Archive for June 22, 2026

Rogers & Fido Customers See $4-$5 Increase…. Some Just Joined…. WTF?

Posted in Commentary with tags on June 22, 2026 by itnerd

Truly from the WTF category comes this $4-$5 increase in their cellular bills from Rogers (five dollars) and Fido (four dollars). And to add insult to injury comes the fact that some people have joined as little as three months ago. Here’s what iPhone In Canada posted:

Rogers is adding a $5 monthly increase for select wireless customers, set to kick in on or after July 15, 2026. The justification mirrors what Fido told its own customers, a vague nod to network investment. The note on Rogers bills says the company continuously invests in its 5G network to deliver “Canada’s most reliable” experience, and that the monthly fee for affected plans is going up by $5 plus tax to help cover those costs.

Instead of just raising the plan price outright, Rogers is tacking the charge on as its own line item called Wireless Plan Rate Adjustment. That wording has already drawn criticism online, with some customers pointing out that breaking the fee out separately might be a way to get around price guarantees or fixed-rate promises.

What being talked about here is that the CRTC has hit the big three hard in terms of junk fees that stop people from moving carriers easier. So instead of explicitly calling out the fee increases, Rogers and Fido are instead shifting the prices around to bury them as much as possible so that they can’t be called out . Rogers for its part said this on their bill:

“We continuously invest to bring you Canada’s most reliable 5G+ network and the best mobile experience in Canada.”We continuously invest to bring you Canada’s most reliable 5G+ network and the best mobile experience in Canada. To help support these investments, the monthly fee (Monthly Charge) for your wireless price plan will increase by $5 (plus taxes), starting with your next bill, on or after July 15, 2026. This will appear as an additional line item under Monthly Charges on your monthly bill called Wireless Plan Rate Adjustment. The rest of your wireless services remain the same. If you have any questions or no longer wish to subscribe to your wireless service, please reach out to us as indicated in the Contact Us section of this bill.”

But people are not impressed. Some of which phoned me out of desperation. My advice is simple. Freedom Mobile hasn’t got the best coverage. But they have good enough coverage that for most people, their travels in the GTA are good enough. Ditto for many metropolitan areas as well. Plus they have done away with the junk fees that the CRTC is trying to ban. That on top of the fact that my last few trips overseas has seen a substantial reduction in roaming charges. While Freedom isn’t for everyone, that is a solution for Rogers (and ultimately TELUS and Bell) screwing customers over.

Just a thought.

FortiBleed – New SOCRadar In-Depth Technical Analysis Published 

Posted in Commentary with tags on June 22, 2026 by itnerd

After several days spent reverse-engineering the attacker’s environment, the SOCRadar research team has published a new, in-depth technical analysis on the FortiBleed campaign, including the attacker’s infrastructure, tooling, and methods.


Summary:

FortiBleed is a large-scale, still-active credential-harvesting campaign targeting internet-facing Fortinet FortiGate firewalls — hundreds of thousands of devices in scope worldwide. It is important to state plainly what it is not: this is not a zero-day or a newly disclosed software vulnerability. It is a credential and access operation. Attackers compromise exposed firewalls, harvest the authentication traffic and credentials passing through them, crack what they capture, and sell that access on. The actor fits the profile of a financially-motivated initial access broker — the kind whose intrusions become the front end of someone else’s ransomware or data-extortion event.

Why it matters — and the number to focus on. At the time of writing, more than 19,000 FortiGate devices were still being actively sniffed by the attackers — part of a broader 80,553 identified targets. That present tense is the point: this is not a historical data dump to clean up after, but a live operation, running since at least February 2026, quietly capturing authentication traffic as users log in each day. Because the firewall sits at the network edge, a compromise there can expose an organization’s entire identity layer — and the campaign reaches deep into supply chains, since MSPs and IT-services firms that manage Fortinet devices for others are squarely in the targeting.

What’s new in this report:

  • A custom Golang tool (“FortigateSniffer”) that abuses a legitimate FortiOS diagnostic command to passively capture authentication traffic from a compromised firewall — leaving no malware behind and largely evading traditional detection.
  • Targeting beyond Fortinet. The attacker’s own infrastructure contained reconnaissance/target lists for other edge platforms — a 29,270-entry Citrix login-URL list and roughly 247,584 Sophos SSL-VPN portals — showing the operation’s scanning was multi-vendor, not Fortinet-exclusive. (To be precise: these are targeting artifacts; we did not find captured credentials for the Citrix or Sophos tracks, so we characterize them as in-scope for reconnaissance rather than confirmed compromise.)
  • Attacker infrastructure far larger than the single exposed server first reported — 150+ servers — plus the operators’ use of rented GPU compute and agentic tooling.


What goes deeper: The report maps the full attack chain end to end — reconnaissance, initial access, credential cracking, lateral movement into Active Directory, and exfiltration — with indicators of compromise, file hashes, a MITRE ATT&CK mapping, and the attribution clues pointing to a Russian-speaking access broker.

What it corroborates: Several findings independently align with other published research, which we think is worth noting rather than glossing over: the Sophos figure (~247,584) matches what others observed, as do the scale of the MSSQL brute-forcing and the confirmed deep intrusion at a defense contractor. Where the picture is still uncertain — full attribution, for instance — is noted as well.

To view the full report, see Dismantling FortiBleed: Inside a Russian Fortinet Compromise Operation 

Klue Hack Has A Bunch Of Companies Caught In The Blast Radius

Posted in Commentary with tags on June 22, 2026 by itnerd

Here’s something that you should pay attention to. Market intelligence platform Klue suffered a OAuth breach. That is back. But via a blog post it is much worse.

On June 12, we identified unauthorized activity affecting a portion of Klue’s integration infrastructure. Since then, we’ve been working alongside trusted cybersecurity experts to understand what happened, support our customers, and restore the connections you rely on. Our investigation determined that an attacker gained access through a compromised legacy credential associated with an integration service. The attacker used that access to obtain OAuth tokens used to connect Klue with certain third-party platforms, including Salesforce, and subsequently accessed data within a number of connected customer environments. Based on our investigation to date, the incident was limited to the affected third-party platforms, and there is no evidence that customer content stored within the Klue platform was impacted. We recognize that customers rely on Klue to securely connect to their systems, and we understand the seriousness of that responsibility.

Since then, several companies have come forward to confirm they had data stolen during the attack, including Gong, Jamf, HackerOne, Insurity, OneTrust, Recorded Future, Snyk, Sprout Social, and Tanium. The growing list of cybersecurity firms disclosing the impact from the this hack is a striking data point: These are organizations that build security for a living, ran standard vendor assessments, and still got caught in the blast radius. That’s not a failure of due diligence. That’s a failure of due diligence to actually measure.

Justin Beals, CEO & Founder, Strike Graph, an AI-native GRC and compliance automation platform had this to say:

“Cybersecurity vendors getting breached through a shared SaaS dependency is the clearest possible signal that the questionnaire model of third-party risk is broken. These are companies that build security for a living. They did their due diligence. It didn’t matter, because due diligence in TPRM today is still mostly measuring what vendors say about themselves, not what their controls actually do. Traditional TPRM tools have true positive detection rates below 30%. That’s not a risk management program. That’s a paper trail. The Klue incident is going to keep expanding because the underlying failure, trusting attestations over verified evidence, is industry-wide. Until organizations move from point-in-time assessments to continuous, evidence-validated controls across their vendor ecosystem, the blast radius of the next shared dependency breach is going to be just as wide.”

Seeing as you are only as secure as the guy you work with, you have to take your time and put a whole lot of effort into maintaining security. Otherwise this because more of the norm rather than the exception.

Threat Actors Targeting Orgs through Microsoft 365 Collaboration Features Says Fortra

Posted in Commentary with tags on June 22, 2026 by itnerd

Fortra Intelligence and Research Experts (FIRE) are tracking phishing activity embedded within Microsoft 365 collaboration features such as Outlook Groups, shared files, and calendars. Attackers are using these trusted workflows to introduce seemingly routine updates or meetings that lead users toward risky actions.

In the attacks, victims are targeted through repeated exposure. The user is not expected to take action with the initial email, but rather, see the tentative meeting, open the event, review the description, click a link, or open a referenced file, making it critical for security teams to monitor collaboration activity holistically. Organizations that fall victim could experience credential theft, data exposure, service disruption, and more. 

Read details from the FIRE team here: https://www.fortra.com/blog/phishing-through-collaboration

The Technology Behind the Call

Posted in Commentary with tags on June 22, 2026 by itnerd

In the heat of the game, on the sport’s largest stage, mere millimetres can be the difference between winning and losing.

Ultimately, it will be the players on the pitch during FIFA World Cup 26™ that decide the outcome of the match. But as the games unfold, it is critical that calls made by the officials are correct — and when the referee jogs over to the sideline to doublecheck the video of a play, precision matters.

Hisense is the Official VAR Review TV provider for FIFA World Cup 2026™, equipping FIFA with all of the screens installed in the VAR room at the International Broadcast Centre during FIFA tournaments and the primary review monitors for referees making offside, handball, goal and foul determinations.

The Hisense sideline apparatus used by referees during the FIFA Club World Cup 2025™ is one of the interactive exhibits on display at Soccer and Technology from the FIFA Museum, an exhibition making its first North American appearance at Science World in Vancouver through FIFA World Cup 2026™ festivities.

A similar set up to this display is being used by referees at all FIFA World Cup 2026™ games.

VAR demands an unusually high standard of display performance. Officials may be asked to judge the precise position of a player’s boot relative to a defensive line, the point of contact between a ball and an arm or the exact moment a pass is played. To support this level of scrutiny, FIFA’s exclusive VAR displays are equipped with Hisense’s pioneering RGB MiniLED technology, offering ultra-high resolution, exceptional colour accuracy and extremely low latency, ensuring that the image on screen faithfully represents the original footage without lag, distortion or motion blur. This real-time responsiveness ensures high brightness and contrast for accurate frame-by-frame analysis.

For VAR officials working under intense time pressure, this translates into clearer definition in fast‑moving plays and greater confidence when making decisions that may change the outcome of a match.

FIFA’s confidence in Hisense’s technology is reflected in its decision to grant exclusive VAR screen branding rights to the company — marking the first time a technology partner has been formally recognized in this aspect of officiating infrastructure.

As football continues to evolve, VAR underscores a broader truth explored in the FIFA Science and Soccer experience: Behind every split‑second decision lies a complex interplay of physics, perception, and technology — where seeing clearly can make all the difference.

Soccer & Technology from the FIFA Museum is now open at Science World and will run until September 7th. From the pitch to the broadcast booth, the exhibition offers a deep dive into soccer’s evolving ecosystem. Guests can explore five core sections: Broadcasting and Media, Intelligent Data, Refereeing and Fair Play, Staging the Game and the Innovation Lab, exploring how evolving technology shapes the innovation, preparation, action, enjoyment and analysis of soccer games.

For more information, please visit hisense-canada.com

TELUS Friendly Future Foundation Gala raises record $3M to transform lives of underserved youth across Canada with Lionel Richie headlining event

Posted in Commentary with tags on June 22, 2026 by itnerd

The TELUS Friendly Future Foundation’s Together for Tomorrow Gala raised a record-breaking $3M on June 18, creating new opportunities for underserved youth across Canada through post-secondary bursaries and community programs designed to help them thrive. More than 800 guests gathered for an evening of entertainment and impact, highlighted by an exclusive headline performance by four-time Grammy award winner Lionel Richie. The event was held at the iconic TELUS Centre for Performance and Learning in Toronto and also welcomed TELUS Student Bursary recipients and grant beneficiaries as honoured guests.

Presented by TELUS, the gala brought together hundreds of leaders from Canada’s business, philanthropic, technology, and arts communities. The evening’s generous support will fund the TELUS Student Bursary program and TELUS Community Board Grants, supporting thousands of young Canadians through bursaries, mentorship opportunities and community-based programs that help remove barriers to education, employment and well-being. 

The evening builds on the recent announcement of TELUS President and Chief Executive Officer Darren Entwistle and Fiona Entwistle’s landmark $1 million personal donation to the TELUS Friendly Future Foundation. This transformative gift officially launched the Entwistle Technology Bursary, designed to open doors for youth in financial need pursuing post-secondary education in science, math, and technology who are committed to making a positive difference in their communities. The generous donation has inspired further community support, as evidenced by the exceptional fundraising results from last Thursday’s gala.

Building on the success of the first two galas, this year’s third annual event brings the three-year total to over $8.1M. This achievement reinforces the Foundation’s position as Canada’s preeminent corporate foundation dedicated to youth empowerment. Since inception, the TELUS Friendly Future Foundation and TELUS Community Boards across Canada have provided $140 million to support youth. In 2025 alone, the Foundation exceeded $10 million in awarded TELUS Student Bursaries and Community Board grants. 

Since 2000, TELUS and its team members have contributed more than $1.85 billion in cash, in-kind contributions, time and programs and volunteered 2.5 million days to support communities around the world.

The Foundation extends sincere gratitude to presenting sponsor TELUS, and all donors, sponsors and partners who made this remarkable event possible, including:

  • Luminary Sponsor: Darren & Fiona Entwistle
  • Trailblazer Sponsor: RBC Capital Markets
  • Innovator Sponsors: AECON, Asurion, Amazon, BGIS, CIBC, Garofalo Family Foundation, Google Cloud, Ledcor, National Bank, Samsung, The&Partnership, TD Securities, WestJet
  • Activation sponsors: AFL, Amdocs, BMO Capital Markets 

Every young person deserves the chance to reach their full potential. To support the TELUS Friendly Future Foundation’s mission of helping underserved youth across Canada access education, opportunity and brighter futures, visit friendlyfuture.com/donate. For organizations, foundations, and philanthropists interested in creating lasting impact through named bursary opportunities or strategic partnerships, please contact Louise Malhotra at lmalhotra@friendlyfuture.com.

Guest Post: One account to rule them all: Canadians keep saving passwords in their browsers — and hackers know it

Posted in Commentary with tags on June 22, 2026 by itnerd

A new study by NordPass reveals that most users store their passwords in their web browser, prioritizing ease of use over digital safety. Because browser-based credentials are often tethered to a user’s primary account, a single breach can leave an entire digital life exposed.

To understand password storage habits, researchers surveyed consumers in eight countries: the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. The study found that browser-based saving is the default choice for the vast majority (around 40-50%) of respondents, effectively creating a single point of failure. When this habit is paired with password reuse, it creates a digital house of cards that collapses if just one account is breached.

“Convenience and ease of use dominate as the top two drivers, confirming that browser password saving is overwhelmingly a comfort-driven behavior — with cost and passive auto-save prompts playing a secondary but consistent role,” says Karolis Arbaciauskas, head of product at NordPass and its parent organisation, Nord Security.

Canadians lean on a deceptively risky habit

According to the survey, Canadians are the second most likely to combine browser-based and third-party password managers. As many as 16% of Canadian respondents use this hybrid approach — behind only the US (18%). Meanwhile, 37% save their passwords exclusively in their browser, and only 13% rely on a dedicated password manager alone.

In fact, more Canadians use a combined approach than a dedicated manager on its own — a pattern shared with the US, Australia, and the UK, but reversed across most EU countries.

“Combining a browser-based password manager with a third-party tool is incorrectly assumed to be a safe way to maintain a backup. However, if the passwords stored in the browser are compromised, the backup does little to protect them. Password reuse only sharpens this problem,” says Arbaciauskas.

Distinct habits around the world

Canadians are far from alone in their reliance on browsers to save their passwords, but habits vary widely across the eight countries surveyed. Spanish users are the most security conscious. Nearly one in five (19%) respondents from Spain stated that they use a dedicated password manager. In contrast, only 8% of Italians use such a tool.

German users are the most tool-averse in general, with the highest share (22%) relying purely on memory. France stands out for its love of the analogue. As many as 13% of French respondents still write their passwords down on paper.

According to Arbaciauskas, the habit of memorizing passwords — prevalent in Germany, Australia, Canada, and the UK — often leads to the reuse of identical or very similar credentials (such as swapping only a single letter or number). These memory-friendly passwords are far easier to breach, potentially triggering a chain reaction where a single leak compromises most, if not all, of a user’s accounts.

Convenience comes at the cost of risk

Convenience comes at a steep price. Browser-based managers are usually tethered to the user’s primary account (e.g., Google, Microsoft, etc.). If a hacker compromises that single account, they don’t just get your emails — they get the jackpot of every credential stored in that browser.

“Browser-based password managers are certainly a better choice than simply reusing or slightly altering the same password everywhere. However, dedicated password managers offer distinct advantages, such as encryption based on zero-knowledge architecture. This means all data is encrypted on your device before it ever leaves your computer or smartphone, ensuring that not even the developers can access your passwords — let alone anyone else,” says Arbaciauskas.

Unlike browser-based password managers, dedicated tools are not tied to any ecosystem and work seamlessly across all major browsers and operating systems, making password syncing across devices simple. This is particularly important if you use multiple browsers or devices. It also saves time and effort when you decide to or need to switch to another operating system.

Furthermore, dedicated password managers offer additional security features — such as a data breach scanner, password health checker, email masking, and secure document storage — that are often missing from browser-based managers.

Methodology

The quantitative research on password storage habits was conducted by Nord Security on March 26–April 4, 2026, and included 1009 Canadian residents aged 18–74, as part of a wider eight-country study of 7,861 respondents from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK, and the US.