SAP SE has announced the results of a new SAP® Concur® survey revealing that more than 4 in 5 Canadian female business travelers have faced harassment while travelling. SAP Concur, the world’s leading brand for expense, travel, and invoice management solutions, identified concerns of personal safety while on the road and frustration around ineffective booking and reimbursement experiences.
The survey of 7,850 business travelers in 19 global markets included 500 within Canada. Notable highlights are:
- Globally, LGBTQ+ travelers are hiding aspects of their identity when travelling for work:
- The vast majority (95%) of LGBTQ+ travellers have hidden their sexual orientation while on a business trip, with the most common reasons being to protect their safety (57%).
- Further, 85 per cent have changed their travel arrangements out of concern for their safety, compared to just 53 per cent of their non-LGBTQ+ colleagues.
- Among Canadians, female travelers face striking levels of harassment and sexism on the road:
- More than 4 in 5 Canadian female business travellers (81%) have experienced some sort of harassment or mistreatment while travelling, and nearly half (46%) have been asked if they were travelling with their husband.
- Canadians are stressed when planning for a business trip, but expense reimbursement is the real pain point:
- A lack of clear-cut policy is impacting employees who are feeling more stressed at the office than on the road. To Canadian business travellers, before the trip (47%)—when they have to plan, book and organize—is the most stressful stage.
- Though Canadian business travelers dread planning their trip the most, the processes after the trip are still a notable pain point. In fact, over 1 in 4 Canadian business travelers (26%) would rather have a cavity filled at the dentist than fill out an expense report after a business trip.
- The primary reason for loathing expense reports is the delay in reimbursement. Canadian business travelers report that employers have taken, on average, up to 11 days to reimburse them for a business trip expense.
- These delays in reimbursement for expenses are affecting Canadian business travelers’ trust in their companies: Over half (54%) of Canadian business travellers report they forfeited expenses in 2018, either because they did not think the expense was worth filing or—more troublingly—because their employer simply never paid them the money they’re owed. They have forfeited an average of $1,421 CAD from expenses that weren’t reimbursed by their employers.
- Canadian business travelers turning to technology to improve employee experience:
- Canadian business travelers have become accustomed to using apps and smart devices to enhance their daily lives, but they don’t believe their companies have kept up with the times.
- Canadians surveyed have the third-highest rate of agreement that their company is behind in adopting the latest technologies to manage travel (73%), compared to the global sentiment (67%).
- Canadians who say their company is lagging note booking and expense reporting tools (61%) and travel safety tools (57%) as the technologies that need the most attention.
- Even those whose companies are taking advantage of technology see room for improvement. More than 3 in 5 business travellers who use an online booking tool (62%) report their companies are behind in adopting booking and expense reporting tools, compared to the 53 per cent of those who do not use an online booking tool.
More results of the Global Business Traveler Survey can be found at https://www.concur.com/en-us/resource-center/whitepapers/business-traveler-report-2019
The survey was conducted by Wakefield Research (www.wakefieldresearch.com), a leading independent provider of quantitative, qualitative and hybrid market research, among 7,850 business travelers, defined as those who travel for business three or more times annually from the following markets: Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, India, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Malaysia, Sweden, United Kingdom and the United States. The survey took place July–August 2019.
Concur Travel becomes the first booking tool to offer ISO 14083-assured emissions data
Posted in Commentary with tags Concur on January 22, 2025 by itnerdThe new Concur Travel has achieved a significant milestone by becoming the first online booking tool to integrate emissions calculations assured to the new ISO 14083 standard. This development, made possible through our partnership with Thrust Carbon, marks a big step forward in providing accurate and consistent emissions data for customers at the point of booking.
Why ISO matters
The ISO 14083 standard was created to address the confusion and inconsistency caused by the multitude of emissions calculation methods currently in use. ISO 14083 offers a single, globally recognised framework for calculating greenhouse gas emissions across all transportation modes, including air, rail, car and freight. By harmonizing methodologies, ISO 14083 provides organisations with consistent, credible data to guide their regulatory efforts.
This standard also aligns with climate initiatives like the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) which mandates emissions reporting for over 50,000 companies globally, starting in 2025. Additionally, the proposed Count Emissions EU initiative will require transportation providers to display emissions data at the point of sale. The EU’s endorsement of ISO 14083 as a trusted methodology underscores the importance of adopting this standard.
Leading the way with Thrust Carbon!
The new Concur Travel, in partnership with Thrust Carbon, now delivers ISO 14083-assured emissions data at the point of booking. This integration provides customers with reliable and globally recognised sustainability metrics, enabling organisations to align with incoming international standards.
Thrust Carbon adopts a “multi-methodology” approach to emissions calculations. While their current enhanced ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organisation) approach accounts for real-world factors such as airspace closures, they’ve also introduced a dedicated ISO-compliant formula. This ensures adherence to the standardised requirements of ISO 14083, including the use of consistent flight calculations.
Live now, new Concur Travel customers have access to ISO-assured emissions data, enabling standardised and informed sustainability decisions.
Simplifying emissions reporting
The transition to ISO 14083 standards isn’t just about accuracy, it’s about consistency. For organisations navigating the complexities of CSRD compliance, Thrust Carbon’s robust reporting capabilities ensure that emissions data viewed at the time of booking matches data used within official reports. This alignment simplifies the reporting process and helps businesses make informed decisions about their sustainability strategies.
Creating a sustainable future
In their 2024 Sustainability Benchmark, the Global Business Travel Association (GBTA) assessed the emissions reduction efforts in corporate travel across all industry sectors. On a scale from 0 (no action) to 5 (leading practice), the average sustainability maturity score for the 241 organizations assessed was 1.3. This reveals the severe need for corporate climate action, and that clear, enforceable standards such as ISO 14083 would be instrumental in guiding the collective effort.
By integrating ISO-assured emissions data into new Concur Travel, our customers can confidently navigate a complex future of regulations and advancements knowing that their data is up to the highest standard — equipped with the tools they need to meet their sustainability goals.
What’s next?
The new ISO 14083-assured data is now live in new Concur Travel and is a critical milestone in the mission to provide transparent, reliable and actionable emissions data for customers.
With new Concur Travel and Thrust Carbon’s partnership, businesses can now approach sustainability goals with confidence in the integrity of their emissions reporting.
Leave a comment »