Archive for October 7, 2026

AI order-to-cash platform Stuut raises $52.5M Series B after unlocking 40% more cash for enterprises

Posted in Commentary with tags on October 7, 2026 by itnerd

Businesses worldwide have $16 trillion locked up in unpaid receivables. Stuut, the AI platform that runs order-to-cash for the some of the world’s leading enterprises, is going after it. 

In a world where all finance software often looks and behaves the same, Stuut offers customers the ability to automate the vast majority of their work. It runs the entire order-to-cash process, moving dollars through collections, cash application, payments, disputes, and deductions. Stuut’s customers are freeing up to 40% more cash flow, with a 47% reduction in DSO. 

Now, just ten months after its Series A and amid overwhelming demand, the company is announcing a $52.5 million Series B led by Insight Partners, with participation from Andreessen Horowitz, M12, Microsoft’s Venture Fund, and Activant, bringing its total funding to $93 million.

The problem Stuut is solving

Most customers want to pay. But a missing PO, bad order data, or an invoice sent to the wrong person triggers weeks of emails, portal work, and internal chasing. By the time an invoice is overdue, one small error can drag sales, finance, operations, and multiple systems into the mess. At enterprise scale, getting paid turns into millions of tiny investigations consuming thousands of hours. 

The cost can be enormous: broken order-to-cash processes can wipe out as much as 5% of a company’s revenue, as much as $1 trillion a year across the Fortune 500 alone. 

How Stuut works 

A missing PO can snowball into a rejected invoice, then a portal submission, then a short-pay or deduction. Stuut follows that entire chain across thousands of invoices at once, reaching customers worldwide via SMS, email, and call, logging into AP portals, reconciling cash, and taking the next action without losing context.

Every interaction makes Stuut harder to replace. It builds a living memory of each customer: how they pay, which portals they use, what breaks and how it gets fixed. That memory compounds until Stuut disappears into the background. The work keeps moving without finance teams having to manage it. When they want visibility, they can ask what happened, why it happened and exactly what Stuut did to resolve it.

This is already happening at scale. 81.7% of outbound collections activity runs without human involvement, while 95% of incoming payments are matched automatically. Stuut now extends into credit and order management, catching issues upstream before they turn into payment problems.

Importantly, enterprises don’t have to change how they work. Stuut instantly integrates into any ERP, bank account, CRM, and payment system, going live in days. It’s configured to each company’s existing processes and controls, with every action auditable and any behavior change requiring approval.

Stuut is also partnering with leading firms across working capital to give enterprises a faster way to buy, deploy and scale the platform, including Fiserv, EY, Altamont, HIG, and more. 

Traction 

Today, Stuut is used by over 150 customers, including Fortune 50 and Fortune 500 companies. Its customer base has grown 5x since last year and more than $3 billion has moved through the platform, with customers aggressively pulling Stuut across more of the order-to-cash lifecycle. 

Some of the world’s largest companies are seeing similar results. Bishop Lifting has rolled Stuut across 45 branches for collections, disputes and cash application, cutting overdue receivables by 35%, unlocking $3 million in working capital and increasing accounts managed per employee by 50%. Honeywell runs Stuut on top of legacy SAP to reach the long tail of customer accounts and is expanding the platform into quote-to-cash. At ZoomInfo, Stuut has collected $21.2 million and reduced time to first touch by more than 90%.

Why this matters now

The work of getting paid is getting harder to do. Finance teams are handling more customers, more transactions and more systems, while more than 300,000 accountants have left the profession since 2019. And for all the software built around order-to-cash, most of the actual work still falls to people. US businesses are carrying $7.2 trillion in trade receivables and every additional day of DSO leaves roughly $150 billion tied up. DSO is closely watched by boards and, at some companies, tied directly to CFO compensation. Now that software can actually execute the work, rather than just organize it, order-to-cash is becoming one of the highest-value deployments of AI.

Looking ahead

With the company growing over 90% quarter over quarter, Stuut will use this funding to meet overwhelming customer demand and expand deeper into the financial infrastructure around every transaction, from credit and lending to the movement of funds. The long-term ambition is much bigger: make selling radically easier for some of the world’s largest enterprises. Stuut wants to carry every transaction from the moment a company decides to sell something, through every decision, document and payment in between, until the cash is in the bank.

93% of Employers Say Human-Centered Skills Are More Important as AI Reshapes Cybersecurity

Posted in Commentary with tags on October 7, 2026 by itnerd

New research out today from Rogers Cybersecure Catalyst at Toronto Metropolitan University (“the Catalyst”), funded by the Future Skills Centre through the Government of Canada’s Future Skills Program, examines how AI is changing the work traditionally done by early-career cybersecurity professionals and what that could mean for how they build foundational skills and experience.

The report, Preserving Foundational Skills in AI-Enabled Early-Career Cybersecurity Work, explores how the growing use of AI in cybersecurity could affect entry-level roles, learning opportunities, and the pathways through which new professionals develop their expertise.

The “entry-level paradox”

Employers described a shift in traditional Level 1 cybersecurity work, with tasks such as alert triage, query writing, and incident investigation increasingly automated or AI-assisted. As a result, early-career professionals are taking on more complex investigations, exercising greater judgment, and navigating business and operational context earlier in their careers. Some employers are describing this as “Level 1.5” roles. This shift is creating an “entry-level paradox” where employers want job-ready cybersecurity talent, while AI is reshaping the routine tasks through which newcomers have traditionally become job-ready.

Several employers raised concerns about a potential “loss of practice,” as AI reduces opportunities to independently perform the tasks that build technical knowledge, problem-solving skills, and professional judgment. At the same time, the research points to a broader shift in the capabilities employers value. While 64% of consultation responses identified foundational technical and IT knowledge as important, 93% of employers identified human-centred capabilities (commonly referred to as “soft skills”) as increasingly important, including communication skills (36%), stakeholder management (27%) and critical thinking (18%).

AI literacy is not a stand-alone skill. Professionals need to know how to use AI appropriately in the context of their specific tasks. And they need to have these role-specific technical AI skills in combination with communications skills, collaborative abilities, and an ability to think critically about problems.

Rethinking how cybersecurity talent is assessed and developed

These changing expectations also have implications for how cybersecurity professionals are assessed and hired. Nearly 1 in 3 employers raised concerns about assessment and hiring practices as candidates increasingly use AI during technical assessments, certifications, and interviews. Employers questioned whether traditional credentials and assessments provide enough evidence of workplace readiness, and many expressed growing interest in more applied ways of demonstrating readiness, including:

Proof of work (concrete evidence of a candidate’s applied skills and capabilities, like technical portfolios)
Simulations (practical scenarios that assess how candidates apply their skills in realistic situations)
Scenario-based assessments (assessing how candidates approach realistic challenges with and without AI)
Participants also highlighted governance, risk, and practical risk decision-making as increasingly important. Early-career professionals may need to understand not only how to identify technical risks but also how to assess, communicate, and manage those risks within a broader business context.

The research points to a need for employers, educators, and training providers to rethink what “job-ready” means, how job readiness is assessed, and how early-career professionals can build and demonstrate the capabilities needed to succeed as AI changes traditional pathways into cybersecurity. This includes creating more opportunities for hands-on learning and operational experience, using applied assessments that test reasoning and judgment with and without AI, and preparing professionals to validate AI outputs, understand risk, and apply human judgment.

The Catalyst tested these approaches through two pilot training iterations involving 55 early-career cybersecurity professionals, using hands-on simulations, a tabletop exercise, and an AI literacy lab to practice these skills in realistic scenarios.

Ultimately, the research suggests that AI is not eliminating early-career cybersecurity roles but reshaping the work, pathways, and opportunities through which the next generation of cybersecurity professionals develops experience. As those pathways evolve, employers and educators will need to ensure that AI-driven efficiency is matched by meaningful opportunities to learn, practice, and demonstrate the skills cybersecurity work still depends on.

The full report available here

SIOS Technology Expands Leadership Team to Support Global Growth and Rising Demand for Application Resilience

Posted in Commentary with tags on October 7, 2026 by itnerd

SIOS Technology Corp. today announced the expansion of its leadership team with the appointment of Charlie Mantione as Head of Sales, Americas and the promotion of Natalia Casey, Director of Marketing, to lead global marketing. The appointments reflect the company’s continued growth and increasing demand for solutions that help organizations ensure application uptime, operational resilience, and business continuity across cloud, hybrid, and on-premises environments. Both leaders will report directly to Masahiro Arai, Chief Operating Officer of SIOS Technology Corp.

As Head of Sales, Americas, Charlie will lead SIOS Technology’s global sales organization and oversee the company’s sales strategy, customer engagement, channel development and revenue growth initiatives. He brings more than 25 years of experience in enterprise technology, communications, managed services, and service provider markets. Throughout his career, Mr. Mantione has held senior sales, go-to-market, and services leadership positions at organizations including NCR, Cushman & Wakefield, Avaya, Dimension Data, and AT&T, where he built high-performing teams, expanded market presence, and drove business growth.

Casey has been promoted to lead SIOS Technology’s global marketing organization. Previously, she has played a key role in strengthening the company’s brand, driving demand generation programs, expanding partner marketing initiatives, and increasing awareness of SIOS solutions worldwide. In her new role, Casey will oversee global marketing strategy, corporate communications, digital marketing, partner marketing, and demand generation efforts.

SIOS Technology provides high availability and disaster recovery solutions that ensure continuous operation of critical applications across physical, virtual, cloud, and hybrid environments. The company’s software helps organizations minimize downtime, protect business-critical data, and simplify the management of complex IT infrastructures.

No, You Should Not Turn Apple Intelligence Off Using A Third Party Tool

Posted in Commentary with tags on October 7, 2026 by itnerd

Over the last 24 hours I’ve been asked if a new tool that has appeared can be used to kill Apple Intelligence. So seeing as I have got a lot of interest in this, I will answer this question. First the tool. Indie developer Om Lahore published a project called RemoveMacAI on GitHub late last week, which promises to “turn off Apple Intelligence on macOS 27 and remove its downloaded models.” And his tool apparently uses the company’s asset service to remove downloaded models and prevent macOS from downloading them again.

Now this sounds good. But consider this. Apple Intelligence is so buried in MacOS that I really doubt that this doesn’t come with any side effects. Thus even though this tool can save 14GB roughly based on my own testing with virtual machines, I would skip it. Instead, there is this tutorial that describes how to turn off Apple Intelligence for all Apple Devices.

Having said that, Apple really needs a way to kill Apple Intelligence dead. I say that because I have clients who are thinking twice about buying new Apple hardware that only supports macOS 27 or iOS 27, or any OS that ends in 27 as they don’t want to have to deal with this. So if Apple doesn’t want their hardware sales to nosedive, they may have no other option than to support the official removal of Apple Intelligence sooner rather than later.

Trump Mobile Has Been Pwned…. Shocked…. Not….

Posted in Commentary with tags on October 7, 2026 by itnerd

Honestly, I am not shocked by this as this was coming for ages. Which was that Trump Mobile has been pwned. And the details are well, predictable:

A Trump Mobile data leak has exposed the personal information of almost 4,000 people, including the cybersecurity chief responsible for protecting the Trump family business.

A dark web forum post revealed that a new criminal cyber group calling itself BYOD published data belonging to 3,615 Trump Mobile users on its leak site last week.

The exposed information reportedly included names, email addresses, phone numbers, home addresses and order details.

After examining the breached samples, the Cybernews research team confirmed that they appeared to be legitimate and were not tied to any previous breaches.

Among those exposed is Eric Brunnett, vice president and chief information officer of the Trump Organization, the entity which handles the family’s business affairs.

Brunnett’s LinkedIn profile says he oversees “all information technology and information security for all aspects” of the organization.

Last year, Brunnett told Hospitality Upgrade – in an interview that hailed him a “Technology Rockstar” – that there were an “unimaginable number of bad actors trying to infiltrate our network every day.”

“We have to maintain a security posture that doesn’t allow breaches of any kind,” he added.

Well, I guess this Brunnett guy is going to be looking for a new job. Here’s why:

In its initial message announcing the breach, BYOD said they informed Trump Mobile of the breach but were told that the mobile carrier had “no team to handle this” and that “anyone who hacks them is a terrorist.”

“Well unfortunately for them, all 3615 customers and their PII, alongside telecom details are now up for grabs,” BYOD added.

It has been reported that BYOD gained initial access by infecting an employee at Liberty Mobile, a Florida-based mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) that powers Trump Mobile, with a remote access trojan.

The hackers claim they then pivoted to exposed Trump Mobile subdomains and exfiltrated the customer data. BYOD also claims it retains “live access” to a Trump Mobile dashboard.

Honestly, it’s bad enough when you get pwned through no fault of your own. But when you from the looks of it have pretty sub-standard security to keep the bad guys out, you pretty much deserve to be pwned. Now this follows the fact that this same organization was pwned in May where you would think that this organization would have learned their lesson. But clearly not. In any case, if you tried to get this phone, I would check to see if you’ve been pwned. Because you have likely been pwned.