Archive for Toyota

Toyota Suffers Data Breach… This Is Not Good For Them

Posted in Commentary with tags , on June 1, 2023 by itnerd

Toyota who is one of the biggest carmakers on planet Earth, has admitted to a major data breach:

On May 12, Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) announced “Apology and Notice Concerning Potential Data Leakage of of Customer Information Due to Misconfiguration of Cloud Environment (Japanese only)” Subsequently, we conducted an investigation for all cloud environments managed by TOYOTA Connected Corporation (TC). It was further discovered that a part of the data containing customer information had been potentially accessible externally. We would like to inform you of the incident that has been identified as of today.

As we believe that this incident also was caused by insufficient dissemination and enforcement of data handling rules, since our last announcement, we have implemented a system to monitor cloud configurations. Currently, the system is in operation to check the settings of all cloud environments and to monitor the settings on an ongoing basis. In addition, we will work closely again with TC to explain and thoroughly enforce the rules for data handling. We will also work to prevent a recurrence by thoroughly educating our employees once again. We sincerely apologize to our customers and all relevant parties for any concern and inconvenience this may have caused.

We have also investigated whether, with this incident, there was any secondary use or if third-party copies remain on the Internet, and no evidence of such has been found. At present, we have not confirmed any secondary damage. (Vehicle location, credit card information, etc., are not included in this incident)

This does not look good for Toyota. Ani Chaudhuri, CEO, Dasera had this to say:

The recent discovery of misconfigured cloud services within Toyota Motor Corp., leading to a significant data breach, is a stark reminder of the inherent risks of storing customer information on the cloud. The breach affected 260,000 Toyota car owners over seven years, exposing personal information such as their car’s internet services usage, location, entertainment preferences, and potentially other personal details.

This incident, occurring just two weeks after the exposure of data of 2.15 million customers due to another misconfigured cloud bucket, underscores the urgency and necessity for meticulous data governance and stringent cybersecurity protocols. The age of digitization carries both promise and peril, and it is incumbent upon organizations to secure their digital assets effectively and efficiently.

This unfortunate event raises important questions: Why was the misconfiguration not detected for such a long time? Could a proactive and automated monitoring system for data security have mitigated this incident? This illustrates the importance of diligent data governance practices, which include timely detection, alerts, and remediation of such vulnerabilities.

While it is crucial to leverage cloud technologies for business growth, it is equally critical to ensure the robustness of their security posture. It should be noted that handling sensitive customer data is not just a technical issue; it is a matter of trust. Every breach erodes that trust, and rebuilding it can be a Herculean task.

As we venture further into the digital age, companies need to view data security not as an afterthought, but as an integral part of their business strategy. Organizations must take a proactive approach, conducting regular audits, risk assessments, and training programs to safeguard their customer data. It is a daunting challenge, no doubt, but one that cannot be avoided in today’s interconnected world.

The Toyota breaches are a wake-up call to every organization handling sensitive data: Ensure your cloud configurations are secure, and protect your customers’ data as if it were your own.

This is a wake up call. Organizations can’t do a less than stellar job in terms making sure that data is protected. Because if they do, they will make headlines like this.

Toyota Gets Pwned By Hackers After Japan Joins Sanctions Against Russia

Posted in Commentary with tags , on February 28, 2022 by itnerd

Well, this is very coincidental.

Reuters has reported that Toyota has suspends domestic factory operations after suspected cyber attack.

Toyota Motor Corp said it will suspend domestic factory operations on Tuesday, losing around 13,000 cars of output, after a supplier of plastic parts and electronic components was hit by a suspected cyber attack.

No information was immediately available about who was behind the possible attack or the motive. The attack comes just after Japan joined Western allies in clamping down on Russia after it invaded Ukraine, although it was not clear if the attack was at all related.

Saryu Nayyar, CEO and Founder, Gurucul had this to say:

“Revenge based cyber attacks are nothing new, but we continue to see nation state attacks, if indeed Russia is the culprit, gain momentum beyond intellectual property theft to be used to actively disrupt infrastructure and economies. Russia especially has been at the forefront of using advanced threat tactics and both internal and external threat actors to further its political objectives. However, the reality that organizations face is that Russian interests extend to foreign businesses and they must take steps to improve their threat detection and response programs. Simply hardening defenses is not enough as these groups are mostly able to circumvent the perimeter and implant themselves successfully. Organizations need to look at advanced analytics, non-rule-based analytics and automation that is targeted and high-fidelity for faster detection, more context for investigations, and immediate response.”

This seems to me to be a case of cause and effect. As in Japan joins western allies in going after Russia. And then shortly afterwards one of the biggest and well known companies in Japan gets pwned by hackers. Which really makes Russia linked hackers the likely instigators of this. Yes, that hasn’t been proven yet. But there’s a lot of eyeballs on this, which means that if proof exists it will be found. And hopefully Russia is made to pay.

#Fail: Toyota Makes Owners Pay To Start Their Cars Via Their Key Fob

Posted in Commentary with tags on December 18, 2021 by itnerd

In one of the dumbest moves since BMW tried to make Apple CarPlay a subscription service, Toyota in their infinite wisdom has apparently decided that it’s a great idea for them to charge a subscription to let owners of Toyota vehicles start their cars using the key fobs:

A Toyota spokesperson confirmed to The Drive that if a 2018 or later Toyota is equipped with Toyota’s Remote Connect functions, the vehicle must be enrolled in a valid subscription in order for the key fob to start the car remotely. To be clear, what we’re talking about is the proximity-based RF remote start system, where you press a button on the fob to start the car while outside of it within a certain distance—say, from your front door to warm up your vehicle in the driveway on a cold morning before you get in. Your fob uses radio waves to communicate with the car, and no connection back to Toyota’s servers is needed. But the function will not work without a larger Remote Connect subscription.

This is frankly mind blowingly stupid. Why? It’s not as if I’m trying to start my car from my phone or Apple Watch. I can see them wanting to charge for that and I wouldn’t bat an eye if they did try to make a buck or two from that. But I’m talking about using the factory supplied key fob that is based on an RF radio. This tech has been around since the age of the dinosaurs. There’s no way on God’s green Earth that they should make you pay for that. In short, this is a very cynical attempt by Toyota to make a few bucks on a recurring basis.

All this does for me is ensure that I will never purchase a Toyota product. Just like I removed BMW off my list of cars that I would like to own. And I am going to go out on a limb and say that many other consumers will feel the same way.

Report: Toyota Not Integrating Android Auto Due To Privacy Concerns

Posted in Commentary with tags , on April 19, 2018 by itnerd

Toyota for the longest while has been pushing their on infotainment systems in their cars. But recently they’re rolling out Apple CarPlay in first the Avalon, and in the upcoming Lexus UX with more vehicles to come in the future. But many people have asked about support for Android Auto. When is that going to show up in a Toyota vehicle?

Well, Motor1 reports that the company isn’t integrating Android Auto because it is keen to protect the privacy of its customers:

“We’re a conservative company and we wanted to make sure everything was okay,” said Mark DeJongh, Avalon’s Executive Program Manager, about the company’s stance against Android Auto. He spoke during a Toyota first-drive event this week. “We wanted to protect our customers privacy. We strongly believe in our stance and in what we’re doing.”

Toyota isn’t the first car company to have issues with Android Auto. Porsche famously flipped the bird to Android Auto a few years ago, and to this day no Porsche model offers it as a feature. Google claims that there’s nothing to see here. But seeing as Android Auto apparently collects everything from speed, throttle position, coolant and oil temp, engine revs etc. every time it is used, you can see why a car maker might have a wee bit of a problem. This will be something that Google cannot ignore and it will be interesting to see if or how they address it.

Ford And Toyota Team Up On In Car Infomatics

Posted in Commentary with tags , on January 5, 2016 by itnerd

The two headed monster of Apple and Google has clearly spooked some car makers when it comes to in car infotainment systems. Why? There’s a bunch of reasons. Top of the list is the loss of control of customer data as well as the ability to make their particular systems unique enough to stand out from the crowd. That’s why I wasn’t surprised when the news slipped out yesterday that Toyota and Ford are teaming up on this front:

Toyota, the world’s largest automaker by vehicle sales, and Ford, the No. 2 U.S. automaker, said they will adopt a Ford-developed software called SmartDeviceLink, or SDL, as the standard for connecting smartphone apps to vehicle dashboard screens.

SDL technology integrates smartphones apps with vehicles through dashboard buttons, display screens and voice recognition technology. Using it as a standard for projecting navigation or music streaming apps from a driver’s smartphone could help Ford and Toyota reduce dependence on Apple or Alphabet Inc’s Google, company officials said.

This isn’t the first time that car companies have gone in a different direction from the one that Apple and Google want them to go. Mecedes Benz, VW, and BMW bought Nokia’s HERE mapping division for more or less the same reason. The real question is if this is something that the car buying public will respond to positively. I say that because some people want a in car system that comes from Apple or Google and nothing else will do. Thus we’ll have to wait and see how this shakes out.

Goodbye Toyota Matrix…. Hello Hyundai Tucson

Posted in Commentary with tags , on September 28, 2015 by itnerd

Our latest problem with our Toyota Matrix in regards to excessive oil consumption has been a real pain and it’s also been incredibly stressful for my wife and I. It led us to begin the process of looking for a new vehicle to replace it and we had deleted the Lexus NX200t from our list of contenders and added the Acura RDX, followed by my craptastic experience at a local Acura dealership when I went to see the RDX. Since then we got the results of the oil consumption test that Toyota wanted us to run. Which was that the Matrix consumed oil, but it was not bad enough by Toyota’s standards to be fixed on Toyota’s dime which didn’t exactly go over well in our household. Thus we started to look at all the contenders on the list at dealerships which included taking test drives as well as evaluate the dealerships. Let me tell you, that was not fun. The fact is that the car buying experience sucks. Lots of pressure. Lots of stress. Not nearly enough ability to make an informed decision. I should also mention that during all of this, my wife and I were literally bombarded by phone calls from any Toyota dealership that we had been to. For the record, there have been five in total that we’ve either gotten service done at, or we’ve bought parts from. What was interesting was that they were calling us to get us out of the Matrix and into pretty much anything else in the Toyota, Scion, or Lexus lineup. If that wasn’t enough, they all specifically mentioned that they’d give us “top dollar” for our Toyota Matrix. The fact that all of them started calling us after our oil consumption results came back has to be a coincidence. After all, this was happening at the time of year where dealerships are clearing out their inventory. So, that combined with the fact that my wife and I had a seven year old car which makes us a good target for a new one is a plausible reason why we were seeing this influx of calls. Though the conspiracy theorist in me does make me think of more nefarious reasons behind these phone calls.

All that changed when I got the opportunity to review the new Hyundai Tucson via Greg Carrasco of Hyundai Of Oakville who’ve I’ve not only interviewed twice, but I’ve been on his radio show several times. During my discussion with him, I discussed the problems with the Toyota Matrix and getting Toyota Canada to properly address it. I also asked him if I was overacting to the situation. He basically was dead honest with me and told me I wasn’t as well as going into a great deal of depth about what what wrong with the situation, and what my options were to deal with it. I really appreciated his honesty and it allowed my wife and I to pull the trigger on immediately dumping the Toyota Matrix.

Now, why the Hyundai Tucson? In short, we were impressed by it in a multitude of areas when we had it to do our review (As my wife is a big influence on what I write. Thus every review is a team effort). It was refined, luxurious, powerful and well built and had all the options that we wanted at a price that was good value for money. Plus there were three factors that really tipped the scales towards Hyundai. First, there was no, as in zero mention in the user manual that oil consumption was “normal.” That alone was worth the price of admission given our recent experiences. But the more important reason was the JD Power And Associates had Hyundai at #4 in initial quality this past June. Finally, it’s backed by a five year warranty. You don’t put a warranty of that length on the table if you don’t feel that your product is good. And JD Power thinks it’s good. So with all of that, we were willing to take the leap of faith on a Hyundai Tucson 1.6 Limited which we picked up this past Saturday. We’ve only had it for a couple of days, but we believe that we’ve made the right choice. It’s already been on a long drive to the remains of the World War II era spy school known as “Camp-X” just east of Toronto. That allowed us to become used to the vehicle and discover a few extra things about it that were not covered in the review that is currently online. Thus I’ll have an update to the review of the Tucson later this week.

At this time, my wife and I would like to thank a few people at Hyundai for making this very, very painless. First up is Greg Carrasco who I have to applaud his honesty as well as working very hard to facilitate everything and to get the best trade in value for out ailing Toyota Matrix as well as get us the best sale price for the Tucson possible. Second, Tanya Ventura gets our thanks because she made the paper work and all the setting up of the financing easy. Finally, Abdul Ghafoor gets a shout out as he worked hard to get us the vehicle we wanted and to make sure that we were ready to go this past Saturday when we went to pick it up. All of these people combined to make purchasing this vehicle easy and painless and they are examples of how car dealers should sell cars. Every other car dealer should take notes.

Now it’s time to enjoy our new vehicle and breathe a sigh a relief because our nightmare with the Toyota Matrix and the lack of will by Toyota Canada to properly address our oil consumption issues is over.

Don’t Call It A Recall: Toyota Canada

Posted in Commentary with tags on June 15, 2015 by itnerd

Frequent readers of this blog know that I’ve had issues with my 2009 Toyota Matrix. I had a weird electrical issue followed by several recalls. For details, check out my customer service nightmares page. Now, here’s the latest thing I am dealing with when it comes to this car. Oil consumption. In other words the engine consumes more oil than it should. Now all cars consume some degree or another, but I’ve never owned a car that consumes the amount of oil that I documented here:

Toyota clams that 1 litre per 1000 KM’s is “normal.” In my Matrix, I am consuming just under half that per 1000 KM’s. Anything over 1 litre per 1000 KM’s may require a very expensive engine repair that is documented in technical service bulletin T-SB-0094-11. 

If left unchecked (meaning that you check your engine oil every couple of weeks or so), you could kill your engine due to it being low on engine oil. In my case, I check it every couple of weeks and top it off almost every time I check it. I go through at least two liters of oil between oil changes. Sometimes three if I do a lot of highway driving. When I first raised the issue with my dealer four years ago, they first claimed it was “normal” and then when I called them on it, they then said that I would have to pay four digits to have it fixed.

It now turns out that it is not normal. I got a letter from Toyota Canada recently stating that there is a “Warranty Enhancement Program” related to the engine that I have. Here’s a quote from the letter that I got:

Toyota has received some reports where vehicles equipped with the 2AZ engine may exhibit excessive engine oil consumption. 

And

At this time, Toyota is currently preparing the necessary parts to implement this Warranty Enhancement Program (Ref 812), and anticipates that it will take several months to build the necessary parts. 

Finally:

  • The Primary Coverage offers warranty enhancement until August 25, 2016
  • After the Primary Coverage period ends, the Secondary Coverage is applicable for 10 years from he date of first use or 240,000 km, whichever occurs first. 

The fix that Toyota Canada is going to perform if the engine in question meets their filter is to basically rebuild the engine. Likely implementing this Technical Service Bulletin [Warning: PDF].

Now, I have a friend who has an Audi A4 which required a similar repair for a similar issue that Audi did at no charge after he threatened to sue them. He was without his car for a week and a half because they pretty much have to disassemble most of the engine to replace the pistons. But they did give him a loaner while they did it. Potentially being without my car for that long does not thrill me and I seriously doubt that Toyota is going to serve up a loaner. Though they are free to surprise me.

But the fact that Toyota calls this a “Warranty Enhancement Program” is Toyota’s way of saying to don’t call it a recall. Though I am not sure what else you could possibly call it. That may be due to a class action lawsuit that Toyota is facing in the US. I’m guessing that a lawyer told Toyota that admitting that this is a defect of some sort openly will open them up to a similar lawsuit in Canada. But I’m a computer nerd, not a lawyer. It could also be that Toyota doesn’t want to open itself up to having to repair every single engine of this type seeing that this engine was used in lots and lots of vehicles ranging from my Matrix to the RAV4, Camry, and Corolla among other models going back to 2006. That I am guessing would be very expensive. But I’m a computer nerd, not an accountant.

Now I’ve just had my oil changed and I asked for the engine consumption test to be done. Here’s what they do as part of the test:

IMG_1421 IMG_1422

As you can see, they added tamper resistant tape to the oil cap and the oil dipstick. That way you can’t top off the oil or cheat the test. I am to then drive it 2000 KM’s and come back in so that they can check the oil consumption. If it is more than 1 liter in 2000 KM’s, then I am eligible for the fix.

My thoughts? I have to admit that my faith in Toyota was questionable before this latest episode. Now this latest episode has my wife and I certain that our next car is not going to be from Toyota. Now you could argue that at least Toyota is trying to do something about it. But if you do a Google search on this issue, one thing is clear and another is subject to interpretation. The thing that is clear that this is a widespread issue that has been going on for years. The part that is subject to interpretation is that it Toyota Canada might have sat on this issue until they were forced to do something. I say that because the US had had a similar “Warranty Enhancement Program” for some time now. That doesn’t exactly inspire trust when it comes to Toyota Canada.

So, what happens if my engine fails the test? We’ll likely be trading in the vehicle for something more reliable, but after getting Toyota to fix it on their dime. I review enough cars so it gives my wife and I a good place to start looking at what we like and don’t like. Once we have a short list, we’ll see if we can get reliability data to firm up the likely suspects and take it from there.

I’ll keep you posted on my progress with this issue. This should be “interesting” and not in a good way.

Hey IT Nerd! I Want To Buy A Used Toyota Matrix. Please tell Me About Yours.

Posted in Commentary with tags on October 13, 2014 by itnerd

I got this in my inbox today:

Hello IT Nerd. I’ve read about your trials and tribulations with your Toyota Matrix. I’m thinking of buying one that was made between 2009 and 2013 for my son to go to university. Can you tell me about yours? What should I be looking for? What should I avoid? 

Thanks for the question. Other than the electrical issues that I’ve documented, I’ve had not much go wrong on it. I have over 138,000 KM’s on it and I recently had to have the oil pan resealed because it was leaking. That was almost $500. You should check the oil pan to make sure that you do or don’t need to do that. Also, make sure that the brakes have been done recently. I’ve needed the fronts done every 60,000 KM’s and the rears done once after 120,000 KM’s. It’s about $250 to get the front or rear brakes done.

Things to look for are:

  • The cloth on the seats are prone to be stained easily. Make sure that you get them cleaned and then Scotchguarded.
  • Check for oil consumption in the 2.4L engine version of the Matrix. Toyota clams that 1 litre per 1000 KM’s is “normal.” In my Matrix, I am consuming just under half that per 1000 KM’s. Anything over 1 litre per 1000 KM’s may require a very expensive engine repair that is documented in technical service bulletin T-SB-0094-11. My dealer quoted $3000 for it so this is something that you need to avoid. As an aside, this can happen to the 1.8L engine as well, but it is common in the 2.4L engines up until the 2010 model year. This also affected many other Toyota vehicles that use the 2.4L engine.
  • Check for proof that all the recalls have been done on the Matrix that you’re interested in. Here’s a list with the model years they apply to:
2012338 Toyota MATRIX 2009
2009251 Toyota MATRIX 2009-2010
2009290 Toyota MATRIX 2009-2010
2010012 Toyota MATRIX 2009-2010
2014124 Toyota MATRIX 2009-2010
2013462 Toyota MATRIX 2014

 

Of course, all the usual rules apply. Make sure to get all the service records and have it looked at by a mechanic before you put down your money.

Hope that helps!

Hey IT Nerd: What Do You Think Of Toyota’s Newest Recall Nightmare?

Posted in Commentary with tags on April 10, 2014 by itnerd

Last week I answered a question from a reader who wanted to know my thoughts on the GM recall that is ongoing. That same reader e-mailed back with another question:

Hello again IT Nerd. 

Toyota just announced a new recall that covers over six million cars. I was wondering if you had any thoughts on this seeing as you were kind enough to comment on the GM recall? Plus you’re a Toyota owner which means you have an interest in this. 

Thank you. 

Thanks for reading and thanks for the question. I see this latest Toyota recall in a couple of ways. First, in my answer to your question about GM’s recalls, I said that Toyota is going be subject to government oversight for the next three years. Thus I have a feeling that either they were trying to address anything else that could be considered a safety issue before that oversight begins, or if that oversight has begun already, it is forcing Toyota to clean house.

Second, Toyota’s brand equity that I spoke of in my previous answer about GM is going to be affected by this recall. People buy Toyota’s because of the quality factor. Now one massive recall will affect that brand equity and that perception of quality. But they can and have recovered from that. Having a second recall of a similar scale creates the possibility that they can’t recover from that in the long term. You have to think that this is scaring a lot of people at Toyota HQ right now. Why? Take yours truly for example. My Matrix is on the list of recalled cars and I will get it addressed when the notice comes. But this is the fourth recall I’ve had since buying this Matrix not to mention the electrical issue that I had that I’ve documented here. Will it affect what I purchase when the time comes to replace the Matrix? Yes. Does that mean that I will abandon Toyota. I cannot say at this point. But I will admit that my mind is open to other brands given what has gone on with Toyota over the last few years. If many other people who own Toyota products are thinking the same thing, the company has a major problem on their hands.

Toyota Canada App Allows You Explore The RAV4 In Your Hand

Posted in Commentary with tags on August 28, 2013 by itnerd

Here’s something new and different that caught my attention. Toyota Canada has released an app on Google Play as well as the App Store that allows you to test drive the new Toyota RAV4 from your phone or tablet. You can virtually take a spin in it in all sorts of road conditions as well as get a up close look at the RAV4 from inside and out. I downloaded the app onto my iPhone 5 and make sure you have a magazine handy. That’s used to calibrate the augmented reality system that the app uses to do all of this. Once you get used to it, it actually works quite well. I was able to do things like open the liftgate (which is powered in the RAV4 and you hear it open and close) as well as inspect other aspects of the vehicle from the outside. I could use the movements of my iPhone 5 to look at the inside of the RAV4 as well as do things like start the car and operate the vehicle. I couldn’t actually drive the RAV4 using my iPhone, but I could follow it’s actions.

The RAV4 Toyota’s entry in the highly competitive compact SUV market. And given how competitive that market is, this is something that likely gives them an extra means to get people into Toyota showrooms. Overall, I think it’s an interesting marketing idea, I suspect if the feedback is good, we’ll not only see more apps like these from Toyota, but we’ll see other car companies do the same thing.