Archive for January 3, 2024

Resecurity Uncovers Cybercriminal Faction Known As “GXC Team”

Posted in Commentary with tags on January 3, 2024 by itnerd

Resecurity has uncovered a cybercriminal faction known as “GXC Team”, who have introduced a new tool that incorporates Artificial Intelligence (AI) for creating fraudulent invoices used for Wire Fraud and Business E-Mail Compromise (BEC).

In this case, the creator of the tool effectively utilized AI for a specialized task – identifying invoices containing payment details. Additionally, the tool is equipped with multilingual support, enabling it to process and understand data in various languages, a crucial feature for handling invoices written in different languages.

 According to an FBI IC3 report, successful BEC scams (such as invoice fraud) resulted in an average loss of over $120,000 per incident, inflicting a staggering financial toll of more than $2.4 billion on organizations. FINCEN advisory states criminals continue to exploit vulnerable business processes with such schemes – generating over $9 billion in losses affecting financial institutions and their customers since 2016.

Presently, the tools crafted by the “GXC Team” are capable of targeting over 300 entities, including top financial institutions, government services, postal services, cryptocurrency platforms, payment networks, and major international online marketplaces including AMEX, Amazon, Binance, Coinbase, Helifax, Office 365 (Microsoft), PayPal, ING, Santander, Deutsche Bank, Postbank, DKB AG (Das kann Bank), BBBank eG (formerly Badische Beamtenbank) and multiple Spain-based banks specifically including ABANCA, Banca March, Banco de Sabadell, Grupo Caja Rural, Unicaja Banco SA, Caixa Enginyers, Banco Mediolanum, Laboral Kutxa, Eurocaja Dynamic, BBVA, and Santander.

Besides AI to scale operations, in a novel approach to circumvent two-factor authentication (2FA), the perpetrators crafted malicious Android code that mimics official mobile banking applications. Victims are tricked into installing this fake app under the guise of confirming their OTP (One-Time Password), which is then intercepted and transmitted to a command-and-control (C2C) server managed by the attacker. The necessary login credentials for online banking systems are previously harvested through a phishing kit. Once the OTP is intercepted, the malicious actor can access the victim’s banking account, utilizing geographically relevant residential proxies to facilitate the unauthorized access.

The “GXC Team” has also created several kits designed to pilfer identity information from Australian and Spanish citizens through the use of fake government websites. In the case of Australia, the actors impersonated the “my.gov.au” portal, luring victims into providing their personal information, which was then maliciously collected. This tactic underscores their commitment to identity theft and the exploitation of unsuspecting individuals through deceptive online means. In the case of Spain, the “GXC Team” created a landing page that impersonated one of the official “gob.es” websites. This fake page claimed to support payments through multiple banks, all with the aim of gaining the victim’s trust by presenting content that appeared to originate from an official government site. This approach was used to deceive individuals into sharing sensitive information with malicious actors.

According to Resecurity Hunter Unit’s assessment, the most promising areas for applying AI in cybercriminal activities include:

  • Content generation for malicious and fraudulent purposes, with the goal of optimizing human resources and scaling operations.
  • Recognition of specific objects and targets through text processing and document analysis.
  • Decision-making and automation of cybercriminal operations.
  • Utilizing AI-driven bots for advanced social engineering techniques.
  • Analyzing and scoring potential victims, studying their behavior, and detecting patterns for more effective targeting and exploitation.
  • Bypass of anti-fraud filters and cybersecurity controls (for e.g. using Deep Fakes and AI-generated artifacts).
  • Influence and interference campaigns where AI will be used for emotional sentiment analysis, targeting activity and actual engagement with the audience (for e.g. in social media networks and alternative digital channels).

You can read more about this here: https://www.resecurity.com/blog/article/cybercriminals-implemented-artificial-intelligence-ai-for-invoice-fraud

Xerox Subsidiary Pwned… And Xerox May Be Negotiating

Posted in Commentary with tags on January 3, 2024 by itnerd

Xerox has confirmed a cyber attack on its US subsidiary Xerox Business Solutions. INC Ransom posted Xerox on its leak blog, but recently removed it (including leaked documents), meaning negotiations are likely underway.

Darren Williams, CEO and Founder, BlackFog had this comment:

“While it remains unclear whether Xerox is in negotiations with INC Ransom, the removal of their leaked documents implies ongoing discussion may be taking place. Given that data exfiltration claims were made by the ransomware group, the company is likely scrambling to safeguard not only themselves but their customers. Negotiating with cybercriminals is highly discouraged and should be avoided at all costs. Paying a ransom or even just entering into negotiations builds confidence within the cybercriminal network and provides an incentive for future attacks on the same company, and others alike. Once it becomes known that there is a willingness to cooperate, cybercriminals are likely to persist in their attacks.”

I second the sentiment that nobody should pay a ransom when they are hit with a cyberattack. It emboldens threat actors and it doesn’t guarantee that the threat actors will keep their end of the deal. Thus protection and a plan to deal with an attack that doesn’t involve paying a ransom has to be in every companies cybersecurity playbook.

Twitter’s API Limits Hinders Japan From Warning Their Citizens Of Natural Disasters

Posted in Commentary with tags on January 3, 2024 by itnerd

Last week Japan had a major earthquake that had a magnitude of 7.6 and caused Tsunami warnings. Now that’s bad. But what’s worse is that NERV which puts out warnings about natural disasters that Japanese citizens rely upon was hindered for about three hours or so by Twitter’s API limits:

“Our accounts appear to have been rate-limited due to the frequent posting of information updates regarding the Ishikawa Earthquake and Tsunami,” NERV’s English-language Twitter/X account posted just over two hours after the earthquake. Rate limits are restrictions on the number of posts an account can make within a set time period.

NERV also shared a similar message on its Japanese account, advising people to download its app for realtime updates instead.

Fortunately, NERV later stated that Twitter/X had reached out to urgently register both its Japanese and English-language accounts as “Public Utility” accounts, “resolving the issue of API rate-limiting.” Unfortunately, this fix reportedly came almost three hours after NERV said it was first rate-limited, leaving a significant window where it was unable to share potentially lifesaving information about the ongoing disaster.

This is another example of how far Twitter has fallen. In the past, Twitter used to be the go to place for real time events and information. But thanks to Elon Musk’s desire to destroy the platform, this is no longer the case. What this example illustrates is that government agencies around the world need to find alternate means to communicate with their citizens. Because it’s clear that Twitter is no longer fit for that purpose. And that could cost lives if it hasn’t already.