If problems with their graphic chipsets followed by lawsuits from ticked off users isn’t enough to cause Nvidia pain, this will. Their own insurance company is now suing them. Why? Here’s a few reasons from National Union (Nvidia’s insurance company):
“Concurrently with, or prior to, placing National Union on notice of the chip claims, Nvidia has engaged in settlement negotiations with the chip claimants and, on information and belief, has agreed to settlements and/or the material terms of settlements with respect to some or all of the chip claims,” the filing says.
But, complains NUFI: “Nvidia has not permitted National Union to participate in Nvidia’s negotiations of the chip claims or the determination of any settlement or agreements.”
NUFI alleges that Nvidia won’t tell it about the chip claims, and instead has “flooded National Union with technical data” and provided it with details about the GPUs themselves.
It continues that Nvidia has “cloaked its refusals to provide information under the guise of preserving commercial relationships with the chip claimants.” But NUFI says it wants objective, material and non-proprietary information – for example the records of the repairs made.
That translates to something along the lines of this: Nvidia been covering up essential information that NUFI is entitled to receive as Nvidia’s insurer by refusing to disclose even the most basic facts about the company’s GPU chip failures. But it gets better (or worse depending on if you’re Nvidia or not):
“The chip claims arise out of allegedly defectively designed Nvidia chips G86, G86A2, G84, C51, G72, G72M, G73, G72A3, MCP67 and NV42.”
If that’s true, then Nvidia is truly screwed, because that’s a much larger list of potentially defective hardware than Nvidia led people to believe. Some of the chipsets on that list are desktop chipsets. I should point out that this was raised as a possibility some time ago. But now that there’s more then just rumor, I can just see the lawyers prepping the class action lawsuits to serve up to Nvidia.
Oh, what does their insurance company want out of all of this? Simple:
So National Union doesn’t want to pay up. It wants the court to declare it has no duty to indemnify Nvidia because Nvidia has breached the terms of the agreement.
That means that if they win, their insurance company doesn’t have to pay a dime. I suspect that it would like cripple or kill Nvidia too. I guess that Nvidia should have taken my advice from this posting:
Nvidia has to step up to the table regardless of whether this is fact or not and clear this up once and for all. Users of their chipsets have the right to know if the Nvidia chipset they have in their computer is faulty or not. If they are, users of their products have the right to a speedy replacement with a part that works. If Nvidia doesn’t do that and these chips are faulty, then they deserve to be run out of business.
Looks like Nvidia’s days are numbered. It sucks to be them.
Has Nvidia Been Punted From Dell? [UPDATED]
Posted in Commentary with tags Dell, NVIDIA on May 26, 2009 by itnerdThe Inquirer is reporting that Dell has kicked Nvidia to the curb because of their ongoing nightmare with their graphics processor chipsets:
This is nothing less than a sea change at Dell. Nvidia has basically been shown the door by Dell in a most unceremonious fashion. Nvidia either decided to stop buying market share, or Dell just got fed up with it, but don’t preclude both.
From reading the article, it appears that The Inquirer bases this on the fact that with the exception of a few XPS models, desktops are no longer coming with Nvidia hardware. They also cite that laptops are not far behind. Of course there are no sources to back this info up. But they did break the story on Nvidia’s problems and have been right about all the details to this point. So this report should be taken as plausible until there is definitive proof either way. And if this is true, then the downfall of Nvidia has begun.
Not that I’m suprised given the way they’ve handled this circus.
UPDATE: For some bizarre reason, I quoted The Register as the source of this story. It should be the Inquirer. Thanks to the “AngryTechnician” for pointing that out.
1 Comment »