You might recall that Apple got into a lot of trouble with the original BatteryGate situation a few years ago. To summarize that situation, Apple got into deep trouble when it was discovered that the performance of iPhones would nosedive when the batteries inside them degraded to the point where they couldn’t sustain the performance levels that users were used to. And Apple did not tell anyone this was the case. Apple since has done a lot to make this clear to users, and they not only allowed users to get their batteries replaced cheaply for a limited time, but they also allowed users to see the health of their battery and offered free replacements if you had AppleCare and the battery health dropped below 80% in the first two years. But, by the time that Apple did all that, it cost them hundreds of millions of dollars and a lot of scrutiny from governments around the world. Which of course wasn’t good for Apple.
History may be repeating itself as there are now reports that the battery health in the iPhone 14 models is dropping faster than previous iPhone models. Here’s a few posts from some prominent creators who are seeing this:
This is now starting to hit the media with media outlets such as The Verge and The Wall Street Journal running stories on this topic. Several iPhone 14 series owners have taken to other places like Reddit to report deteriorating battery capacity on their handsets.
For giggles I checked the battery health on my iPhone 14 Pro. you can do the same thing by going to Settings –> Battery –> Battery Health & Charging. In my case I got this:

To me that doesn’t seem so bad. But I am missing some context here. Apple doesn’t tell you how many charge cycles that your phone has. By that I mean how many times the battery in my phone has been discharged and charged. I decided to use a utility called Coconut Battery to get that information:

The figure I was looking for was the cycle count. In my case the phone has been discharged and charged 273 times as I type this. And I tend to use wireless charging most of the time which introduces heat to the equation. And heat is the number one enemy of lithium ion batteries when it comes to their longevity. So having 94% battery health (or 95.3% according to Coconut Battery) seems somewhat reasonable to me after just under a year of usage. And to add further context to this, my previous iPhone 12 Pro was at 89% battery health by the time it was a year old. So the iPhone 14 Pro is an improvement for me. But clearly others are having a different experience with their iPhone 14’s.
So is this BatteryGate 2.0? Or put another way, is there an issue with the batteries inside the iPhone 14 models? Perhaps there’s a software issue with iOS 16? I think it’s too early to tell what the issue is and where it lies to be honest. I am sure that when these reports started to surface, Apple started to look at the data that it has access to to figure out if there’s an issue as I am sure that they don’t want a BatteryGate 2.0 situation. Whether we get an answer from Apple directly is an open question as they are not the most communicative company around.
In the meantime, Apple has some tips on how to keep your battery health in the best possible place. That might be worth looking at, along with this document which details how batteries work in relation to iDevices. But let me throw this out there in terms of what I would do if I were you. I would keep an eye on your battery health, but you should not obsess over it. If you have AppleCare, and the battery drops below 80% within two years, Apple will replace the battery for free. (By the way, that’s a great incentive to get AppleCare as it makes this situation a non-issue.)
In the meantime, there needs to be better understanding as to why iPhone 14 models seem to have batteries that degrade faster than previous models in some cases. Having that understanding will help to put this issue to bed. Thus I call on Apple to be as open as it can when it comes to this issue. If they have information on this, they should be as transparent as possible and share it. Otherwise users of iPhone 14’s will just assume that Apple has something to hide and do what they did the last time BatteryGate was a thing. Which is get angry, and sue. And governments will once again assume that Apple has something to hide, investigate, and take corrective action against Apple.
For the rest of us, maybe we should relax and see what comes of this. Maybe there’s something here. Maybe this is a nothing burger. Who knows? But let’s get some facts first to figure out what side of the fence this falls on.


The MOVEit Flaw Has Claimed More Victims
Posted in Commentary with tags Hacked on August 16, 2023 by itnerdMOVEit Seems to be the gift that keeps on giving for hackers as two more organizations have been added to the list of victims. Let’s start with The Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing (HCPF) who was pwned by hackers who targeted IBM according to this notice. And according to this, over 4 million people have been affected.
Ani Chaudhuri, CEO, Dasera had this comment on this massive breach:
Indeed, the MOVEit software breach incident at IBM that led to Colorado HCPF’s data exposure is just the tip of the iceberg in what appears to be a larger vulnerability affecting several organizations. While the specific details about every breached entity might not always be public, it is imperative to understand that the software’s widespread usage makes it an attractive target. The recent disclosure by Colorado State University, which was similarly breached due to the vulnerability in the MOVEit Transfer software, affecting thousands of students and staff, underscores the urgency. If MOVEit’s vulnerability can affect educational institutions of such magnitude, it stands to reason that healthcare providers with a similar reliance on the software could be at equal, if not greater, risk, given the value of health data in the dark market.
In light of these breaches, healthcare providers must take a multi-pronged approach to damage containment:
While the current scenario paints a grim picture, it’s also an opportunity. An opportunity for healthcare providers to reevaluate, reinvent, and fortify their data protection mechanisms, ensuring the sanctity of patient data now and in the future.
Now let’s move on to New York Life who was exposed to the MOVEit Transfer attack via a third-party vendor Pension Benefit Information (PBI):
According to PBI’s letter to the Maine Attorney General, the attack exposed 25,685 NYLIC-related individuals. The breach notification indicates that threat actors accessed individuals’ Social Security numbers (SSNs).
Losing SSNs poses significant risks, as impersonators can use stolen data in tandem with names and driver’s license numbers for identity theft.
Again, Ani Chaudhuri, CEO, Dasera has a comment on this:
The current digital landscape’s complexities have led us into an era where even the most reputable companies are vulnerable to sophisticated cyber-attacks. It’s terrible to see global giants like New York Life Insurance Company (NYLIC), Prudential Insurance, and many others fall prey to the MOVEit Transfer attacks. It underscores the fundamental challenge many corporations face: it’s not just about securing your environment but ensuring that every part of your digital supply chain is equally fortified.
First and foremost, our sympathies should lie with the companies and the millions of individuals impacted by these breaches. Having one’s personal and sensitive information exposed is a severe violation of trust and can have long-lasting repercussions. However, it’s important to remember that in many of these cases, the breached entities themselves were not the primary weak link. Instead, third-party vulnerabilities became the gateway for malicious actors to access data.
In this instance, the trend of targeting third-party vendors and systems, such as PBI, has become increasingly prevalent. It’s a cunning tactic from cybercriminals: why attack the fortress directly when you can exploit a lesser-protected entry point? Herein lies the crux of the issue: in a globally interconnected digital ecosystem, your security posture is only as strong as the weakest link in your chain.
Furthermore, this is not merely an IT or a “tech” problem—it’s a holistic business challenge. Given the increasing interdependence on third-party vendors and platforms for various services, it’s more crucial than ever for organizations to embed data governance and security into their core strategy deeply. As we’ve seen, merely patching software vulnerabilities is a reactive measure; we need proactive, comprehensive approaches that account for the entire data lifecycle and all its touchpoints.
So, what can we take away from this calamity?
Every organization and individual to empathize with the affected companies and end-users. In today’s intricate digital web, any entity, regardless of size or reputation, can find itself under siege. Instead of distancing ourselves from those affected, we should draw closer, share knowledge, and fortify our collective defense. Cybersecurity isn’t a competitive advantage; it’s a shared responsibility.
In both of these cases, organizations were pwned because some other organization was exposed to MOVEit. Thus you have to wonder how many other organizations are exposed to this threat which right now seems completely out of control.
Leave a comment »