A detailed in a report published by Pradeo, analysts discovered two file management apps on the Google Play Store to be spyware, secretly sending the user data of 1.5 million Android users to servers in China.
Seemingly harmless Spyware apps, File Recovery and Data Recovery (1 million plus installs) and File Manager (500k plus installs), are developed by the same malicious group and assure users that no data is collected, automatically launch when the device reboots, and hides their icons on home screens.
Pradeo’s analytics engine has found stolen data to include contact lists, media files, real-time location, mobile country code, network provider details, SIM provider network code, operating system version, device brand, and model. Each app performs more than a hundred transmissions and then transmits the data to multiple servers in China which are deemed malicious.
Ted Miracco, CEO, Approov Mobile Security had this to say:
“The security issues related to this story are deeply concerning, albeit not surprising. The most fundamental problem is the false sense of security that consumers and businesses have related to app stores like Google Play (and Apple’s Appstore) in terms of actually protecting devices and individuals from these malicious apps.
“Both Apple and Google are actively promoting their security efforts at developer conferences, achieving record profits and sales while many of the apps available have huge discrepancies between their stated privacy policies and the actual information and data collected. These include both legitimate mainstream apps, that bend the rules without apparent consequences, and malicious apps that engage in deceptive behavior, claiming not to collect data while secretly doing so.
“App marketplaces must prioritize the implementation of more robust security measures to detect and prevent the infiltration of malicious apps that compromise user data. It is also important for users to remain vigilant in protecting their devices and for businesses to be extremely wary of deceptive and modified apps that can compromise their data and their employers’ data.
“The fact that the data is being sent to malicious servers in China compounds the gravity of the threat while making it extremely difficult for consumers and businesses to mitigate the repercussions and long term damage that might occur from the stolen data. It also highlights the complex global nature of cyber threats and the importance of international collaboration in addressing such issues.
“Cooperation between security experts, app stores, and law enforcement agencies is vital to combatting these malicious activities and safeguarding user data, yet it is a monumental task that may take decades to be resolved, due to the complexity and competing global agendas.”
This illustrates why you shouldn’t just install anything on your Android or iPhone. Because you simply don’t know what the apps do and where your data is going.
Hirudo Android RAT kills, replaces & runs banking apps
Posted in Commentary with tags Android on October 15, 2026 by itnerdThreatFabric has disclosed a new Android banking RAT called Hirudo that can replace legitimate banking apps with modified copies designed to manipulate their own security checks, including app-signing validation, Accessibility detection and Play Integrity responses.
Rather than simply stealing credentials or displaying overlays, Hirudo can make a compromised banking app appear trustworthy to itself and to controls that rely on signals generated on the device.
In response, mobile app security expert Ted Miracco, CEO of Approov, offers comments:
“Hirudo doesn’t break the bank’s defenses. The trojan deletes the genuine app, installs a copy signed with a public test key, and loads a hooking engine inside that app’s process. From then on that app asks Android who signed it and hears the right answer. It asks which accessibility services are running and hears none. Its Play Integrity request is routed through the attacker’s server and comes back clean.
“The conclusion is uncomfortable but simple: an app running on a phone you don’t control cannot be a witness in its own defense. Integrity signals have to be produced and judged somewhere the attacker can’t reach, tied to the session and to the specific payment, with revocation actually checked. ThreatFabric found the operators using a leaked keybox holding certificates Google had already revoked. A bank checking server-side would have caught that. A bank trusting the verdict on the handset could not.
“The uncomfortable part for the industry is that this engine isn’t bank-specific. It’s a reusable tool pointed at eight Indonesian apps today, with target lists in the code already naming five other countries.”
This is not a good development as I expect this to be repurposed to fit any use case. Which is bad for all of us.
Leave a comment »