Last week, news came to light that AT&T had been pwned and literally every customer had been affected. Now there’s even worse news:
US telecom giant AT&T, which disclosed Friday that hackers had stolen the call records for tens of millions of its customers, paid a member of the hacking team more than $300,000 to delete the data and provide a video demonstrating proof of deletion.
The hacker, who is part of the notorious ShinyHunters hacking group that has stolen data from a number of victims through unsecured Snowflake cloud storage accounts, tells WIRED that AT&T paid the ransom in May. He provided the address for the cryptocurrency wallet that sent the currency to him, as well as the address that received it. WIRED confirmed, through an online blockchain tracking tool, that a payment transaction occurred on May 17 in the amount of 5.7 bitcoin. Chris Janczewski, head of global investigations for crypto-tracing firm TRM Labs, also confirmed using the company’s own tracking tool that a transaction occurred in the amount of about 5.72 bitcon (the equivalent of $373,646 at the time of the transaction), and that the money was then laundered through several cryptocurrency exchanges and wallets, but said there was no indication of who controlled the wallets.
A security researcher who asked to be identified only by his online handle, Reddington, also confirmed that a payment occurred. The hacker enlisted him to serve as the go-between for their negotiation with AT&T, and Reddington received a fee from AT&T for serving in that capacity. Reddington provided WIRED with proof of the fee payment. The hacker initially demanded $1 million from AT&T but ultimately agreed to a third of that.
WIRED viewed the video that the hacker says he provided to AT&T as proof to the telecom that he had deleted its stolen data from his computer. AT&T did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment.
I’ve been very clear that paying a ransom is something that you should never, ever do as it only encourages more of this behaviour from threat actors. This news really sucks for someone like me as I want these sorts of attacks by threat actors to end.
Pity.
February’s AT&T Outage Was Worse Than Anyone Thought Says The FCC
Posted in Commentary with tags AT&T on July 25, 2024 by itnerdEarlier this week, the FCC put out a report on the fact that AT&T had a massive outage back in February. And that report basically says that said outage was not only bad, it was worse than anyone thought.
“All voice and 5G data services for AT&T wireless customers were unavailable, affecting more than 125 million devices, blocking more than 92 million voice calls, and preventing more than 25,000 calls to 911 call centers,” the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) said in its report.
The 911 failures are the biggest problem here for reasons that are easy to understand. There’s nothing worse than trying to reach 911 in an emergency and being unable to get through. The FCC report does show that AT&T attempted to restore FirstNet (First Responder Network Authority) first before residential and commercial AT&T users, which sounds like the correct way to go about it.
However, the FCC also criticized AT&T for several failures on top of failing to test the implementation of the network change. The FCC pointed to a lack of oversight and controls to ensure test that processes were followed or that the processes themselves were insufficient. AT&T was also unprepared for the congestion caused by user devices attempting to reconnect to the network at the same time. AT&T’s network was insufficiently robust to mitigate the congestion.
Some of this sounds like what Canadians experienced a couple of years ago with the epic Rogers outage. A executive summary on that outage said that Rogers had a change management process that was suspect. Which sounds like AT&T’s lack of oversight and controls.
What is it with top telcos seemingly YOLO‘ing things, and having things go off the rails as a result?
John Gunn, CEO, Token
Just as the FDA ensures the food we eat doesn’t kill us, and the FAA ensures we have safe air travel, we need a regulatory agency to implement broad and stringent regulations to ensure the reliability and continuity of the digital services that are inextricably integrated into almost every aspect of our lives. No one should be a fan of additional regulation, but clearly, we are failing without it.
Mr. Gunn is right. Telcos need to be held to a higher standard and completely accountable for stuff like this. And that’s on both sides of the border. Perhaps lawmakers will do something and ensure that YOLO’ing anything has consequences.
Leave a comment »