ESET researchers have identified new MuddyWater activity primarily targeting organizations in Israel, with one confirmed target in Egypt. The victims in Israel were in the technology, engineering, manufacturing, local government, and educational sectors. MuddyWater, also referred to as Mango Sandstorm or TA450, is an Iran-aligned cyberespionage group known for its persistent targeting of government and critical infrastructure sectors, often leveraging custom malware and publicly available tools, and has links to the Ministry of Intelligence and National Security of Iran. In this campaign, the attackers deployed a set of previously undocumented, custom tools with the objective of improving defense evasion and persistence. New backdoor MuddyViper enables the attackers to collect system information, execute files and shell commands, transfer files, and exfiltrate Windows login credentials and browser data. The campaign leverages additional credential stealers. Among these tools is Fooder, a custom loader that masquerades as the classic Snake game.
In this campaign, initial access is typically achieved through spearphishing emails, often containing PDF attachments that link to installers for remote monitoring and management (RMM) software hosted on free file-sharing platforms such as OneHub, Egnyte, or Mega. These links lead to the download of tools including Atera, Level, PDQ, and SimpleHelp. Among the tools deployed by MuddyWater operators is also the VAX One backdoor, named after the legitimate software which it impersonates: Veeam, AnyDesk, Xerox, and the OneDrive updater service.
The group’s continued reliance on this familiar playbook makes its activity relatively easy to detect and block. However, in this case, the group also used more advanced techniques to deploy MuddyViper, a new backdoor, by using a loader (Fooder) that reflectively loads MuddyViper into memory and executes it. Several versions of Fooder masquerade as the classic Snake game, hence the designation, MuddyViper. Another notable characteristic of Fooder is its frequent use of a custom delay function that implements the core logic of the Snake game, combined with “Sleep” API calls. These features are intended to delay execution in an attempt to hide malicious behavior from automated analysis systems. Additionally, MuddyWater developers adopted CNG, the next-generation Windows cryptographic API, which is unique for Iran-aligned groups and somewhat atypical across the broader threat landscape. During this campaign, the operators deliberately avoided hands-on-keyboard interactive sessions, which is a historically noisy technique often characterized by mistyped commands. Thus, while some components remain noisy and easily detected, as is typical for MuddyWater, overall this campaign shows signs of technical evolution – increased precision, strategic targeting, and a more advanced toolset.
The post-compromise toolset also includes multiple credential stealers: CE-Notes, which targets Chromium-based browsers; LP-Notes, which stages and verifies stolen credentials; and Blub, which steals login data from Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Opera browsers.
MuddyWater was first introduced to the public in 2017 by Unit 42, whose description of the group’s activity is consistent with ESET’s profiling – a focus on cyberespionage, the use of malicious documents as attachments designed to prompt users to enable macros and bypass security controls, and primarily targeting entities located in the Middle East.
Notable past activities include Operation Quicksand (2020), a cyberespionage campaign targeting Israeli government entities and telecommunications organizations, which exemplifies the group’s evolution from basic phishing tactics to more advanced, multistage operations; and a campaign targeting political groups and organizations in Türkiye, demonstrating the group’s geopolitical focus, its ability to adapt social engineering tactics to local contexts, and reliance on modular malware and flexible C&C infrastructure.
ESET has documented multiple campaigns attributed to MuddyWater that highlight the group’s evolving toolset and shifting operational focus. In March and April 2023, MuddyWater targeted an unidentified victim in Saudi Arabia, and the group conducted a campaign in January and February 2025 that was notable for its operational overlap with Lyceum (an OilRig subgroup). This cooperation suggests that MuddyWater may be acting as an initial access broker for other Iran-aligned groups.
For a more detailed analysis of the latest MuddyWater campaign, check out the latest ESET Research blogpost “MuddyWater: Snakes by the riverbank” on WeLiveSecurity.com.
ESET Research: One of Russia’s most notorious groups, Sednit, resurges with spyware in Ukraine
Posted in Commentary with tags ESET on March 10, 2026 by itnerdESET researchers recently traced the reactivation of Sednit through their modern toolkit, which is centered on two paired implants, BeardShell and Covenant, each using a different cloud provider for resilience. This dual‑implant approach enabled long‑term surveillance of Ukrainian military personnel and has been in use since April 2024. In 2016, the US Department of Justice linked the Sednit group to Unit 26165 of the GRU, a Russian Federation intelligence agency within the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Russian military.
ESET’s account of modern Sednit activities begins with SlimAgent, an espionage implant discovered on a Ukrainian governmental machine by CERT-UA in April 2024. SlimAgent is a simple yet efficient spying tool capable of logging keystrokes, capturing screenshots, and collecting clipboard data. Within its telemetry ESET identified previously unknown samples with code similar to SlimAgent, which were deployed as early as 2018 – six years before the Ukrainian case – against governmental entities in two European countries. Thus, SlimAgent appears to be an evolution of the Xagent keylogger module, which has been deployed as a standalone component since at least 2018. Xagent is a custom toolset used exclusively by the Sednit group for more than six years.
SlimAgent was not the only implant found on the Ukrainian machine in 2024; BeardShell – a much more recent addition to Sednit’s custom arsenal – was deployed there as well. BeardShell is a sophisticated implant capable of executing PowerShell commands within a .NET runtime environment, while leveraging the legitimate cloud storage service Icedrive as its Command & Control channel. The shared use of a rare obfuscation technique, combined with its co-location with SlimAgent, leads ESET to assess with high confidence that BeardShell is part of Sednit’s custom arsenal.
Since the initial 2024 case, Sednit continued deploying BeardShell through 2025 and into 2026, primarily in long-term espionage operations targeting Ukrainian military personnel. To maintain persistent access to these high-value targets, Sednit systematically deploys another implant alongside BeardShell: Covenant, the final component of its modern arsenal. Covenant is an open-source .NET post exploitation framework and provides over 90 built-in tasks, supporting capabilities such as data exfiltration, target monitoring, and network pivoting.
Since 2023, Sednit developers have made a number of modifications and experiments with Covenant to establish it as their primary espionage implant, keeping BeardShell mainly as a fallback in case Covenant encounters operational issues, such as the takedown of its cloud-based infrastructure. Sednit has successfully relied on Covenant for several years, particularly against selected targets in Ukraine.
For instance, in 2025, our analysis of Sednit-controlled Covenant cloud drives revealed machines that had been monitored for more than six months. In January 2026, Sednit also deployed Covenant in a series of spearphishing campaigns exploiting the CVE 2026 21509 vulnerability, as reported by CERT UA.
The sophistication of BeardShell and the extensive modifications made to Covenant demonstrate that Sednit’s developers remain fully capable of producing advanced custom implants. Furthermore, the shared code and techniques linking these tools to their 2010-era predecessors strongly suggest continuity within the development team.
For a more detailed analysis of Sednit’s latest arsenal, check out the latest ESET Research blogpost ” Sednit reloaded: Back in the trenches ” on WeLiveSecurity.com.
Leave a comment »