Something really weird happened today to Canadian tech company Route1 whom I have written about previously. At 8AM today, this press release from CEO Tony Busseri appeared on their website and on the wires. I have reprinted it below in it’s entirety:
Dear MobiKEY Users,
Since joining Route1, I have focused our team’s efforts on executing our business plan. As a result, Route1 is on a path of accelerated growth and is working with corner stone accounts such as the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. In addition, as I mentioned in the most recent earnings release, we are building a significant base of potential business and developing new applications that we believe will add to profitability in the future.
Unfortunately, in the modern age of the Internet, online publications allow for the rapid and broad dissemination of information on companies whether the information is factual or misleading. Last week, I was quoted in an AOL Defense article online, where Route1’s technology was explained. In light of the recent activity and concerns, I believe it is important to set the record straight about Route1 regarding our technology and exactly how our security and identity management products and services provide the highest level of remote access security on the market today.
What has been misrepresented goes to the heart of our technology. Route1’s technology is patented (U.S. Patents 7,739,726 and 7,814,216) and is proven to “let federal workers telecommute securely using ordinary computers and mobile devices, not just specially lobotomized ones”. A key part of a Route1 delivered secure remote access session is that the enterprise’s data is not allowed to exit the enterprise’s network, and thus advance beyond the confines of the enterprise’s firewall(s) which are built to protect the data. We call that ‘protecting the fortress’.
Whether or not a teleworker is using a personal device or an enterprise computer makes absolutely no difference to us. With Route1’s solution, what is essentially happening is the host computer is sending encrypted screen shots to the mobile device; be it laptop, tablet, or other similar devices, and the mobile device or guest computer keystrokes and mouse movements are being sent encrypted back to the host computer to be effected on the host computer. As a direct result of Route1’s solution architecture, data on the mobile device can NOT be mixed with the enterprise’s data.
The final result being that it is impossible for a hacker to piggy-back a Route1 connection or penetrate an enterprise’s firewall during a Route1 data session. The data is completely secure.
That is the Route1 difference. We always put security first by protecting the fortress.
Sincerely,
Tony Busseri
Now it made we wonder what article he was talking about. A quick Google search found this article. It talks about Route1 and their technology and quotes Busseri. It does have this quote that got my attention:
Ultimately, though, as is often the case in computing and security more generally, the biggest problem is not the technology but the people using it. When you read stories that “someone had left their damn laptop on the train, sorry, that’s not a shortcoming of the system, that’s a shortcoming of the person,” Wilsker said. “These people are not adequately trained,” he went on. “The fear of God has to be put into people.”
That’s true. The weak point when it comes to security is the user because some users do dumb things. But that’s a given. There is also a note at the bottom of the article that indicates that the article was revised to clarify the security features of the Route1 software.
Although there is a bit of a cynical tone to the article, there’s nothing here that should have caused this to happen to the stock price:
That’s one hell of a dive. Now the stock has floated as low as $0.03 a share in late 2008 and at the moment it appears to be heading back there again. But the question is, why the dive? Is it this article followed by the press release from today which has spooked investors? Is it something else such as the overall turmoil in the markets? Perhaps investors are getting out as they were disappointed with Route1’s recent results? I don’t know for sure. I’m a IT nerd, not a stock analyst. Perhaps someone who does watch stocks for a living can chime in and comment on what happened. However I don’t need a economics degree to see that this company is in deep trouble at the moment. At this point, I don’t know what can save them. And that’s too bad for them as they seemed to have a bright future.

Hey IT Nerd! Why Haven’t You Written About Route1 Lately?
Posted in Commentary with tags Route1 on February 15, 2013 by itnerdFor those of you who are recent readers to this blog, Route1 is a company based in Toronto Canada that makes digital security and identity management products and has a customer list that includes the Department of Homeland Security and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Their flagship product is the MobiKEY which lets you securely access your PC from any where. I even had one for a while when I was still making the transition form working for someone else to working for myself and I loved using it.
So, back to your question. I have a soft spot for Canadian companies and I’ve written about Route1 extensively in the past. But the reason why I haven’t written about Route1 lately is largely because they haven’t done anything of note. For what it’s worth, I’ve said this in the past about the company:
My feeling is that it needs to hit a home run of some sort to really put it on a course of success. You would think that given the client list that it has, that we shouldn’t be talking about this and we’d be saying that it is the next tech giant from Canada. Clearly that isn’t the case.
I still believe that they are a “home run” away from success. But the closest thing to big news is a press release that notes a $200,000 judgement in a defamation lawsuit brought against a user of the investor board Stockhouse.com (though from recent checks of that board, the user in question who goes by the pseudonym of “simonquinn” hasn’t been silenced which makes me wonder how effective this judgement was). Combined with their stock being at $0.04 as I type this, it doesn’t give me a reason to write about this company.
Now perhaps I’m looking at this wrong and that success is just around the corner. Their latest version of the MobiKEY works on the Mac (albeit as a client to allow you to access your PC at work remotely), and that will help to broaden their appeal to more users. Not to mention the company has been somewhat transparent about their sales pipeline which will help to keep the the noise down and allow them to focus on what they need to do. But having said all of that, all I know is the longer they go without that home run, the less likely they’ll be part of my Google Alerts which in turn means that I won’t be writing about them. That’s a shame as I really think their technology is top shelf and there’s a need for it. But great technology alone doesn’t make you a successful company by default. You have to be able to hit the home run. Harsh, but true.
If they put one in the seats, you can bet that I’ll be writing about it here. If they don’t, you now know why I won’t be writing about them.
Leave a comment »