A reader surfaced a Bloomberg report to me that outlines the following:
Elon Musk plans to eliminate about 3,700 jobs at Twitter Inc., or half of the social media company’s workforce, in a bid to drive down costs following his $44 billion acquisition, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
Twitter’s new owner aims to inform affected staffers Friday, said the people, who requested anonymity discussing non-public plans. Musk also intends to reverse the company’s existing work-from-anywhere policy, asking remaining employees to report to offices — though some exceptions could be made, the people said.
Musk and a team of advisers have been weighing a range of scenarios for job cuts and other policy changes at San Francisco-based Twitter, the people said, adding that the terms of the headcount reduction could still change. In one scenario being considered, laid off workers will be offered 60 days’ worth of severance pay, two of the people said.
After the layoffs were sorted, Twitter Chief Accounting Officer Robert Kaiden left the company, becoming one of the last pre-Musk C-suite executives to depart, according to people familiar with the matter.
A spokesperson for Twitter didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Musk is really under the gun to find a way to get Twitter to a point that it will not only make money, but he doesn’t look like someone who talks the talk but can’t walk the walk. Even though he has a history of not being able to walk the walk. And this is the sort of stuff that will send those who survive this coin flip shot at keeping their jobs at Twitter to the exit door faster than Barry Allen trying to save the day. Because as the person who brought this to my attention said, it’s no fun working for a dictator. I would agree with that, but I would also add that it’s no fun working for a dictator who is desperate and don’t have a clue.
Those who work for Twitter, those who use Twitter, and most importantly, those who were dumb enough to lend Musk money to buy Twitter should brace for impact as this is not going to end well for anyone.
EdTech Cyber Expert Comments On Governments Hyper Focused K-12 & HigherEd Cyber Response And Reporting Activity/Efforts
Posted in Commentary with tags Security on November 3, 2022 by itnerdThere’s been a lot of activity this week on education cybersecurity. Starting with the federal student aid CISO begging the government to make cyber incident reporting for higher education institutions to be at the same standard as K-12 institutions, and a recent report from the GAO criticizing the U.S. Department of Education for not sufficiently coordinating communication between school districts and the feds on cybersecurity.
Stan Golubchik, Co-Founder and CEO, ContraForce, works directly with K-12 and higher education institutions to detect attacks and incidents. In response to Educause’s annual conference, specifically the education department and federal student aid office CISO on cyber incident reporting, Stan says:
“While there are over 9,000 EdTech tools in the K12 space, it is unknown how many tools are actually used in Higher Education (HigherEd institutions are not held to the same standards of reporting as K12). This is precisely why the government is begging HigherEd to report on cyber attacks— because today, there is no reason for private colleges to report anything to anyone.”
“With the proliferation of remote education and SaaS applications, colleges struggle with knowing when incidents occur due to the distributed educational footprint. They lack visibility to security threats when they occur, and lack effective incident response plans and systems. With loose regulations on what should be reported in times of a breach, colleges will struggle to not only gather the information needed for reporting a breach but to understand what information is needed and how to communicate it.”
It’s pretty clear that cybersecurity within education needs to be a key focus as this is where threat actors will focus as the education sector tends not to have the same resources available for cybersecurity versus other organization. Effectively making them soft targets. Any sort of soft target needs to be eliminated so that everyone is safer as a result.
Leave a comment »