If you ask me what PC laptop to buy for business, my answer is usually Lenovo. The used to be the old laptop division of IBM and they make quality stuff. But that may not matter any longer as the news is out that the governments of Australia, the US, Britain, Canada and New Zealand among others have started to ban Lenovo hardware from secure networks due to the fact that they fear that the Chinese owned company has back doors that can threaten their security. Now this isn’t new as another Chinese firm has the same issue. Huawei not only makes mobile phones, but it makes switching gear for mobile phone carriers. Thus it’s been accused of the same thing by Michael Hayden, the former head of the CIA. A claim the company denies.
So. Here’s the $64 question. Are these fears justified or is this some sort of paranoia of the Chinese. Now I don’t claim to know all the answers, but I would say two things. First, the people who are making these claims need to show proof that these companies are conduits for Chinese spying. If they can’t prove it, then they need to put their accusations in the bin and not raise them again. Second, if you put a piece of hardware on your business network, you should evaluate if it could potentially pose a threat to your company. If you think it does, keep it off your network. And I would say that this would be true if the hardware came from anyone and not just these two companies. Because anything could be a threat. It doesn’t have to come from a specific place.
What do you think? Are people over-reacting or is there a legitimate concern here? Post a comment and share your thoughts.
Hey IT Nerd! Do US Charges Against Chinese Hackers Mean Anything?
Posted in Commentary with tags China, Security, US on May 20, 2014 by itnerdAnother question from a reader popped into my inbox today:
Good afternoon. Yesterday, the US Government laid charges against a number of Chinese officials for cybercrimes against six US companies. My question is, does that really matter as I don’t see China handing these people over to stand trial?
Thanks for the question. Before I answer your question, let me do a quick recap. Yesterday the US Department of Justice laid charges against five people who they accused of hacking six US companies and then turning over whatever they electronically stole to Chinese based companies. In effect, these five people are accused of cyber espionage for commercial gain. Now, I’m all for going after those who hack other people or companies and I am all for them being punished to the fullest extent of the law. However, that’s likely not going to happen in this case. There’s zero chance that China will hand over these people. Which means they will never face justice. Plus this is likely to increase tensions between the US and China. Thus other than give the appearance that the US is going after cybercrime, I fail to see the point of this exercise. Perhaps there’s something going on behind the scenes that is connected to this that will clarify things, assuming we find out about it. But as it stands now, the logic of laying these charges escapes me.
Perhaps some of the readers of this blog has some further insight on this? If so, please leave a comment and share your wisdom.
Leave a comment »