Archive for verizon

Hey IT Nerd: Why Is Verizon’s Decision To Enter The Canadian Cell Phone Market That Big Of A Deal?

Posted in Commentary with tags , on June 28, 2013 by itnerd

I’ve received several e-mails asking the above question. It’s a big deal for a number of reasons:

  • First, Verizon is a cell phone company that is much bigger then Bell, Telus, and Rogers combined. That gives them a lot of power to walk in and set up shop in quick order.  As in set up their own infrastructure to allow them to have nationwide coverage equal to or better than the big three. It also gives Verizon the power to fight anything the big three can throw at it.
  • Next, Verizon can do something that Bell, Telus, and Rogers cannot do. That is if they were to set up shop here, they could have North American roaming at a price point where the big three Canadian carriers could not compete at. Perhaps even at no extra charge. That would be a game changer.
  • Verizon is currently 45% owned by Vodafone who is a British multinational telco. Though that could change. In any case, Verizon likely would not be afraid to use that influence if it had to. Such as having international roaming rates that the big three could not compete with.
  • Verizon’s mere existence in this market would give customers who are fed up with the big three Canadian carriers the reason they need defect from them in droves. This would force the big three to lower prices and improve customer service to retain customers. A side effect of this is that it would make retaining customers expensive for the big three. That has a direct effect on their average annual revenue per user which affects their profits. That explains why Rogers, Bell, and Telus stock nosedived when this news hit the wires the other day. Investors clearly see the writing on the wall.
  • Verizon previously owned 20% of Telus. So while they were last in the Canadian marketplace in 2004, they aren’t exactly new to the challenges that this market may have.
  • If Verizon shows up in Canada, expect other international wireless providers to follow suit. That will put additional pressure on the big three.

Now keep in mind that it is still early days and this this deal may not happen. But you have to believe that with both Wind and Mobilicity looking for buyers and a Canadian government who is all for increased competition in the wireless space, the odds of this deal happening have to be good. Thus this is a very big deal for Canadian cell phone customers who want an viable alternative in the marketplace that provides affordable prices and great customer service.

Verizon Goes After Wind Mobile And Maybe Mobilicity….. Yahoo!

Posted in Commentary with tags , on June 26, 2013 by itnerd

It’s official, Verizon wants into Canada and they’re using the logic of go big or go home. According to The Globe And Mail, they’ve made a $700 offer for Wind Mobile. Plus they’re holding talks with Mobilicity and they’re considering taking part in the next round of wireless spectrum auction:

Verizon, long barred from full ownership of a Canadian telecom company by foreign investment rules, now has an opening. Ottawa last year relaxed those restrictions on small telecom companies with market share of 10 per cent or less, with an eye to increasing competition for the big three phone companies, Telus Corp., Rogers Communications Inc. and BCE Inc.

You can bet that execs at Rogers, Bell, and Telus are freaking out right now. If this does go through, today will be the date that you will want to mark on the calendar as the day that things changed for the better for consumers who have cellular service in Canada.

Verizon May Be Coming To Canada…. Bell, Telus, Rogers Freak

Posted in Commentary with tags , on June 20, 2013 by itnerd

I’ve been saying for years that the only way that the absolutely obscene prices that Canadians pay for wireless service will change is by foreign carriers to come in and force the incumbent carriers (being Rogers, Bell and Telus) to lower their prices. Well, that day might be at hand. The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Verizon might be looking to enter the Canadian market by buying Wind Mobile:

Verizon, which is based in New York, has considering entering Canada’s wireless business as that country’s government seeks to jump start competition in the country. The Globe and Mail newspaper reported this week that Verizon has held exploratory talks with Wind Mobile in recent weeks, but said the discussions are at an early stage.

If this actually pans out, you have to believe that Bell, Rogers, and Telus will do everything possible to try and block it. But seeing as the current government is all for lowering prices of wireless services in Canada, I’m thinking that the Canadian Government will likely green light this. Then the real game begins. Verizon has deep pockets so their network will likely expand quickly and their pricing structure will likely follow. That’s bad news for the big three. But great news for consumers. What’s even better is that if Verizon comes, others will likely follow. That will be better news for consumers. 

You have to believe that execs at the big three are freaking out big time as you read this. It’s about time that they had a reason to worry. 

Verizon Decides That Hurricane Victims Don’t Deserve Landlines Or DSL

Posted in Commentary with tags on March 23, 2013 by itnerd

From the “it’s all about the profits” file comes this story. According to Stop The Cap, those who were hit by Hurricane Sandy last October who live or do business on the Fire Island are not going to get wireline – as in plain old telephone service or DSL service back. Residents of Fire Island thus are being forced to go wireless or have nothing:

Fire Island’s landline network has been barely functional since Hurricane Sandy struck last October. Verizon has yet to make significant repairs, leading to ongoing complaints from residents who live on the island year-round. Verizon’s wish to eventually abandon its wired network facilities entirely has created concern among island officials and public safety agencies, noting the summer population on the island swells well into the thousands.

Verizon’s plan may leave businesses unable to process credit card transactions and prevent residents from getting back DSL broadband service they lost during the storm, much less get it in the future. For some, it represents turning the clock back to the days before Internet access.

Lovely. But as one would expect, Verizon is defending this move:

Verizon told local officials that Cherry Grove and points east still have undamaged fiber optic and copper lines that should be able to work as usual this summer and will be left in place for now. On the west end of the island  from Kismet to Sailor’s Haven, the damage was more significant and Verizon has announced its intention to abandon wired service.

Although west end customers will be scheduled for Voice Link installations starting in April, those on the east side should not get too comfortable with their wired service because Verizon has announced it will not upgrade or make future significant repairs to its wired infrastructure going forward. When the remaining landline facilities eventually fail, affected customers will also be moved to Voice Link.

Their alternative? Here’s what Verizon will do for you:

Starting April 1st, customers calling with service problems on Fire Island will be redirected to special operators trained to pitch customers the Voice Link service as a replacement. These agents will also handle billing adjustments and drop phone package features Voice Link does not support. If the customer only wants phone service, Verizon will schedule an installation date for Voice Link. A technician will arrive with a wall-mounted box about 8″ high that will be installed in the room that provides the best reception from a nearby Verizon Wireless tower. The box will then be connected to your home telephone wiring and a nearby power outlet so existing telephones will work once again. The box has battery backup powered by customer-installed and maintained AA batteries.

If a customer also had broadband service with Verizon, they will not be getting it back. Instead, an agent will attempt to sell the customer a Verizon Wireless mobile broadband package at a significantly higher cost. For example, a 10GB monthly usage plan added to an existing Verizon Wireless account will cost an extra $20 a month for the “Mi-Fi” mobile hotspot device fee and $100 a month for the data package. Verizon DSL in comparison offered unlimited access for $30-50 a month, depending on the plan selected and any promotional discounts.

It sounds good except for this:

Voice Link is a voice-only product. It does not support broadband, telephone modem connections, faxing, alarm monitoring, home medical monitoring, certain communications equipment for the impaired, or other data services including credit card processing. It does support E911, which gives detailed address information to a 911 operator.

Verizon’s Voice Link also creates a problem for some satellite dish customers. Some satellite companies need a landline connection for handling pay-per-view orders. That data connection does not work with Voice Link either.

Thus, Verizon basically gives those consumers less and charges them more and their profits increase. Plus since they’re the only game in town in this area, consumers have no choice.

Clearly Verizon isn’t interested in doing the right thing. Clearly profits come before people. Clearly there needs to be some sort of government intervention to stop this  from happening. Period.

Verizon Gets The iPhone…. Freedom From AT&T Makes Fanbois Happy

Posted in Commentary with tags , , on January 11, 2011 by itnerd

The day that iPhone fanbois have been waiting for has finally arrived. You can now get an iPhone on the Verizon network starting on 2-10-11. If you’re willing to become tied to Verizon for 2 years, you’ll pay $199.99 for the 16GB model, and $299.99 for the 32GB model. No word on data plans as that’s “coming soon.”

While I’m sure that the fanbois are rejoicing happy as this is news that they’ve waited years for, there is one hitch. This is a CDMA only phone. So don’t expect to travel with it. It would have been nice if they came up with a dual CDMA/GSM phone just like the Blackberry Tour. But at least the fanbois have freedom from AT&T’s network.

AT&T Drops “There’s A Map For That” Lawsuit…. Perhaps The Best Decision They’ve Made

Posted in Commentary with tags , , on December 2, 2009 by itnerd

AT&T has decided to drop their rather ill advised lawsuit against Verizon over their ads that parody the “There’s an app for that” theme. Some other lawsuits between the two have also been dropped. Now one has to wonder what made them do this? Could it be that AT&T decided not to go back to court after failing to get the ads pulled? Could it be that the Luke Wilson ads didn’t resonate with consumers? Or could it be that a recent Consumers Reports survey put Verizon on top and AT&T dead last? Seeing as one of the lawsuits that was dropped had something to do with claims of 3G reliability, that is a distinct possibility.

Who knows the true reasons behind this are. But maybe now AT&T can focus on improving their network that has many iPhone users irate instead of suing their competition.

AT&T Brings Luke Wilson Back For Another Crappy Ad

Posted in Commentary with tags , on November 26, 2009 by itnerd

Another day, another really bad ad from AT&T starring Luke Wilson. Here it is:

Ignoring the fact that iPhone users who have 3G capable phones are often stuck on EDGE which doesn’t support this feature as has been discussed here previously, this ad does nothing to counter what Verizon has said. That is, AT&T’s 3G coverage sucks. Until they address that, these ads will continue to be useless in terms of helping AT&T’s image.

Sprint Gets Hit By Verizon Over “Most Dependable” Claim

Posted in Commentary with tags , on November 24, 2009 by itnerd

I guess that after kicking AT&T all over the Map with their ads and in court (thus far), Verizon is getting bold. Now they’ve gone to the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus to get Sprint to drop their “Most Dependable” claim about their network. What do they have as proof? They have a study performed by Nielsen Co. that says that less calls are dropped on Verizon vs. Sprint. The funny thing is that the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus agreed with Verizon [Warining: PDF]. So now they’re 2 for 2. Sprint is going to appeal this decision, so expect a round two, or more.

So Verizon, you’ve targeted AT&T and Sprint. Who’s next for you?

AT&T Launches New Ads To Fight Verizon…. Epic Fail

Posted in Commentary with tags , on November 23, 2009 by itnerd

The good news: AT&T hasn’t launched a new lawsuit against Verizon.

The bad news: AT&T have a bunch of new ads that have hit the airwaves. The first two center around the iPhone and the iPhone’s ability to do things like check e-mail and use apps while you’re on a call:

Okay. I guess that might be cool, but they don’t really answer the core argument from the Verizon ads. From where I sit, if Verizon comes out and says “your network coverage sucks!” and the best AT&T can come up with is “Yeah, well your phones can’t go online to do stuff while you’re using the phone to make calls on your network” then it’s clear that Verizon has hit the mark with their ads and AT&T is in no position to fight back directly against Verizon’s arguments.

Oh, Luke Wilson is back with a couple of new AT&T ads as well:

Great. AT&T can reach 300 million Americans which is according to them 97% of the population. But is that with 3G coverage which is the whole point of the Verizon ads? I think not. But why let little details like that get in the way of trying to bash their competition?

The bottom line is that these ads from AT&T are craptastic. No shock there considering that AT&T makes no attempt to answer Verizon’s claims. I really thought that AT&T was wasting their money suing Verizon. Now I think they’re also wasting their money with uber lame ads like these. Perhaps AT&T should just wave the white flag and just give their customers better 3G coverage in as many places as possible. Oh while they’re at it, they should make iPhone users happy by not having service that’s so crappy it has become notorious for dropping calls like Luke Wilson drops postcards.

Face it AT&T, Verizon has beaten you. Deal with it and fix your network.

Judge Tells AT&T That Verizon Can Keep Running Those Ads…. And AT&T Comes Out With An Ad Of Their Own

Posted in Commentary with tags , on November 19, 2009 by itnerd

AT&T and Verizon met in court yesterday over that lawsuit that AT&T filed because they are a bit ticked at Verizon’s “There’s a map for that” ad campaign. The issue at hand was that AT&T wanted those ads yanked off the air immediately.

That didn’t happen.

However the judge did set a date of December 16th for AT&T to try again. In the meantime, AT&T has now decided that a new ad starring Luke Wilson will solve their problems.

Oh for those who don’t know who Luke Wilson is, you might remember him from such movies as “Legally Blonde,” “Old School” and “Jackass Number Two.”

Yeah, I’m not impressed either.

In any case, it’s clear that they threw this together quickly and didn’t put a lot of time into it. Which means that the message is lost to the viewer because there’s nothing to engage the viewer. Meanwhile the Verizon ads deliver their point that AT&T’s 3G coverage sucks with the precision of a cruise missile because of the fact that their ads are designed from the ground up to engage the viewer. That’s what you get when you spend something more than 60 seconds to come up with an ad campaign.

My advice to AT&T? Give up now and spend the money that they’re tossing at the lawyers towards fixing their network so that it has better 3G coverage. Besides, by the time they’re back in court the damage from the Verizon ads will be done and AT&T will look like fools for fighting this.