitic or anti-Israel sentiment, and the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict could contribute to US-based individuals plotting additional attacks.
Tom Pace, former Head of Cyber for the Department of Energy (DoE) and current CEO of NetRise, provides his thoughts on what CISOs in the US are doing to prepare for potential retaliatory cyberattacks by Iran:
CISOs are moving quickly to prepare for potential Iranian retaliation in cyberspace by tightening access controls, validating backups, and watching for TTPs tied to groups like APT33 and APT34, which are tied to Iran. Coordination with ISACs and federal partners is essential to stay current on threat intelligence and emerging attack patterns.
This moment reinforces the urgency of visibility to know what code is running where, what it’s connected to, and whether it’s vulnerable or end-of-life. Software supply chain security is no longer an abstract concept. It’s a frontline defense against adversaries who exploit opaque systems. CISOs are asking: if Iranian actors drop a custom wiper tomorrow, would we know which systems could execute it?
Iran is going to be targeting low-hanging fruit vulnerabilities that they know they can exploit, or target outdated SOHO routers and infrastructure for the purposes of creating low to moderate scale botnets.
China tends to have very explicit goals and outcomes that they are pursuing, which tend to center around intelligence gathering and positioning. Iran may be looking to cause more destruction, given the attacks on their country. These targets may be small and incapable of defending themselves and hold little to no strategic value, but Iran needs to have a response that provides the illusion that they are a competent actor on the world stage.
This threat while being directed at the US may spill over to countries that are aligned with the US. Thus if you’re responsible for defending your organization from cyberattacks, consider this a heads up to redouble your efforts regardless of where you are.
DHS bans DeepSeek AI products across federal civilian agencies
Posted in Commentary with tags DHS on October 20, 2026 by itnerdThe Department of Homeland Security has ordered federal civilian agencies to remove Chinese AI company DeepSeek’s products from government IT systems and prohibit future purchases, according to a Federal Register notice published October 20.
The order also covers DeepSeek affiliates and third-party products or services developed using DeepSeek technology. DHS cited concerns that sensitive government information could be transferred to China, along with potential malware, security vulnerabilities and data collection risks.
Agencies must remove affected products or seek an exception. DHS also recommends enhanced network monitoring, logging and controls to detect potential data exfiltration. The order does not apply to private businesses or consumers.
Seemant Sehgal, Founder & CEO, BreachLock said this:
“The order prompts the harder internal question for private sector security leaders, which is whether the data an employee pasted into DeepSeek last month to summarize a document is now part of someone else’s training set. Shadow AI usage has been running ahead of governance in most enterprises for at least the past year. The specific risk the DHS order names, which is that queries and attached data pass through infrastructure outside allied jurisdictions, applies to any employee using any foreign AI service that offers free access.
“The affiliates and third-party products clause in the order is where this gets harder, because an employee does not need to use DeepSeek directly to send data to it. A commercial product built on DeepSeek technology would route the same queries through the same infrastructure without the user ever knowing which model was handling the request.”
Organizations need to make sure that DeepSeek or its variants doesn’t make it into your environment. That is likely to be very, very bad.
Leave a comment »