For those who don’t know, John Gruber has been writing and covering the Apple space for a couple of decades now. He’s even been on stage interviewing top Apple execs. So when he says something about Apple, you should pay attention.
With that in mind, Gruber has posted this piece on his site and it should get the attention of people within Apple. In short, he pretty much takes Apple to the woodshed over Apple Intelligence:
In the two decades I’ve been in this racket, I’ve never been angrier at myself for missing a story than I am about Apple’s announcement on Friday that the “more personalized Siri” features of Apple Intelligence, scheduled to appear between now and WWDC, would be delayed until “the coming year”.
I should have my head examined.
This announcement dropped as a surprise, and certainly took me by surprise to some extent, but it was all there from the start. I should have been pointing out red flags starting back at WWDC last year, and I am embarrassed and sorry that I didn’t see what should have been very clear to me from the start.
And:
What Apple showed regarding the upcoming “personalized Siri” at WWDC was not a demo. It was a concept video. Concept videos are bullshit, and a sign of a company in disarray, if not crisis.
He’s clearly not pulling any punches here. And I’ve just posted a couple of snippets of what he said. If you really want to get the full flavor of his epic takedown of Apple, I encourage you to read the whole piece. But let me get to the TL:DR: He’s basically said that nobody should have believed the Apple Intelligence demo at WWDC 2024 because Apple was lying. And now they’re scrambling to somehow catch up when they were already behind the 8-ball so to speak.
And the thing is he’s right as far as I am concerned. Just like I said here. And hopefully this is the wake up call that Apple needs to get its act together. Because if not, Apple’s credibility at the very least is screwed. And at worst, the company may be screwed as well.
Are you listening Tim Cook?
CISA Puts Out Advisory On Medusa Ransomware
Posted in Commentary with tags CISA on March 13, 2025 by itnerdYesterday, CISA released a joint advisory on the Medusa Ransomware that provided tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), indicators of compromise (IOCs), and detection methods associated with the ransomware group. As of February 2025, Medusa has impacted over 300 victims across critical infrastructure sectors, including medical, education, law, insurance, technology, and manufacturing.
You can read the advisory here.
James Winebrenner, CEO at Elisity had this to say:
“The CISA recent advisory on Medusa ransomware really reflects how threat actors are getting smarter and adapting. What particularly concerns me is Medusa’s exploitation of legitimate remote management tools like AnyDesk, ConnectWise, and Splashtop, which are the tools many OT environments rely on for maintenance and support.
Medusa’s attack pattern through the lens of IEC 62443 is a classic example of why proper zone boundary protection (CR 5.2) and network segmentation (CR 5.1) are foundational to industrial control system security. The attackers first perform reconnaissance and then leverage legitimate tools for lateral movement before payload deployment, a pattern that traditional detection methods struggle to identify.
Organizations should implement three technical controls aligned with IEC 62443:
The triple extortion scheme mentioned in the advisory indicates that Medusa actors understand the unique pressures facing critical infrastructure operators. Organizations must treat ransomware as a business risk requiring defense-in-depth strategies across people, process, and technology controls.
With Medusa attacks up 42% according to Symantec, OT security teams should reassess their segmentation strategies and ensure alignment with IEC 62443 standards.”
What this advisory highlights is the fact that this is a today problem and every organization needs to treat it as such. Because an advisory like this would not exist if this ransomware were not a clear and present danger.
Leave a comment »